Common use of Evidence and Artifacts Clause in Contracts

Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete the evaluation. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. A teacher is expected to submit artifacts for completion of the evaluation. 2. The District commits to documenting evidence of performance available via observation to the greatest extent possible to lessen the time required by teachers to compile additional artifacts. If, after completing the minimum required observations, both the teacher and evaluator agree on the score for a criterion, no additional evidence is required to be collected for that criterion. It is the intent of the parties that every effort will be made to provide and collect ample evidence of proficiency. It is the nature and quality of the evidence, not the amount that determines its rating. The evaluator may request evidence in areas not yet consistent with a proficient rating but may not require a specific amount of evidence or number of artifacts. 3. The teacher may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated into the eVAL Observation Report Form prior to the post-observation conference and be used to determine the final evaluation score.

Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the teacher and the evaluator will may contribute artifacts that supplement other evidence collected and used to evidence collection necessary to complete determine the evaluationoverall assessment of professional performance. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. A teacher is expected to submit artifacts for completion Evidence shall result from the normal course of professional performance during the evaluationperiod of time being evaluated. 2. The District commits to documenting evidence of performance readily available via observation observations to the greatest extent possible so as to lessen the time required by teachers to compile additional artifacts. If, after completing the minimum required observations, both the teacher and evaluator agree on the score for a criterion, no additional evidence is required to be collected for that criterion. It is the intent of the parties that every effort will be made to provide and collect ample evidence of proficiency. It is the nature and quality of the evidence, not the amount that determines its rating. The evaluator Principals may request evidence in areas not yet consistent with a proficient rating but may not require a specific amount of evidence or number of artifacts. 3. The teacher may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated into the eVAL Observation Report Form observation report prior to the post-observation conference and be used to determine the final evaluation score.

Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete the evaluation. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. A teacher is expected to submit artifacts for completion of the evaluation. 2. The District commits to documenting evidence of performance available via observation and conversations to the greatest extent possible to lessen the time required by teachers to compile additional artifacts. If, after completing the minimum required observations, both the teacher and evaluator agree on the score for a criterion, no additional evidence is required to be collected for that criterion. It is the intent of the parties that every effort will be made to provide and collect ample evidence of proficiency. It is the nature and quality of the evidence, not the amount that determines its rating. The evaluator may request evidence in areas not yet consistent with a proficient rating but may not require a specific amount of evidence or number of artifacts. 3. The teacher may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated into the eVAL Observation Report Form prior to the post-observation conference and be used to determine the final evaluation score.