Defending Transition Property Against Claims Sample Clauses

Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer, on behalf of the Noteholders and the Certificateholders, shall institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the DTE or The Commonwealth of Massachusetts of any of their obligations or duties under the Statute, the Financing Order or any Advice Letter, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Statute or the Financing Order or the rights of holders of Transition Property by legislative enactment, voter initiative or constitutional amendment that would be adverse to the Noteholders, the Note Issuer, the Note Trustee, the Delaware Trustee, the Certificate Trustee or the Certificateholders. The costs of any such action shall be payable from RTC Charge Collections as an Operating Expense in accordance with the priorities set forth in Section 8.02(d) of the Note Indenture. The Servicer’s obligations pursuant to this Section 5.02 shall survive and continue notwithstanding the fact that the payment of Operating Expenses pursuant to Section 8.02(d) of the Note Indenture may be delayed (it being understood that the Servicer may be required to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer shall institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by each REP (at the earliest possible time) and each party to the Intercreditor Agreement of any of their respective obligations or duties under the Securitization Law, the Financing Order or the Intercreditor Agreement with respect to the Transition Property, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including without limitation defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Securitization Law or the Financing Order. The costs of any action described in this Section 5.02(d) shall be payable from SRC Collections as an Operating Expense (and shall not be deemed to constitute a portion of the Servicing Fee) in accordance with the Indenture. The Servicer’s obligations pursuant to this Section 5.02(d) shall survive and continue notwithstanding that payment of such Operating Expense may be delayed pursuant to the terms of the Indenture (it being understood that the Servicer may be required initially to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer shall institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by any REP (at the earliest possible time) of any of their respective obligations or duties under the Financing Act and the Financing Order with respect to the Transition Property, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including without limitation defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Financing Act or the Financing Order. The costs of any action described in this Section 5.02(d) shall be payable from SRC Collections as an Operating Expense (and shall not be deemed to constitute a portion of the Servicing Fee) in accordance with the Indenture. The Servicer’s obligations pursuant to this Section 5.02(d) shall survive and continue notwithstanding that payment of such Operating Expense may be delayed pursuant to the terms of the Indenture (it being understood that the Servicer may be required initially to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer shall, subject to applicable law, institute any action or Proceeding necessary to compel performance by each REP and each party to the Intercreditor Agreement (and in the case of each REP at the earliest possible time) of any of their respective obligations or duties under the Public Utility Regulatory Act, the Financing Order or the Intercreditor Agreement with respect to the Transition Property, and the Servicer agrees, subject to applicable law, to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of, or supplement to, the Public Utility Regulatory Act or the Financing Order, the Issuance Advice Letter or the rights of Transition Bondholders by legislative enactment or constitutional amendment that would be materially adverse to the Issuer, the Trustee or the Transition Bondholders. The costs of any such action shall be payable from TC Collections as an Operating Expense (and shall not be deemed to constitute a portion of the Servicing Fee) in accordance with the Indenture. The Servicer’s obligations pursuant to this Section 5.02 shall survive and continue notwithstanding the fact that the payment of Operating Expenses pursuant to the Indenture may be delayed (it being understood that the Servicer may be required initially to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer shall --------------------------------------------- institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the CPUC or the State of California of any of their obligations or duties under the PU Code, the Financing Order or any Advice Letter, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Statute or the Financing Order or the rights of holders of Transition Property by legislative enactment, voter initiative or constitutional amendment that would be adverse to Certificateholders. The costs of any such action shall be payable from FTA Collections as an Operating Expense in accordance with the priorities set forth in Section 8.02(d) of the Indenture. The Servicer's obligations pursuant to this Section 5.02 shall survive and continue notwithstanding the fact that the payment of Operating Expenses pursuant to Section 8.02(d) of the Indenture may be delayed (it being understood that the Servicer may be required to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer --------------------------------------------- shall institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the CPUC or the State of California of any of their obligations or duties under the PU Code, the Financing Order or any Advice Letter.]
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer shall, subject to applicable law, institute any action or Proceeding necessary to compel performance by each REP and each party to the Intercreditor Agreement (and in the case of each REP at the earliest possible time) of any of their respective obligations or duties under the Texas Electric Choice Plan, the Financing Order or the Intercreditor Agreement with respect to the Transition Property, and the Servicer agrees, subject to applicable law, to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of, or supplement to, the Texas Electric Choice Plan or the Financing Order. The costs of any such action shall be payable from TC Collections as an Operating Expense (and shall not be deemed to constitute a portion of the Servicing Fee) in accordance with the Indenture. The Servicer's obligations pursuant to this Section 3.10 shall survive and continue notwithstanding the fact that the payment of Operating Expenses pursuant to the Indenture may be delayed (it being understood that the Servicer may be required initially to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer shall institute any action or Proceeding necessary to compel performance by the PUCT, the State of Texas, each REP and each party to the Intercreditor Agreement (and in the case of each REP at the earliest possible time) of any of their obligations or duties under the Texas Electric Choice Plan, the Financing Order or the Intercreditor Agreement with respect to the Transition Property, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of, or supplement to, the Texas Electric Choice Plan or the Financing Order. The costs of any such action shall be payable from TC Collections as an Operating Expense in accordance with the Indenture. The Servicer's obligations pursuant to this Section 3.10 shall survive and continue notwithstanding the fact that the payment of Operating Expenses pursuant to the Indenture may be delayed (it being understood that the Servicer may be required initially to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer, on behalf of the Noteholders and the Certificateholders, shall institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the DTE or The Commonwealth of Massachusetts of any of their obligations or duties under the Statute, the Financing Order or any Advice Letter, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Statute or the Financing Order or the rights of holders of Transition Property by legislative enactment, voter initiative or constitutional amendment that would be adverse to Certificateholders. The costs of any such action shall be payable from RTC Charge Collections as an Operating Expense in accordance with the priorities set forth in Section 8.02(d) of the Note Indenture. The Servicer's obligations pursuant to this Section 5.02 shall survive and continue notwithstanding the fact that the payment of Operating Expenses pursuant to Section 8.02(d) of the Note Indenture may be delayed (it being understood that the Servicer may be required to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder).
Defending Transition Property Against Claims. The Servicer, on behalf of the Holders, shall institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the PUCT, the State of Texas, each REP and each party to the Intercreditor Agreement (and in the case of each REP at the earliest possible time) of any of their respective obligations or duties under the Securitization Law, any Financing Order, any Issuance Advice Letter, True-Up Adjustment, any Tariff, any Amendatory Tariff or the Intercreditor Agreement, and the Servicer agrees to take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to or judicial invalidation of the Securitization Law or any Financing Order or the rights of holders of Transition Property by legislative enactment, voter initiative or constitutional amendment that would be materially adverse to Holders or which would cause an impairment of the rights of the Note Issuer or the Holders. In any proceedings related to the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any municipality to acquire a portion of CPL's electric distribution facilities, the Servicer shall assert that the court ordering such condemnation must treat such municipality as a successor to CPL under the Securitization Law and Financing Order. The costs of any such action shall be payable by the Seller pursuant to Section 5.01(h) of the Sale Agreement.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!