GMP Open Book Review Process Sample Clauses

GMP Open Book Review Process. The CM/GC shall meet with the Owner and EOR to review the GMP deliverables and its GMP Supporting Documents. The CM/GC shall make available to designate the Owner personnel including its Owner’s Representative, EOR, the complete cost estimate and supporting documents including, but not limited to books, calculations, take-offs, productivity assumptions, internal equipment rates, risk and contingency assumptions, exclusions, cost data in support of Construction General Conditions, quotations, allowances and provisions sums. The Owner will provide confidentiality assurances to the CM/GC as is necessary to allow the Owner to perform its construction price analysis and review. This “Open Book Process” will be repeated and required when the CM/GC submits its cost estimate, preliminary GMP, Updated GMP and Final GMP. If the Owner or its consultants discover any inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the information presented, the Owner will promptly notify the CM/GC, who shall make appropriate adjustments to the GMP proposal, its basis or both.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to GMP Open Book Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.