Decentralized MPC under arbitrary packet loss Sample Clauses

Decentralized MPC under arbitrary packet loss. In the previous section we assumed that the communication model among neighboring MPC con- trollers was faultless, so that each MPC agent could successfully receive the information about the states of its corresponding submodel. However, one of the main issues in networked control systems is the unreliability of communication channels, which may result in data packet dropout. In this sec- tion we derive a sufficient condition for ensuring convergence of the DMPC closed-loop in the case packets containing measurements are lost for an arbitrary but upper-bounded number N of consec- utive time steps. The results shown here are based on formulation (126) and rely on the open-loop asymptotic stability Assumptions 2 and 3. The issue is still non-trivial, as if a set of measures for subsystem i is lost, this would affect not only the trajectory of subsystem i because of the improper control action ui, but, due to the dynamical coupling, also the trajectories of subsystems j ∈ J, where J = {j | i ∈ Ixj ∪ Iuj}, and thus the closed-loop stability of the overall system may be endangered. By relying on open-loop stability, setting u(t) = 0 is a natural choice for backup input moves when no state measurements are available because of a communication blackout. The next theorem proves asymptotic closed-loop stability of decentralized MPC under packet loss. The proof of the theorem generalizes and unifies the results of [100, 101]. Theorem 8. Let N be a positive integer such that no more than N consecutive steps of channel transmission blackout can occur. Assume u(t) = 0 is applied when no packet is received. Let Assumptions 2, 3 hold and i = 1, . . . , M define Pi as in (127), ∆ui(t), ∆xi(t), ∆Ai, ∆Bi as in (129), ∆Y i(x(t)) as in (130), i ∆Si(x) , [2(AiWrx + Biu∗i(x))rWr + ∆Y i(x)r](Aj—1)rWiPiWrAj—1∆Y i(x) (132) and let ξi(x) , AiWirx + Biu∗0i(x). If the condition (i) Σ x′WiWi′QWiWi′x + ξi(x)′(Pi — Wi′(Aj−1)′WiPiWi′Aj−1Wi)ξi(x) — ∆Si(x) ≥ 0, 6x ∈ Rn, 6j = 1, ..., N (133a) (ii) Σ x′WiWi′QWiWi′x + ξi(x)′(Pi — Wi′(Aj−1)′WiPiWi′Aj−1Wi)ξi(x) — ∆Si(x) + u0∗i(x)′Zi′RZiu0∗i(x) — αx′x ≥ 0, 6x ∈ Rn, 6j = 1, ..., N (133b) is satisfied for some scalar α > 0, then the decentralized MPC scheme defined in (126)–(128) in closed loop with (118) is globally asymptotically stable under packet loss.

Related to Decentralized MPC under arbitrary packet loss

  • DATA LOSS The Company does not accept responsibility for the security of Your account or content. You agree that Your use of the Website or Services is at Your own risk.

  • Single Source Selection Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements of paragraph 3.10 of the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection, may, with the Association's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Originating Switched Access Detail Usage Data A category 1101XX record as defined in the EMI Telcordia Practice BR-010-200- 010.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Terms and Conditions have been renumbered as depicted in the following chart: Current Amended Section Title 4.25 4.26 Severability 4.26 4.27 Entire Agreement

  • PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS Bids offering Products that are manufactured or produced in public institutions will be rejected.

  • Interconnection Customer Compensation for Actions During Emergency Condition The CAISO shall compensate the Interconnection Customer in accordance with the CAISO Tariff for its provision of real and reactive power and other Emergency Condition services that the Interconnection Customer provides to support the CAISO Controlled Grid during an Emergency Condition in accordance with Article 11.6.

  • RECOVERY PROCEDURES 38.7.10.1 The nature and severity of any disaster will influence the recovery procedures. One crucial factor in determining how AT&T TENNESSEE will proceed with restoration is whether or not AT&T TENNESSEE’s equipment is incapacitated. Regardless of whose equipment is out of service, AT&T TENNESSEE will move as quickly as possible to aid with service recovery; however, the approach that will be taken may differ depending upon the location of the problem.

  • Convicted, Discriminatory, Antitrust Violator, and Suspended Vendor Lists In accordance with sections 287.133, 287.134, and 287.137, F.S., the Contractor is hereby informed of the provisions of sections 287.133(2)(a), 287.134(2)(a), and 287.137(2)(a), F.S. For purposes of this Contract, a person or affiliate who is on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List may not perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under the Contract. The Contractor must notify the Department if it or any of its suppliers, subcontractors, or consultants have been placed on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List during the term of the Contract. In accordance with section 287.1351, F.S., a vendor placed on the Suspended Vendor List may not enter into or renew a contract to provide any goods or services to an agency after its placement on the Suspended Vendor List. A firm or individual placed on the Suspended Vendor List pursuant to section 287.1351, F.S., the Convicted Vendor List pursuant to section 287.133, F.S., the Antitrust Violator Vendor List pursuant to section 287.137, F.S., or the Discriminatory Vendor List pursuant to section 287.134, F.S., is immediately disqualified from Contract eligibility.

  • FLORIDA CONVICTED/SUSPENDED/DISCRIMINATORY COMPLAINTS By submission of an offer, the respondent affirms that it is not currently listed in the Florida Department of Management Services Convicted/Suspended/Discriminatory Complaint Vendor List.

  • Shared Transport The Shared Transport Network Element (“Shared Transport”) provides the collective interoffice transmission facilities shared by various Carriers (including Qwest) between end-office switches and between end-office switches and local tandem switches within the Local Calling Area. Shared Transport uses the existing routing tables resident in Qwest switches to carry the End User Customer’s originating and terminating local/extended area service interoffice Local traffic on the Qwest interoffice message trunk network. CLEC traffic will be carried on the same transmission facilities between end- office switches, between end-office switches and tandem switches and between tandem switches on the same network facilities that Qwest uses for its own traffic. Shared Transport does not include use of tandem switches or transport between tandem switches and end-office switches for Local Calls that originate from end users served by non- Qwest Telecommunications Carriers (“Carrier(s)”) which terminate to QLSP End Users.