Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Coaches. The criterion for evaluation shall be the quality of service in the following categories: 6.8.1 Administration and conduct of the assigned sport (e.g., adherence to institutional policies and applicable external rules governing the sport, 6.8.2 Relationship with student athletes (e.g., recruitment of qualified student athletes, maintenance of acceptable graduation rates as established by the institution and team management). 6.8.3 Record of student athletes in competitive performance (e.g., program development, record of successful competitions). 6.8.4 Productive service to the department and University. 6.8.5 Years in rank.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Coaches. The criterion for evaluation shall be the quality of service in the following categories:
6.8.1 Administration and conduct of the assigned sport (e.g., adherence to institutional policies and applicable external rules governing the sport,, fund raising, budget management, general program organization and administration).
6.8.2 Relationship with student athletes (e.g., recruitment of qualified student athletes, maintenance of acceptable graduation rates as established by the institution and team management).
6.8.3 Record of student athletes in competitive performance (e.g., program development, record of successful competitions).
6.8.4 Productive service to the department and University.
6.8.5 Years in rank.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Coaches. The criterion for evaluation shall be the quality of service in the following categories:
6.8.1 Administration and conduct of the assigned sport (e.g., adherence to institutional policies and applicable external rules governing the sport,, fund raising, budget management, general program organization and admin-istration).
6.8.2 Relationship with student athletes (e.g., recruitment of qualified student athletes, maintenance of acceptable graduation rates as established by the institution and team management).
6.8.3 Record of student athletes in competitive performance (e.g., program development, record of successful competitions).
6.8.4 Productive service to the department and University.
6.8.5 Years in rank.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Coaches. The criterion for evaluation shall sh all be the quality of service in the following categories:
6.8.1 Administration and conduct of the assigned sport (e.g., adherence to institutional policies and applicable external rules governing the sport,, fund raising, budget management, general program organization and administration).
6.8.2 Relationship with student athletes (e.g., recruitment of qualified student athletes, maintenance of acceptable graduation rates as established by the institution and team management).
6.8.3 Record of student athletes in competitive performance (e.g., program development, record of successful competitions).
6.8.4 Productive service to the department and University.
6.8.5 Years in rank.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Coaches. The criterion for evaluation shall be the quality of service in the following categories:
6.8.1 Administration and conduct of the assigned sport (e.g., adherence to institutional policies and applicable external rules governing the sport,the
6.8.2 Relationship with student athletes (e.g., recruitment of qualified student athletes, maintenance of acceptable graduation rates as established by the institution and team management).
6.8.3 Record of student athletes in competitive performance (e.g., program development, record of successful competitions).
6.8.4 Productive service to the department and University.
6.8.5 Years in rank.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
