Disputes Over Charging Methodologies Sample Clauses

Disputes Over Charging Methodologies. The parties acknowledge that the Pole Attachment Act grants the FCC regulatory authority over the rates, terms, and conditions of access to poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way. The parties further acknowledge that, as of the date of this Agreement, this State has not elected to assume reverse preemptive regulatory authority over such rates, terms, and conditions by certifying to the FCC that it has made such election. Accordingly, complaints concerning and challenges to SWBT’s charging methodologies shall be brought, in the first instance, before the FCC in accordance with FCC procedural rules unless this State elects to preempt FCC regulation of pole attachment rates, terms, and conditions of access; provided, however, that nothing contained in this section shall be construed as affecting the right of either party to seek relief from any court or agency of competent jurisdiction in connection with the negotiation, arbitration, and approval of interconnection agreements under 47 U.S.C. § 252.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Disputes Over Charging Methodologies

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Adjustments and Prorations The following adjustments and prorations shall be made at Closing:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!