Identifying and evaluating historic buildings or structures Sample Clauses

Identifying and evaluating historic buildings or structures a. For properties not listed in the NRHP and not exempt under Section II of this Agreement, the qualified professional shall evaluate the properties and make recommendations for National Register eligibility based on the NRHP Criteria for Evaluation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Identifying and evaluating historic buildings or structures. For properties not listed in the NRHP and not exempt under Section II of this Agreement, the qualified professional shall evaluate the properties and make recommendations for NRHP eligibility based on NRHP Criteria for Evaluation. The qualified professional shall submit a recommendation of eligibility to SHPO for concurrence. This must occur prior to any construction activities commencing. SHPO shall provide written comments regarding the concurrence of eligibility recommendations to VHCB within fifteen (15) days following receipt of adequate documentation. For evaluation of properties in potential historic districts, the qualified professional shall consult with SHPO for guidance on what additional information and materials may need to be provided. SHPO shall provide written comments regarding the concurrence of eligibility recommendations to VHCB within fifteen (15) days following receipt of adequate documentation.
Sample 1
Identifying and evaluating historic buildings or structures. For properties not listed in the NRHP and not exempt under Section II of this Agreement, the qualified professional shall evaluate the properties and make recommendations for National Register eligibility based on the NRHP Criteria for Evaluation. The qualified professional and the Recipient shall submit a preliminary determination of eligibility with VDHP for preliminary concurrence, and for final concurrence prior to any construction activities commencing. If VDHP concurs with the qualified professional’s determination of eligibility, and the Recipient agrees, then proceed to Section IV(3). If there is not agreement regarding a determination of eligibility, then proceed to Section IV(5). For evaluation of properties in potential historic districts, the qualified professional shall consult with VDHP for guidance on what additional information and materials the professional may need to provide.
Sample 1
Identifying and evaluating historic buildings or structures. For properties not listed in the NRHP and not exempt under Section II of this Agreement, the qualified professional/approved CEDO employee shall evaluate the properties and make recommendations for National Register eligibility based on the NRHP Criteria for Evaluation. The qualified professional/approved CEDO employee shall submit a recommendation of eligibility to VDHP for concurrence. This must occur prior to any construction activities commencing. If VDHP concurs with the recommendation of eligibility, then proceed to Section IV(3). If there is not agreement regarding a recommendation of eligibility and VDHP does not concur, the procedure for resolution is set forth in Section IV(5). For evaluation of properties in potential historic districts, the qualified professional shall consult with VDHP for guidance on what additional information and materials the professional may need to provide.
Sample 1

Related to Identifying and evaluating historic buildings or structures

  • Foreign-Owned Companies in Connection with Critical Infrastructure If Texas Government Code, Section 2274.0102(a)(1) (relating to prohibition on contracts with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure) is applicable to this Contract, pursuant to Government Code Section 2274.0102, Contractor certifies that neither it nor its parent company, nor any affiliate of Contractor or its parent company, is: (1) majority owned or controlled by citizens or governmental entities of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or any other country designated by the Governor under Government Code Section 2274.0103, or (2) headquartered in any of those countries.

  • BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 1. Repair or retrofit of buildings less than 45 years old.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • HABILITATIVE SERVICES (HABILITATIVE mean healthcare services that help a person keep, learn, or improve skills and functioning for daily living. Examples include therapy for a child who is not walking or talking at the expected age. These services may include physical and occupational therapy, speech therapy and other services performed in a variety of inpatient and/or outpatient settings for people with disabilities. HOSPITAL means a facility: • that provides medical and surgical care for patients who have acute illnesses or injuries; and • is either listed as a hospital by the American Hospital Association (AHA) or accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO).

  • FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY PROJECTS T h i s p r o v i s i o n i s applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts. In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project: 18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows: "Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 1, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as amended and supplemented; Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!