Common use of Evaluation and Selection Process Clause in Contracts

Evaluation and Selection Process. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committee. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsive. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s ranking: Evaluation Category Maximum Possible Pts. Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Xxxxxxx 0 XXX 0000 Xxxxx/Xxxxxxxx Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, Purchase Orders, & Environmental 49 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 Section 7 – Pricing Models and discounts proposed 260 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Total Points Possible: 798 pts. Except for Cost Information, all evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.

Evaluation and Selection Process. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committee. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsive. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s ranking: Evaluation Category Maximum Possible Pts. Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Xxxxxxx 0 XXX 0000 XxxxxSection 2 PUR 1001 Agree/Xxxxxxxx Disagree Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, Purchase Xxxxxxxx Orders, & Environmental 49 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 Section 7 – Pricing Models and discounts proposed 260 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Total Points Possible: 798 pts. Except for Cost Information, all evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.

Evaluation and Selection Process. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ ’ submittals. Top-While award will mainly be based upon the best price, the Department reserves the right to invite top scoring Respondents will be invited respondents to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committeenegotiate their offerings and proposed pricing. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsivenon-responsive by the Department, at its discretion. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s Respondent’s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP ITN document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below table, below, for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s Respondent’s ranking: Evaluation Category Maximum Possible Pts. Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Xxxxxxx 0 XXX 0000 XxxxxSection 1 – Respondent is a LAR Pass/Xxxxxxxx Fail Section 2 – PUR 1001 Agree/Disagree Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 3 – Vendor Certifications 100 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, Purchase Orders, & Environmental 49 Special Contract Conditions 75 Section 5 - Track record of Vendor in meeting commitments (verified through references and vendor performance tracking within MFMP) 50 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 60 Section 7 – Pricing Models Models, Strategies and discounts Commitments proposed 260 140 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Total Points Possible: 798 449 pts. Except for Cost Information, all All evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.

Evaluation and Selection Process. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committee. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsive. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s ranking: Evaluation Category Maximum Possible Pts. Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Xxxxxxx 0 XXX 0000 Xxxxx/Xxxxxxxx Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, Purchase Xxxxxxxx Orders, & Environmental 49 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 Section 7 – Pricing Models and discounts proposed 260 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Total Points Possible: 798 pts. Except for Cost Information, all evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.