Common use of Future Allowances Clause in Contracts

Future Allowances. Parties are transacting in a milieu in which rules are often not yet fully set and likely to change mid-stream. The only thing certain about change in law risks is that there will be change in law risks that the drafters did not anticipate. One possible change in law risk that the parties may wish to consider is the potential for future programs providing allowances to renewable energy facilities based on facility capacity, but not generation. This is distinct from credits (or allowances) provided on account of actual renewable resource generation. A “Standard REC,” which is “all” Environmental Attributes, includes within it any future allowances (or credits) that are awarded based on the measured quantity of generation with which the Standard REC was associated. If the parties do not wish to transfer future potential allowances or credits, they should elect to trade a “Specified REC” and use the Disclosure Document to carve those out. The working group included all such future allowances or benefits associated with generation with a Standard REC, viewing the sale of the Standard REC as a derivative of the energy, with the Standard REC buyer being the fixed price payor. Although the Standard REC seller is not paying a floating price, it is receiving a steady and fixed, defined cash flow that it can use to ensure the economics of its project, and foregoing the floating price (which the buyer is receiving), which is the fluctuation in any future value inherent in what was sold for that fixed price. That floating value may increase if there is a new program, or decline if an existing program is cancelled. Meanwhile, the seller continues to receive the fixed price from the seller. This illustration is, of course, subject to the further elections and decisions of the parties in how they allocate change in law risk. So if, for example, under the new California greenhouse gas emissions law, an allowance-based compliance regime is created and initial allowances are allocated to all existing generation, fossil and non-fossil fueled generation, and these allowances are allocated in an aggregate amount, and for example a wind facility is given in a table 100 Carbon Allowances, which it does not need for compliance, has the wind facility which sold a Standard REC sold any of its carbon allowances? If the allowances were for identifiable prior generation, and a buyer paid for them, they were transferred. If the allocation of allowances is made on an on-going future basis, as electricity is generated, and the amount of allowances is keyed to actual energy production, the allowances are part of the Standard REC. But the allocation of allowances is based on historic output of the unit does not result in the transfer of the allowances to those to whom the past performance was sold. A system which allocates allowances based on some formula other than on-going actual generation of energy is very different from a system that gives credit for displacing emissions based on actual generation of energy from a renewable resource. The drafters have sought to be as clear as possible under the circumstances, but the parties are advised to remain informed about the potential for future allowance and credit-based programs which might apply to their units and draft their transactions accordingly. Parties may consider adding the following language to the definition of Environmental Attributes: Environmental Attributes do not include, unless the parties have expressly agreed otherwise, tradable emission allowances or other entitlements to produce emissions issued by a Governmental Authority and allocated to a Renewable Energy Facility on a basis other than actual generation of avoided emissions associated with the generation of electricity by the Renewable Energy Facility. For example, any CO2 emission allowances that may be allocated to a Renewable Energy Facility by a Governmental Authority on a basis other than a calculation of such Facility’s actual avoided emissions would not be included as an Environmental Attribute.

Future Allowances. Parties are transacting in a milieu in which rules are often not yet fully set and likely to change mid-stream. The only thing certain about change in law risks is that there will be change in law risks that the drafters did not anticipate. One possible change in law risk that the parties may wish to consider is the potential for future programs providing allowances to renewable energy facilities based on facility capacity, but not generation. This is distinct from credits (or allowances) provided on account of actual renewable resource generation. A “Standard Stand­ard REC,” which is “all” Environmental Attributes, includes within it any future allowances (or credits) that are awarded based on the measured quantity of generation with which the Standard REC was associated. If the parties do not wish to transfer future potential allowances or credits, they should elect to trade a “Specified REC” and use the Disclosure Document to carve those out. The working group included all such future allowances or benefits associated with generation with a Standard REC, viewing the sale of the Standard REC as a derivative of the energy, with the Standard REC buyer being the fixed price payor. Although the Standard REC seller is not paying a floating price, it is receiving a steady and fixed, defined cash flow that it can use to ensure the economics of its project, and foregoing the floating price (which the buyer is receivingreceiv­ing), which is the fluctuation in any future value inherent in what was sold for that fixed price. That floating value may increase if there is a new program, or decline if an existing program is cancelled. Meanwhile, the seller continues to receive the fixed price from the seller. This illustration illus­tration is, of course, subject to the further elections and decisions of the parties in how they allocate allo­cate change in law risk. So if, for example, under the new California greenhouse gas emissions law, an allowance-based compliance regime is created and initial allowances are allocated to all existing generation, fossil and non-fossil fueled generation, and these allowances allow­an­ces are allocated in an aggregate amount, and for example a wind facility is given in a table 100 Carbon Allowances, which it does not need for compliance, has the wind facility which sold a Standard REC sold any of its carbon allowances? If the allowances were for identifiable prior generation, and a buyer paid for them, they were transferred. If the allocation of allowances is made on an on-going future basis, as electricity is generated, and the amount of allowances is keyed to actual energy production, the allowances are part of the Standard REC. But the allocation of allowances is based on historic output of the unit does not result in the transfer of the allowances to those to whom the past performance was sold. A system which allocates allowances based on some formula other than on-going actual generation of energy is very different from a system that gives credit for displacing emissions based on actual generation of energy from a renewable resource. The drafters have sought to be as clear as possible under the circumstancescircumstan­ces, but the parties are advised to remain informed about the potential for future allowance and credit-based programs which might apply to their units and draft their transactions accordingly. Parties may consider adding the following language to the definition of Environmental Attributes: Environmental Attributes do not include, unless the parties have expressly agreed otherwise, tradable emission allowances or other entitlements to produce emissions issued by a Governmental Authority and allocated to a Renewable Energy Facility on a basis other than actual generation of avoided emissions associated with the generation of electricity by the Renewable Energy Facility. For example, any CO2 emission allowances that may be allocated to a Renewable Energy Facility by a Governmental Authority on a basis other than a calculation of such Facility’s actual avoided emissions would not be included as an Environmental Attribute.

Future Allowances. Parties are transacting in a milieu in which rules are often not yet fully set and likely to change mid-stream. The only thing certain about change in law risks is that there will be change in law risks that the drafters did not anticipate. One possible change in law risk that the parties may wish to consider is the potential for future programs providing allowances to renewable energy facilities based on facility capacity, but not generation. This is distinct from credits (or allowances) provided on account of actual renewable resource generation. A “Standard REC,” which is “all” Environmental Attributes, includes within it any future allowances (or credits) that are awarded based on the measured quantity of generation with which the Standard REC was associated. If the parties do not wish to transfer future potential allowances or credits, they should elect to trade a “Specified REC” and use the Disclosure Document to carve those out. The working group included all such future allowances or benefits associated with generation with a Standard REC, viewing the sale of the Standard REC as a derivative of the energy, with the Standard REC buyer being the fixed price payor. Although the Standard REC seller is not paying a floating price, it is receiving a steady and fixed, defined cash flow that it can use to ensure the economics of its project, and foregoing the floating price (which the buyer is receiving), which is the fluctuation in any future value inherent in what was sold for that fixed price. That floating value may increase if there is a new program, or decline if an existing program is cancelled. Meanwhile, the seller continues to receive the fixed price from the seller. This illustration is, of course, subject to the Posted: February 6, 2018 further elections and decisions of the parties in how they allocate change in law risk. So if, for example, under the new California greenhouse gas emissions law, an allowance-based compliance regime is created and initial allowances are allocated to all existing generation, fossil and non-fossil fueled generation, and these allowances are allocated in an aggregate amount, and for example a wind facility is given in a table 100 Carbon Allowances, which it does not need for compliance, has the wind facility which sold a Standard REC sold any of its carbon allowances? If the allowances were for identifiable prior generation, and a buyer paid for them, they were transferred. If the allocation of allowances is made on an on-going future basis, as electricity is generated, and the amount of allowances is keyed to actual energy production, the allowances are part of the Standard REC. But the allocation of allowances is based on historic output of the unit does not result in the transfer of the allowances to those to whom the past performance was sold. A system which allocates allowances based on some formula other than on-going actual generation of energy is very different from a system that gives credit for displacing emissions based on actual generation of energy from a renewable resource. The drafters have sought to be as clear as possible under the circumstances, but the parties are advised to remain informed about the potential for future allowance and credit-based programs which might apply to their units and draft their transactions accordingly. Parties may consider adding the following language to the definition of Environmental Attributes: Environmental Attributes do not include, unless the parties have expressly agreed otherwise, tradable emission allowances or other entitlements to produce emissions issued by a Governmental Authority and allocated to a Renewable Energy Facility on a basis other than actual generation of avoided emissions associated with the generation of electricity by the Renewable Energy Facility. For example, any CO2 emission allowances that may be allocated to a Renewable Energy Facility by a Governmental Authority on a basis other than a calculation of such Facility’s actual avoided emissions would not be included as an Environmental Attribute.