Daiichi Sankyo Patents Sample Clauses

Daiichi Sankyo Patents. Using counsel of its choice, AnHeart shall be responsible, at its sole expense, for preparing, filing, prosecuting, and maintaining the Daiichi Sankyo Patents that Cover the Licensed Compounds and/or Product(s), including preparing and filing requests for patent term extensions, supplemental protection certificates, pediatric exclusivity, or similar protections that extend the term of such Daiichi Sankyo Patents. AnHeart shall also be solely responsible for defending the Daiichi Sankyo Patents from any challenges to their validity or enforceability, including responding to patent office communications or office actions, oppositions, reissue or reexamination proceedings, or interferences, brought by any Third Party, whether before a patent authority or judicial body. Daiichi Sankyo shall, upon request, provide reasonable support to AnHeart in (i) preparing, filing, prosecuting, and maintaining the Daiichi Sankyo Patents and (ii) defending the Daiichi Sankyo Patents from any challenges to their validity or enforceability, including, but not limited to, providing and signing documents, or making experts available for testimony as necessary for AnHeart to fulfill its obligations under this Section 6.2.1. AnHeart will reimburse Daiichi Sankyo for reasonable 20181207 – AnHeart-DS Exclusive License out-of-pocket expenses, in accordance with AnHeart’s expense reimbursement policies, and will pay Daiichi Sankyo a rate of [**Redacted**] per day for the time expended by Daiichi Sankyo personnel for travel requested by AnHeart. If AnHeart 20181207 – AnHeart-DS Exclusive License decides that it will no longer prosecute or maintain a Daiichi Sankyo Patent, it will give Daiichi Sankyo reasonable notice of its decision, which will include sufficient time prior to the expiration or termination of all relevant deadlines for taking necessary actions to preserve the rights in such Daiichi Sankyo Patent, and will allow Daiichi Sankyo to assume control over and continue prosecuting and maintaining such Daiichi Sankyo Patent. If Daiichi Sankyo continues to prosecute and/or maintain a Daiichi Sankyo Patent after AnHeart returns responsibility to Daiichi Sankyo, such Daiichi Sankyo Patent shall [**Redacted**].
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Daiichi Sankyo Patents. US or JP Apply. No. Date of filing US or JP Patent No Date of patent Date of expiration 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 8 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 10 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The above list references certain Patents in the United States. Other relevant patents and patent applications (and patents issuing therefrom) throughout the world are included as Daiichi Sankyo Patents under the Agreement, but for the convenience of the Parties, are not specifically itemized above.
Daiichi Sankyo Patents. USP and its corresponding patents and patent applications* Country Appln. No. Date of filing Patent No. Date of patent Date of expiration (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) *The above list references certain Patents in (*). Appendix 2. INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Tesetaxel (DJ-927) CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Tesetaxel (DJ-927) Overview: The Product is being transferred to Genta on Clinical Hold in the Territory (*).
Daiichi Sankyo Patents 

Related to Daiichi Sankyo Patents

  • Patent Rights The State and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract.

  • Licensed Patents Licensee shall be responsible for all further patent prosecution with respect to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technologies set out in Exhibit “A”. Licensee may select the patent agent for the prosecution of the Licensed Patents, subject to the approval of Licensor as the patent owner, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall provide Licensor with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Licensed Patents so that Licensor may be informed and apprised of and meaningfully consulted as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall keep all such documentation confidential. In the event the Licensee does not agree that any given patent application or patent should be filed, prosecuted or maintained (hereinafter referred to as a “Refused Licensed Patent”) in a particular jurisdiction(s) Licensee shall indicate such disagreement in writing (hereinafter “Refusal Notice”) and upon Licensor’s receipt of such Refusal Notice Licensor shall have the right unilaterally to make, prosecute and maintain such Refused Licensed * Confidential Information, indicated by [***], has been omitted from this filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission Patent in such jurisdiction(s) in the name of its owners, at Licensor’s expense, and Licensee shall not have any rights or obligations to such Refused Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction(s); provided, however, that Licensee shall retain all of its ownership rights in any Refused Licensed Patent that is a Co-Owned Technology. In such case Licensor shall provide Licensee with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Refused Licensed Patents so that Licensee may be informed and apprised of and be meaningfully consulted with as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall have no obligation to continue prosecution or maintenance of any Refused Licensed Patent and may abandon same without any prior notice or any obligation to Licensee. Both Licensee and Licensor shall make best efforts to respond promptly to any request from the other Party for input or assistance with respect to matters pertaining to the Licensed Patents. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to amend any patent application to include claims reasonably requested by the other Party and required to protect the Licensed Technology. In addition to Licensee’s obligations pursuant to section 4.1 above, Licensee shall be solely responsible for all patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) from the Effective Date onward, including all costs relating to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to the new patent agents selected by Licensee and approved by Licensor. For any patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) paid by Licensor after the Effective Date (including, without limitation, those expenses related to patentability assessments and drafting, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and taxes (the “Patent Costs”)), Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for such Patent Costs upon receipt of an invoice from Licensor for such expenses. For any work in progress with respect to the Licensed Patents for which the Patent Costs have not already been paid by Licensor to its patent firm prior to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to Licensee’s patent agent, Licensor will direct its patent firm to copy Licensee on all such invoices from said patent firm and Licensee will promptly pay said invoices directly to Licensor’s patent firm.

  • Joint Patents (i) Intrexon shall be responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining any Joint Patents at its own cost and expense, except that ARES TRADING shall be responsible for maintaining at its own cost and expense any issued Joint Patents which are requested by ARES TRADING and directed exclusively to the composition, formulation, manufacture or use of one or more Products (“Product Specific Patents”). ARES TRADING and Intrexon shall cooperate, to the extent such is reasonable and can be done without substantially compromising the value and or protection of any Inventions, to develop a suitable portfolio of Product Specific Patents and shall coordinate on the territory (country list) where protection is intended. To this end, during the Term ARES TRADING may request, at its discretion, that Intrexon file one or more continuation or divisional applications (as appropriate) within an application for Joint Patent for the express purpose of creating Product Specific Patents, which request shall be honored to the extent reasonable, permitted by applicable laws, and otherwise consistent with this Agreement. Each Joint Owner shall fully cooperate with the other Joint Owner in connection with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents. The responsible Joint Owner for a particular Joint Patent shall consult with the other Joint Owner, shall keep the other Joint Owner reasonably informed of the status of such Joint Patent, and shall promptly provide the other Joint Owner with drafts of all proposed material filings and correspondences with the patent authorities with respect to such Joint Patent for such other Joint Owner’s review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondences. The responsible Joint Owner shall confer with the other Joint Owner and take into consideration such other Joint Owner’s comments prior to submitting such filings and correspondences, provided that such other Joint Owner shall provide such comments within [*****] days of receiving the draft filings and correspondences from the responsible Joint Owner. If such other Joint Owner does not provide comments within such period of time, then such other Joint Owner shall be deemed to have no comment to such proposed filings or correspondences. In case of disagreement between the Joint Owners with respect to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents, the final decision shall be made by the responsible Joint Owner.

  • Third Party Patent Rights If either Party desires to bring an opposition, action for declaratory judgment, nullity action, interference, declaration for non-infringement, reexamination or other attack upon the validity, title or enforceability of a Patent Right owned or controlled by a Third Party and having one or more claims that Cover the Compound or Product, or the use, sale, offer for sale or importation of the Compound or Product (except insofar as such action is a counterclaim to or defense of, or accompanies a defense of, a Third Party’s claim or assertion of infringement under Section 7.6, in which case the provisions of Section 7.6 shall govern), such Party shall so notify the other Party and the Parties shall promptly confer to determine whether to bring such action or the manner in which to settle such action. Provention shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to bring, at its own expense and in its sole control, such action in the Territory. If Provention does not bring such an action in the Territory, within ninety (90) days of notification thereof pursuant to this Section 7.7(a) (or earlier, if required by the nature of the proceeding), MacroGenics shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring, at MacroGenics’ own expense, such action. The Party not bringing an action under this Section 7.7(a) shall be entitled to separate representation in such proceeding by counsel of its own choice and at its own expense, and shall cooperate fully with the Party bringing such action. Any awards or amounts received in bringing any such action shall be first allocated to reimburse the initiating Party’s expenses in such action, and any remaining amounts shall be allocated between the Parties as provided in Section 7.5(e).

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.