Identification of motorcycle accidents Sample Clauses

Identification of motorcycle accidents. Accidentology results extracted from national databases and in–depth databases, for a 2-year period, from 2006 to 2007, have been used to identify the most frequent fatal motorcycle accident scenarios in Finland, France, Greece, Italy and United Kingdom. Even if other, less critical, accident types are important, mainly fatal accidents have been analysed within WP1, because this was the only way to get data which could be compared among the different countries. This decision to focus on fatal crashes is retained, as the data is the same as that used in WP1. Macro analysis level (national data) Motorcycle accidents data The analysis of national databases in the five countries studied in 2BESAFE project (Finland, France, Greece, Italy and the United Kingdom) shows that: • 68% to 96% of PTW (mopeds and motorcycles) accidents are motorcycle accidents; PTW fatal accidents • 68% to 96% of PTW fatal accidents are motorcycle fatal accidents. PTW fatal accidents Accidents Fatalities Finland 74 75 France 2221 2292 Greece 912 954 Italy 2768 2891 The United Kingdom 1154 1187 Total 7129 7399 Motorcycle fatal accidents Accidents Fatalities Finland 50 (68%) 51 (68%) France 1564 (70%) 1625 (71%) Greece 816 (89%) 853 (89%) Italy 2117 (76%) 2212 (77%) The United Kingdom 1109 (96%) 1141 (96%) Total 5656 (79%) 5882 (79%) Motorcycle fatal accidents Table 4.1. PTW fatal accidents and motorcycle fatal accidents (2006,2007) These data confirm the focus on motorcycles, instead of mopeds. Motorcycle accident configurations and scenarios The accident configurations were selected according to the type(s) of other vehicles involved in the accident, the number of vehicles (including pedestrians) involved in the accident, location of the accident (outside or inside urban area) and road layout configuration (whether accidents happen at a junction ).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Identification of motorcycle accidents

  • Identification Cards Identification (“ID”) cards are issued by Us for identification purposes only. Possession of any ID card confers no right to services or benefits under this Contract. To be entitled to such services or benefits, Your Premiums must be paid in full at the time that the services are sought to be received.

  • Verification of Origin 1. For the purposes of determining whether a good imported into a Party from the other Party qualifies as an originating good, the customs administration of the importing Party may conduct a verification action by means of:

  • Certification of Origin Article 39

  • Non-discrimination Based on National Origin as evidenced by Limited English Proficiency The Contractor agrees to comply with the non-discrimination requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC Section 2000d, et seq., and with the federal guidelines promulgated pursuant to Executive Order 13166 of 2000, which require that contractors and subcontractors receiving federal funds must assure that persons with limited English proficiency can meaningfully access services. To the extent the Contractor provides assistance to individuals with limited English proficiency through the use of oral or written translation or interpretive services in compliance with this requirement, such individuals cannot be required to pay for such services.

  • Identification Badges Identification badges will be supplied by Advanced Behavioral Health (ABH) to all credentialed individuals who are providing services to children. Badges must be presented to the child/youth and any present adults at the time of service and must be worn for the duration of the service. Badges will be updated every two years during the re- credentialing process. Any individual or agency who fails to submit a photo ID to ABH within the designated timeframe will have their credentialing status terminated.

  • Identification Card Any cards issued to Members are for identification only.

  • Demographic, Classification and Wage Information XXXXXX agrees to coordinate the accumulation and distribution of demographic, classification and wage data, as specified in the Letter of Understanding dated December 14, 2011, to CUPE on behalf of Boards of Education. The data currently housed in the Employment Data and Analysis Systems (EDAS) will be the source of the requested information.

  • Client identification 9.1. The Company has the right to require the Client to confirm his/her registration information specified when opening a trading account. To do so, the Company may ask the Client at its own discretion and at any time to provide a notarized electronic copy of his/her identification document, bank statement or public utilities xxxx as a proof of residence. In particular cases, the Company may ask the Client to provide a photo of him/her holding his/her ID near his/her face. The detailed client identification requirements are set out in the “AML policies” section on the Company’s official site.

  • Contractor Certification regarding Business with Certain Countries and Organizations Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code], Contractor certifies Contractor is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization. Contractor acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

  • Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.