Evaluation Report. 20.5.4.1 The summary evaluation report shall be prepared by the Faculty Evaluation Committee and administrative evaluator(s) and shall include each evaluator’s individual rating. The summary evaluation report shall take into account the results of each of the evaluation components (Section 20.5.3) in order to arrive at an overall rating. When the committee and the administrative evaluator(s) cannot reach an agreement as to the overall rating, the report must include written explanation. 20.5.4.2 If the Faculty Evaluation Committee reaches a consensus of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” or if the administrative evaluator(s) indicates a “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory”, then the evaluators shall develop a written improvement plan. The plan shall include (a) specific areas of needed improvement, (b) means of improvement, (c) resources available to the evaluatee, and (d) a timeframe within which the improvement is to be accomplished. The improvement plan will be included in the summary evaluation report which is presented to the evaluatee at the evaluation conference. In the event that a contract faculty member receives a “Needs Improvement” and/or “Unsatisfactory” rating, fulfillment of the improvement plan shall be assessed in the next evaluation. The Faculty Evaluation Committee shall continue, to the extent possible, with the same members until the evaluatee’s performance has reached a satisfactory level or other appropriate administrative action takes place.
Appears in 5 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
