Common use of Criteria for Promotion of Instructor Employees Clause in Contracts

Criteria for Promotion of Instructor Employees. (a) Consideration for promotion from Instructor I to Instructor II shall be automatic in the employee's third year of service. (b) Consideration for promotion from Instructor II to Instructor III shall be automatic in the employee's fourth year in the Instructor II rank. (c) Outside of this schedule for automatic consideration, an Instructor employee will only be considered for promotion if he/she so requests in writing to the chairperson (or equivalent) of his/her department by October 30 of the year in which he/she wishes to be considered. (d) For promotion to Instructor II, teaching effectiveness at the norm defined in Article 12.2(f) shall be sufficient unless there is evidence of seriously deficient performance in other assigned areas of responsibility. Where there is such evidence, teaching effectiveness which is well above the norm shall compensate. (e) For promotion to Instructor III, normally teaching effectiveness, level of professional development, and conscientiousness in the performance of assigned non-teaching duties shall all be at or above the norm defined in Article 12.2(f). However, teaching effectiveness which is well above the norm may compensate for achievement somewhat below the norm in the other two (2) areas.

Criteria for Promotion of Instructor Employees. (a) Consideration for promotion from Instructor I to Instructor II shall be automatic in the employee's third year of service. (b) Consideration for promotion from Instructor II to Instructor III shall be automatic in the employee's fourth year in the Instructor II rank. (c) Outside of this schedule for automatic consideration, an Instructor employee will only be considered for promotion if he/she so requests in writing to the chairperson (or equivalent) of his/her department by October 30 of the year in which he/she wishes to be considered. (d) Years of service at Carleton University in full-time academic employment, or in employment which would have made an Instructor employee holding a preliminary appointment in 1976-77 eligible for membership in the bargaining unit (had it existed) shall be counted as full years of service for determining eligibility for promotion. (e) For promotion to Instructor II, teaching effectiveness at the norm defined in Article 12.2(f) shall be sufficient unless there is evidence of seriously deficient performance in other assigned areas of responsibility. Where there is such evidence, teaching effectiveness which is well above the norm shall compensate. (ef) For promotion to Instructor III, normally teaching effectiveness, level of professional development, and conscientiousness in the performance of assigned non-teaching duties shall all be at or above the norm defined in Article 12.2(f). However, teaching effectiveness which is well above the norm may compensate for achievement somewhat below the norm in the other two (2) areas.