Drone Impersonation Attack Sample Clauses

Drone Impersonation Attack. Xxxxxxx the intruder attempts to impersonate ℛ in order to generate the following message: 2 = ( , , , , , , , ) Such attempt will, in turn, demand extensive computations in order to generate the variables , and . The mathematical relations along with the inherent calculation requirements are given as follows: 1. = + ( ‖ ‖ ‖ )( + ) For to execute such equation, it is essential for to extract the values of and from the relations Ω= ε. and = . respectively. 2. = ( ‖ ) Here, to approach the value of , is required to solve the following equation: = ( ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ ). This, in turn, demands calculation to generate and using the relations = . and = . respectively. • It decrypts = ( ) and checks for the freshness of • It checks for certificate of the source drone by applying the condition: ( + . ( ‖ )) ≟ . . checks for the relation: (. + ( +
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drone Impersonation Attack. Xxxxxxx the intruder 𝒜 attempts to impersonate 𝒟ℛ𝒩𝑣 in order to generate the following message: 𝛹2 = ( 𝑁𝑂𝑁𝑒𝑢𝑣 , 𝛺𝑣, 𝛬𝑣, 𝒷𝑣, 𝒳𝑣, 𝒞𝓇𝑣, 𝒱𝒦𝑢𝑣 , 𝐼𝐷𝑣 ) Such attempt will, in turn, demand extensive computations in order to generate the variables 𝛬𝑣, 𝒱𝒦𝑢𝑣 and 𝑁𝑂𝑁𝑒𝑢𝑣 . The mathematical relations along with the inherent calculation requirements are given as follows: 1. 𝛬𝑣 = 𝒞𝓇𝑣 + 𝒽( 𝐼𝐷𝑣 ‖𝒞𝓇𝑣 ‖ 𝒷𝑣‖ 𝒳𝑣 )( 𝜀𝑣 + 𝒶𝑣 ) For 𝛬𝑣 to execute such equation, it is essential for to extract the values of 𝜀𝑣 and 𝒶𝑣from the relations Ω𝑣= ε𝑣. 𝐷and 𝒷𝑣 = 𝒶𝑣. 𝐷 respectively. 2. 𝒱𝒦𝑢𝑣 = 𝒽( 𝑁𝑂𝑁𝑒𝑢𝑣 ‖ 𝒦𝑢𝑣)
Drone Impersonation Attack. In this attack, attempts to pose as a genuine entity on behalf of a registered drone DRj. After that, A tries to generate a legitimate message Msg3′ = {Certj∗, SKV2, T2, IDj∗, TS3}. To achieve this goal, A needs to select a random nonce rd′ and a timestamp TS3′ , and try to compute T2′ = h(LC rd′ IDj TS2 TS3′ ) V4x. But, without knowledge of the secret information such as LC and IDj, cannot construct the message Msg3′ . Therefore, cannot impersonate as a legitimate drone. This implies that BioKA-ASVN is protected against the drone impersonation attack.

Related to Drone Impersonation Attack

  • Malicious Use of Orphan Glue Records Registry Operator shall take action to remove orphan glue records (as defined at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/committees/security/sac048.pdf) when provided with evidence in written form that such records are present in connection with malicious conduct.

  • Denial/Restoral OSS Charge In the event <<customer_name>> provides a list of customers to be denied and restored, rather than an LSR, each location on the list will require a separate PON and, therefore will be billed as one LSR per location. <<customer_name>> will incur an OSS charge for an accepted LSR that is later canceled by <<customer_name>>. Note: Supplements or clarifications to a previously billed LSR will not incur another OSS charge. <<customer_name>> will incur the mechanized rate for all LSRs, both mechanized and manual, if the percentage of mechanized LSRs to total LSRs meets or exceeds the threshold percentages shown below: Year Ratio: Mechanized/Total LSRs 2000 80% 2001 90% The threshold plan will be discontinued in 2002. BellSouth will track the total LSR volume for each CLEC for each quarter. At the end of that time period, a Percent Electronic LSR calculation will be made for that quarter based on the LSR data tracked in the LCSC. If this percentage exceeds the threshold volume, all of that CLEC’s future manual LSRs for the following quarter will be billed at the mechanized LSR rate. To allow time for obtaining and analyzing the data and updating the billing system, this billing change will take place on the first day of the second month following the end of the quarter (e.g. May 1 for 1Q, Aug 1 for 2Q, etc.). There will be no adjustments to the amount billed for previously billed LSRs. Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount Resale Discount 1 Grandfathered Services (Note 1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Mobile Services Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 9 Federal Subscriber Line Charges Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 11 End User Line Chg- Number Portability Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 12 Public Telephone Access Svc(PTAS) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 13 Inside Wire Maint Service Plan Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Applicable Notes:

  • Data Security and Unauthorized Data Release The Requester and Approved Users, including the Requester’s IT Director, acknowledge NIH’s expectation that they have reviewed and agree to manage the requested controlled-access dataset(s) and any Data Derivatives of controlled-access datasets according to NIH’s expectations set forth in the current NIH Security Best Practices for Controlled-Access Data Subject to the GDS Policy and the Requester’s IT security requirements and policies. The Requester, including the Requester’s IT Director, agree that the Requester’s IT security requirements and policies are sufficient to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the NIH controlled-access data entrusted to the Requester. If approved by NIH to use cloud computing for the proposed research project, as outlined in the Research and Cloud Computing Use Statements of the Data Access Request, the Requester acknowledges that the IT Director has reviewed and understands the cloud computing guidelines in the NIH Security Best Practices for Controlled-Access Data Subject to the NIH GDS Policy. The Requester and PI agree to notify the appropriate DAC(s) of any unauthorized data sharing, breaches of data security, or inadvertent data releases that may compromise data confidentiality within 24 hours of when the incident is identified. As permitted by law, notifications should include any known information regarding the incident and a general description of the activities or process in place to define and remediate the situation fully. Within 3 business days of the DAC notification, the Requester agrees to submit to the DAC(s) a detailed written report including the date and nature of the event, actions taken or to be taken to remediate the issue(s), and plans or processes developed to prevent further problems, including specific information on timelines anticipated for action. The Requester agrees to provide documentation verifying that the remediation plans have been implemented. Repeated violations or unresponsiveness to NIH requests may result in further compliance measures affecting the Requester. NIH, or another entity designated by NIH may, as permitted by law, also investigate any data security incident or policy violation. Approved Users and their associates agree to support such investigations and provide information, within the limits of applicable local, state, tribal, and federal laws and regulations. In addition, Requester and Approved Users agree to work with the NIH to assure that plans and procedures that are developed to address identified problems are mutually acceptable and consistent with applicable law.

  • CLEARANCE PATTERNS 7.1 The State shall develop separate clearance patterns for each of the following: Vendor Account Payroll Account AHS-PATH Account Unemployment Insurance Benefits Account Federal Highway Planning & Construction Program (Vendor Account) 7.2 The following shall develop the State's clearance patterns: The State of Vermont-Department of Finance and Management 7.3 The sources of data the State shall use when developing its clearance patterns are as follows: Vendor account-State's central accounting system Unemployment Insurance Benefits Account-Department of Labor bank records All other accounts-Bank files from the State Treasurer's Office 7.4 The State shall use the following methodology when developing its clearance patterns: When developing each clearance pattern, the State shall track at least 99% of the funds disbursed, from issuance to clearance, for a period of at least three months. 7.5 The State shall identify for each check or warrant (hereafter, check) in the population: (1) the date the check was released for payment; (2) the date the check was debited from the State's account, and, (3) the amount of the check. 7.6 The State shall use the following method to calculate the dollar-weighted average day of clearance: To determine the number of days each check was outstanding (clearance time), the issue date shall be subtracted from the date the check cleared the State's account. To determine the percentage of the disbursement paid out each day following issuance, the amount of the checks that clear the State's account each day shall be summed and then divided by the amount of the total disbursement. For each day following issuance, the clearance time of the checks paid out that day shall be multiplied by the percentage of the total disbursement those checks represent. This product is the clearance factor. The dollar-weighted average day of clearance for the disbursement shall be determined by summing the clearance factor of each day following the disbursement. 7.7 The State shall adjust each clearance pattern to reflect the dollar-weighted proportion of funds paid out by EFT/Direct payroll, with the following exceptions: All Accounts - An adjustment is not necessary since the State includes all payments in its clearance pattern calculations, including those paid electronically. The State shall also adjust each clearance pattern to reflect: n/a 7.8 Each of the State's clearance patterns is calculated in calendar days. 7.9 An authorized State official shall certify that each clearance pattern developed by the State accurately corresponds to the clearance activity of the programs to which it is applied. This certification shall be provided to the Fiscal Service prior to the effective date of the Agreement. The State shall recertify its clearance patterns at least every five years. 7.10 The State shall follow the procedures of 31 CFR 205 if it has actual or constructive knowledge, at any time, that a clearance pattern does not correspond to a program's clearance activity.

  • Rectification of Safety Hazard Where, because of the existence of a safety hazard, a site has been stopped for a defined period of time and Employees sent off site by agreement between Site Managers and any combination of Union Official/s, Health and Safety Committee, those people who remain on site to do rectification work will be paid at the rate of double time for all such work.

  • Substance Abuse Treatment Information Substance abuse treatment information shall be maintained in compliance with 42 C.F.R. Part 2 if the Party or subcontractor(s) are Part 2 covered programs, or if substance abuse treatment information is received from a Part 2 covered program by the Party or subcontractor(s).

  • Mail Order Catalog Warnings In the event that, the Settling Entity prints new catalogs and sells units of the Products via mail order through such catalogs to California consumers or through its customers, the Settling Entity shall provide a warning for each unit of such Product both on the label in accordance with subsection 2.4 above, and in the catalog in a manner that clearly associates the warning with the specific Product being purchased. Any warning provided in a mail order catalog shall be in the same type size or larger than other consumer information conveyed for such Product within the catalog and shall be located on the same display page of the item. The catalog warning may use the Short-Form Warning content described in subsection 2.3(b) if the language provided on the Product label also uses the Short-Form Warning.

  • Data Storage Where required by applicable law, Student Data shall be stored within the United States. Upon request of the LEA, Provider will provide a list of the locations where Student Data is stored.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!