IMPERIAL VALLEY OFFERS Sample Clauses

IMPERIAL VALLEY OFFERS. In the 2009 RPS RFO, PG&E received several proposals for renewable generation proposed to be sited in the Imperial Valley. The PG&E team generally applied the same steps and processes to evaluate these proposals as it did with others. One exception is that the utility did not use its stated preference for projects interconnecting to the grid within PG&E’s service territory to reject or disfavor any Imperial Valley proposals, as it did with some proposals with other proposed points of interconnection. Xxxxxx believes that the inclusion of Imperial Valley proposals on the final short list represents a fair and reasonable selection made by PG&E. The utility did not unfairly exert undue preference based on Imperial Valley location to select any proposal for the final short list, nor did it reject any Imperial Valley proposal that fully met the criteria applied to screen proposals, the same criteria used in other regions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
IMPERIAL VALLEY OFFERS. PG&E received ' for renewable generation either already operating in or proposed to be sited in the Imperial Valley, or 14% of the total number of conforming Offers for bundled RPS-eligible energy. The PG&E team generally applied the same steps and processes to evaluate these Offers as it did with others. As previously described, PG&E’s methodology appears biased in favor of Offers for new projects that interconnect within the Imperial Irrigation District (or other non-CAISO balancing authority areas) over projects interconnecting within the CAISO; the PG&E team did not apply transmission adders to the former proposals. Projects sited in the Imperial Valley comprise ' Overall, the response of the developer community to propose Imperial Valley projects was robust and PG&E’s selection of Imperial Valley Offers was representative of that strong response. Xxxxxx perceives no evidence that PG&E failed in any way to perform outreach to generation developers and owners active in the Imperial Valley or that there was any structural impediment in the RFO process that materially hindered the selection of competitively priced Offers for projects in the Imperial Valley.
IMPERIAL VALLEY OFFERS. PG&E received several Offers for renewable generation proposed to be sited in the Imperial Valley. The PG&E team generally applied the same steps and processes to evaluate these Offers as it did with others. One exception is that the utility did not use its stated preference for projects interconnecting to the grid within PG&E’s service territory to reject or disfavor any Imperial Valley Offers, as it did with some Offers with other proposed points of interconnection that pose greater challenges for delivery to PG&E customers. Xxxxxx believes that the choice of Imperial Valley Offers on the final short list represents a fair and reasonable selection made by PG&E. The utility did not unfairly exert undue preference based on Imperial Valley location to select any Offer on the final short list, nor did it reject any Imperial Valley Offer that fully met the criteria applied to screen Offers, the same criteria used in other regions. More details on the Imperial Valley Offers and their evaluations are provided in the confidential appendix.
IMPERIAL VALLEY OFFERS. The CPUC has stated a public interest in obtaining a robust response to the IOUs’ RPS solicitations from developers in the Imperial Valley, and in the 2009 RPS solicitations required that the utilities hold special Imperial Valley bidders’ conferences. This focus is “in order to provide all reasonable opportunities for optimal use of the Sunrise transmission project.”7 For the 2012 RPS solicitations, the CPUC did not specifically require special Imperial Valley bidders’ conferences (and treated such conferences as optional) but required continued monitoring of the investor-owned utilities’ renewable procurement activities in the Imperial Valley area. PG&E chose not to conduct a special Imperial Valley conference. PG&E received ' Offers for output of Imperial Valley facilities, ' of all proposals for bundled energy delivery. This was the same number of Imperial Valley project proposals received in PG&E’s 2011 RFO, and more as a percent of the total year’s solicitation the total capacity of Offers for Imperial Valley projects, In this , totaled about '' of all capacity offered. The total annual volume of Imperial Valley projects, This representation of Imperial Valley projects seems to be quite robust

Related to IMPERIAL VALLEY OFFERS

  • Subsidiary Public Offering If, after an initial Public Offering of the common equity securities of one of its Subsidiaries, the Company distributes securities of such Subsidiary to its equityholders, then the rights and obligations of the Company pursuant to this Agreement will apply, mutatis mutandis, to such Subsidiary, and the Company will cause such Subsidiary to comply with such Subsidiary’s obligations under this Agreement as if it were the Company hereunder.

  • Portfolio Securities Portfolio securities of the Issuer may be bought or sold by or through Distributors, and Distributors may participate directly or indirectly in brokerage commissions or "spreads" for transactions in portfolio securities of the Issuer.

  • Equity Offering The issuance and sale after the Closing Date by REIT or any of its Subsidiaries of any equity securities of such Person (other than equity securities issued to REIT or any one or more of its Subsidiaries in their respective Subsidiaries).

  • Public Offering of the Offered Shares The Representatives hereby advise the Company that the Underwriters intend to offer for sale to the public, initially on the terms set forth in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Prospectus and the Prospectus, their respective portions of the Offered Shares as soon after this Agreement has been executed as the Representatives, in their sole judgment, have determined is advisable and practicable.

  • International Offerings In the case of an International Offering, you authorize the Manager: (i) to make representations on your behalf as set forth in any Intersyndicate Agreement, and (ii) to purchase or sell for your account pursuant to the Intersyndicate Agreement: (a) Securities, (b) any other securities of the same class and series, or any securities into which the Securities may be converted or for which the Securities may be exchanged or exercised, and (c) any other securities designated in the applicable AAU or applicable Intersyndicate Agreement (the securities referred to in clauses (b) and (c) above being referred to collectively as the “Other Securities”).

  • Valid Offering Assuming the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the Purchaser contained in this Agreement, the offer, sale and issuance of the Securities will be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and will have been registered or qualified (or are exempt from registration and qualification) under the registration, permit or qualification requirements of all applicable state securities laws.

  • Private Offering by the Company Neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf has offered the Notes or any similar securities for sale to, or solicited any offer to buy any of the same from, or otherwise approached or negotiated in respect thereof with, any person other than the Purchasers and not more than five other Institutional Investors, each of which has been offered the Notes at a private sale for investment. Neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf has taken, or will take, any action that would subject the issuance or sale of the Notes to the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act or to the registration requirements of any securities or blue sky laws of any applicable jurisdiction.

  • No Public Offering No "offer of securities to the public," within the meaning of Spanish law, has taken place or will take place in the Spanish territory in connection with the Restricted Stock Units. The Plan, the Agreement (including this Addendum) and any other documents evidencing the grant of the Restricted Stock Units have not, nor will they be registered with the Comisión Nacional del Xxxxxxx de Valores (the Spanish securities regulator) and none of those documents constitute a public offering prospectus.

  • Authorization of the Offered Securities The Offered Securities to be sold by the Company through the Underwriters have been duly and validly authorized by all required corporate action and have been reserved for issuance and sale pursuant to this Agreement and, when so issued and delivered by the Company, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, free and clear of all Liens (as defined in sub-section (r)) imposed by the Company. The Company has sufficient Ordinary Shares for the issuance of the maximum number of Offered Securities issuable pursuant to the Offering as described in the Prospectus.

  • Investment Company; Public Utility Holding Company Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is an "investment company" or a company "controlled" by an "investment company" within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or a "public utility holding company" within the meaning of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!