COST CONSIDERATIONS. This agreement does not authorize financial expenditures by the COG on behalf of FEMA. The FEMA IPAWS Program is responsible for the costs associated with developing, operating and maintaining the availability of the IPAWS-OPEN system. The COG is responsible for all costs related to providing their users with access to IPAWS- OPEN via the public Internet. These costs may include hardware, software, monthly Internet charges, completion of security awareness training and other related jurisdictional costs.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. Both parties agree to be responsible for their own systems and costs of the interconnecting mechanism and/or media. No financial commitments to reimburse the other party shall be made without the written concurrence of both parties. Modifications to either system that are necessary to support the interconnection are the responsibility of the respective system/network owners’ organization. This ISA neither authorizes, requires, nor precludes any transfer of funds without the agreement of both parties.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Public Representative comments. As
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Postal Service presents a financial analysis showing that Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 5 results in cost savings while ensuring that the contract covers its attributable costs, does not result in subsidization of competitive products by market dominant products, and increases contribution from competitive products.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. 1. The plan developed pursuant to Section D.5 shall address at a minimum the following criteria:
a. The estimated Capital Costs and O&M Costs and cost basis of any proposed facilities (whether new or modified at Blue Plains or at any other facilities or sites) shall be consistent with the MJUFs and cost allocations, as defined in Section 5;
b. The proposed allocation of Capital Costs and O&M Costs;
c. The anticipated schedule for when funds to support these actions are likely to be needed.
2. The rental or sale of Allocated Flow Capacity shall be at the discretion of the Party which is providing the Allocated Flow Capacity for rent or sale.
3. The Parties to the rental or sale transaction shall mutually agree on the cost basis for the rental or sale of Allocated Flow Capacity.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. Any references to the performances of System Providers may not account for transaction costs, such as broker fees or other fees related to the Client's Autotrading Account under this Agreement.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Commission reviews competitive product prices to ensure that each product covers its attributable costs, does not cause market dominant products to subsidize competitive products, and contributes to the Postal Service’s institutional costs. 39 U.S.C. § 3633(a); 39 C.F.R. §§ 3015.5 and 3015.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. Provide annual fee for services identified in the Scope of Work for each year of the contract term (5 fiscal years – July to June). July 2020 – June 2021 (Annual Fee) $59,000 July 2021 – June 2022 (Annual Fee) $60,000 July 2022 – June 2023 (Annual Fee) $61,000 July 2023 – June 2024 (Annual Fee) $62,000 July 2024 – June 2025 (Annual Fee) $63,000 Actuarial Analysis $7,500 - $15,000 Conduct TPA Audit $10,000 - $15,000 D. Conformance to RFP Xxxx Companies offers Mobile Benefits Solutions to provide your employees with 24/7 access to employee benefit information from any mobile device. The app is designed to help employees easily use and better understand their benefits, saving both the member and company valuable time and money. XXXX COMPANIES OF ARIZONA | 0000 X XXXXXXXXX XX | Suite 129 | Phoenix | AZ | 85018 City of ABC 2019-2020 Plan Year - Renewal Projection Dashboard EE EE+SP EE+CH Fam EE EE+SP EE+CH Fam 1 The City of ABC Medical Plan Projection is increasing by 6.8% CIGNA OAP February 1, 2019 4 Prior Year Renewal Info > Prior year renewal increase was 8.2%.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The stakeholders who have the most interest for BannaTree are the factory and the AD. Farmers will benefit the least from all the stakeholders. However they will still have an incentive to use the application if the AD makes it mandatory as a con- ditional statement for contract farmers. Therefore, the consideration is that Banna- Tree will receive funding from the government. Additionally, the factory could xxxxx- cial the other part of BannaTree. However, this can also be seen as a future scenario. Another scenario for the future could be that the government retreats and that the factory will takeover the entire financial part for BannaTree as the factory can use the BannaTree information service to improve their business. Thus, multiple scenarios can be made up for the cost considerations of the BannaTree service. In section 9, ’Deployment and Sustainability Plan’, the scenarios for the sustainability plans for BannaTree are further elaborated.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Lebanon Police Department and the Lebanon School District shall equally share expenses that are not grant related for the SRO salary, and necessary training requirements. The Lebanon Police Department will pay any expenses that are strictly police related, and in turn, the Lebanon School District will pay any expenses that are strictly school related.
