DEFINITION OF COMPARABLE EVALUATIONS. A. The definition of comparable evaluations shall be as follows: 1. The rating scale for comparable evaluations shall be determined by a numerical scale based upon a three (3) year weighted average. 2. Points for each evaluation rating shall be awarded based upon the following scale: a. Accomplished = 4 points b. Skilled = 3 points c. Developing = 2 points d. Ineffective = 0 points 3. The sum of the ratings over three (3) years shall be applied to the following scale to determine comparable evaluations: A = 10-12 points B = 6-9 points C = 0-5 points Thus, this teacher would be assigned to category A for determining comparable evaluations. 4. Where only one (1) evaluation is available, the category would be determined by multiplying the teacher numerical rating by three (3). Thus, this teacher would be assigned to category B for determining comparable evaluations. 5. Where only two (2) evaluations are available, the ratings for both years would be added, and the result would be multiplied by the number 1.5 to determine the comparable category. Example: A teacher with two (2) years of evaluations with both evaluation ratings as “Developing.” The comparable category for this teacher would be computed as follows: Thus, this teacher would be assigned to comparable category B. B. A bargaining unit member who is notified that he/she is to have his/her contract suspended will have the right to bump the least senior member whose position he/she is certified/licensed to fill, so long as the evaluation ratings are comparable.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Negotiated Agreement, Negotiated Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
DEFINITION OF COMPARABLE EVALUATIONS. A. The definition of comparable evaluations shall be as follows:
1. The rating scale for comparable evaluations shall be determined by a numerical scale based upon a three (3) year weighted average.
2. Points for each evaluation rating shall be awarded based upon the following scale:
a. Accomplished = 4 points b. Skilled = 3 points c. Developing = 2 points d. Ineffective = 0 points
3. The sum of the ratings over three (3) years shall be applied to the following scale to determine comparable evaluations: A = 10-12 points B = 6-9 points C = 0-5 points Thus, this teacher would be assigned to category A for determining comparable evaluations.
4. Where only one (1) evaluation is available, the category would be determined by multiplying the teacher numerical rating by three (3). Skilled (3) x 3 = 9 Thus, this teacher would be assigned to category B for determining comparable evaluations.
5. Where only two (2) evaluations are available, the ratings for both years would be added, and the result would be multiplied by the number 1.5 to determine the comparable category. Example: A teacher with two (2) years of evaluations with both evaluation ratings as “Developing.” The comparable category for this teacher would be computed as follows: Thus, this teacher would be assigned to comparable category B.
B. A bargaining unit member who is notified that he/she is to have his/her contract suspended will have the right to bump the least senior member whose position he/she is certified/licensed to fill, so long as the evaluation ratings are comparable.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
