Enforcement Policy. The Service Provider will be responsible to enforce the disciplinary policies outlined in their Safety Program or Operating Procedures and will make copies available of such to the City of North Battleford upon request. The City of North Battleford reserves the right to have any of the Service Provider’s employees or agents removed and / or banned from any City of North Battleford site for blatant disregard of site rules or safety requirements.
Enforcement Policy. On November 17, 2010, the State Water Board adopted Resolution No. 2009-0083 amending the Water Quality Enforcement Policy (Enforcement Policy). The Enforcement Policy was approved by the Office of Administrative Law and became effective on May 20, 2010. The Enforcement Policy establishes a methodology for assessing administrative civil liability. In light of substantial negotiations having occurred prior to May 20, 2010, the Parties agree to the use of the Enforcement Policy adopted in 2002 for this Stipulation and Order.
Enforcement Policy. To consider and agree key policy documents To be aware of the joint service policy in respect to prosecutions and other disposals. To maintain financial oversight of the Service to ensure sound financial management. To propose fee structure, annual budget to the Councils and agree any variations from the budget from the Inter Authority Agreement. To quarterly review the budget monitoring information Monitor the budget, approve spend in accordance with Standing Orders for financial processes. Provide budget monitoring reports to the JMB and JC. To monitor delivery of the Business To provide support and guidance To provide annual reports to the Case including delivery of savings and additional income. to the Joint Management Team to assist achievement of delivering the Business Case. JMB/JC on delivery of the business case. To receive reports on the performance of the Inter Authority Agreement. To identify defaults against the Inter Authority Agreement and resolve these to the satisfaction of both Councils. To monitor operational delivery against strategic priorities
Enforcement Policy. In an effort to ensure any claims or disputes by exhibitors at the Event (or in the time period prior to the Event) are handled in a non-disruptive manner, the Association hereby agrees to provide all exhibitors
a. That Association is not responsible or liable for any claimed or recognized violations of the Exhibitor’s intellectual property or proprietary rights, including any claims for trademark, copyright or patent infringement or any claims of counterfeiting or other violations of proprietary rights.
b. That the Exhibitor will abide by any and all intellectual property laws, rules or guidelines, including the Rules, whether imposed by national or local laws or by the Association as part of its ownership and/or management of the Event.
c. That the IP Mediator and the Association have no obligation to enforce or act on the behalf of the Exhibitor and that both IP Mediator and Association may, in their sole discretion, determine whether to issue Sanctions or take any action in any case, depending on the facts presented by the Complaining Exhibitor. Nothing herein obligates IP Mediator or Association to take any action or issue any Sanctions.
d. Not to display Exhibitor Content that violates or potentially violates the intellectual property or proprietary rights of another exhibitor at the Event or that is otherwise disruptive to another exhibitor. Exhibitor hereby further agrees that the Association and/or its IP Mediator may determine—in their sole and complete discretion— whether to issue the Sanctions described herein.
e. To comply with any Sanctions issued by IP Mediator and/or the Association. Exhibitor further understands that its refusal to comply with any issued Sanctions may result in further action by Association, which may include the issuance of additional Sanctions or another action as determined by Association in its sole discretion.
f. That a failure by Exhibitor to abide by any Sanctions imposed by IP Mediator and/or the Association may lead to additional Sanctions imposed by Association.
g. That any claim of infringement made to IP Mediator or the Association shall be made with the good faith intent to enforce owned or licensed intellectual property or proprietary rights, and not solely in an effort to disrupt or impact another party’s ability to operate.
h. EXHIBITOR AGREES TO RELEASE AND HOLD HARMLESS THE ASSOCIATION, IP MEDIATOR,AND THEIR AGENTS, CONTRACTORS, AND SERVICE PROVIDERS, (COLLECTIVELY, THE “RELEASED PARTIES”) FOR ANY CLAIMS,...
Enforcement Policy. Bridgend County Borough Council has signed up to the Enforcement Concordat. The principles contained in the Concordat and the code of practice for the Crown Prosecution Service were combined to produce the Public Protection Department’s Overarching Enforcement Policy. The policy was subject to consultation with the public, business and Members before being formally adopted by the Council. Under the umbrella of the Overarching Enforcement Policy there is a specific Food Safety Enforcement Policy which was formally adopted by Council in 2004. A review has recently been completed and is to go out for consultation during the forthcoming year.
Enforcement Policy. The Official Agency and the Authority agree to exchange enforcement policies and to consult with the other party where there are proposals to amend or change either of their enforcement policies.
Enforcement Policy. Cheltenham Borough Council has adopted and published a corporate enforcement policy, based on the Enforcement Concordat, which will form the basis of all enforcement action undertaken by the Food Service.
Enforcement Policy. Statutory penalties, forfeitures, or debts established as an aid to enforce- ment and to compel compliance may be compromised if not prohibited by law and consistent with the agency’s en- forcement policy.
Enforcement Policy. Forest Heath District Council and St. Edmundsbury Borough Council currently have separate written Enforcement Policies. Work is underway to produce a Joint West Suffolk Council’s Enforcement Policy, providing a framework for all of the regulatory services delivered by the Councils, including the food safety service. The policy will reflect recent changes brought about by the Regulators Code which establishes how non-economic regulators should interact with those they are regulating. The new Code requires regulators to: • Carry out their activities in a transparent way that helps those they regulate to comply and grow; • Design simple and straightforward ways to engage with and hear the views of those they regulate; • Base their regulatory activities on risk and share information about compliance and risk; and • Ensure clear information, guidance and advice is available to help those they regulate meet their responsibilities. Officers, including those with responsibility for the enforcement of food and health and safety laws, must have regard to the Enforcement Policy when making enforcement decisions.
