DMS Review Sample Clauses

DMS Review. In the event the transfer dispute cannot be resolved through mediation as set forth above, CONTRACTOR, or the FDC Secretary, or designee, may file a written request with the Secretary of DMS for review. The Secretary of DMS, or designee, shall schedule and evaluate the transfer dispute within a reasonable time of the written request. CONTRACTOR and the FDC Secretary, or designee, shall receive timely notification of the date, time, and location of the DMS meeting to review the transfer dispute. CONTRACTOR and FDC may provide written documentation regarding the transfer dispute for consideration by the Secretary of DMS, or designee. The CONTRACTOR and FDC shall ensure all pertinent or requested documentation is provided to the Secretary of DMS, or designee, as directed before the scheduled DMS meeting. The CONTRACTOR and FDC agree to be bound by the transport dispute decision of the Secretary of DMS, or designee.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DMS Review. In the event the transfer dispute cannot be resolved through mediation as set forth above, CONTRACTOR or DC's Secretary or designee may file a written request with the Secretary of DMS for review. The Secretary of DMS or designee shall schedule and conduct the review of the transfer dispute within a reasonable time of the written request. CONTRACTOR and DC's Secretary or his designee, shall receive timely notification of the date, time, and location of DMS meeting at which the transfer dispute will be reviewed. CONTRACTOR and DC may provide written documentation regarding the transfer dispute for consideration by the Secretary of DMS or designee. CONTRACTOR and DC shall ensure all pertinent or requested documentation is provided to the Secretary of DMS or designee as directed or otherwise prior to the scheduled DMS meeting. CONTRACTOR and DC agree to be bound by the final decision of the Secretary of DMS or designee as to resolution of the transfer dispute.
Sample 1

Related to DMS Review

  • Claims Review The IRO shall perform the Claims Review annually to cover each of the five Reporting Periods. The IRO shall perform all components of each Claims Review.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!