History of Violation. When there is a history of repeat violations, the Enforcement Policy requires a minimum multiplier of 1.1, with higher values as appropriate. When there is no history of repeat violations, a neutral factor of 1.0 is used. Board staff is unaware of prior similar violations and therefore, a neutral multiplier of 1.0 is appropriate.
History of Violation. When there is a history of repeat violations, the Enforcement Policy requires a minimum multiplier of
History of Violation. The Prosecution Team assigns a history of violation multiplier of 1.0 because the Discharger does not have a history of violations.
History of Violation. 1.0 When there is a history of repeat violations, the Enforcement Policy requires a minimum multiplier of 1.1, with higher values as appropriate. The Dischargers do not have a history of adjudicated violations; therefore, a multiplier of 1.0 is appropriate.
History of Violation. When there is a history of repeat violations, the Enforcement Policy indicates a minimum multiplier of 1.1 to be used. Board staff understands that the Discharger has drained Priest Reservoir in the past, but this is the first event for which there was a complaint and a subsequent investigation. Therefore, the History of Violation factor is 1.0.
History of Violation. When there is a history of repeat violations, the Enforcement Policy requires a minimum multiplier of 1.1, with higher values as appropriate. The Discharger has been issued two previous CDOs, multiple NOVs and a previous ACL by the Board. Therefore, a History of Violation multiplier of 1.3 was used for this factor.
History of Violation. See History of Violation discussion under Violation 2. As score of 1.4 was assessed.
History of Violation. When there is a history of repeat violations, the Enforcement Policy requires a minimum multiplier of 1.1 to be used. The Discharger has not had previous violations caused by the power supply failure and computer operation system failure. Therefore, the Discharger was given a value of 1.0.
