The Criteria. Criterion 1: It is appropriate for Health Ministers to exercise responsibility for regulating the occupation in question, or does the occupation more appropriately fall within the domain of another Ministry? Criterion 2: Do the activities of the occupation pose a significant risk of harm to the health and safety of the public? The following should be considered when assessing whether there is significant risk of harm to the health and safety of the public: • the nature and severity of the risk to the client group; • the nature and severity of the risk to the wider public; and • the nature and severity of the risk to the practitioner. Areas which could be explored to identify a risk to public health and safety are: • to what extent does the practice of the occupation involve the use of equipment, materials or processes which could cause a serious threat to public health and safety; • to what extent may the failure of a practitioner to practice in particular ways (that is, follow certain procedures, observe certain standards, or attend to certain matters), result in a serious threat to public health and safety; • are intrusive techniques used in the practice of the occupation, which can cause a serious, or life threatening danger; • to what extent are certain substances used in the practice of the occupation, with particular emphasis on pharmacological compounds, dangerous chemicals or radioactive substances; and • is there significant potential for practitioners to cause damage to the environment or to cause substantial public health and safety risk. Epidemiological or other data, (for example, coroners’ cases, trend analysis, complaints), will be the basis for determining the demonstration of risk/harm.
The Criteria. Pursuant to the Programme Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Originator will sell to the Issuer and the Issuer will purchase from the Originator all the Receivables arising from Loan Agreements which meet, as at the relevant Valuation Date, the following Common Criteria: Common Criteria
The Criteria. 11.9.2.1. Part-time instructors meeting the necessary requirements specified in the job announcement.
The Criteria. (1) The consultant/person has a contract to work for the beneficiary and (some of) that work involves tasks to be carried out under the IEE grant agreement
The Criteria. The first step to use MCDA algorithms is to define some criteria for each policy available in the Decision Module. For each policy, at least three criteria were defined: • cost: o The cost related to the execution of the job. o The cost of 1 second during the job execution (cost/execution time). o Mean confidence associated to the predictions of jobs cost and execution time. • time: o The time the job spent on the system: time in queue + execution time = time to result. o The job slowdown which is the ratio between time to result and execution time. o Mean confidence associated to the predictions of jobs time to result and execution time. • energy: o The energy consumed by the job during its execution. The HEROES project has received funding from the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 956874. The JU receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and France, Spain, Italy. o The energy consumed per second during job execution (energy/execution time). o Mean confidence associated to the predictions of jobs energy consumption and execution time. • performance: o The cost related to the execution of the job. o The time the job spent on the system. o The energy consumed by the job during its execution. o Mean confidence associated to the predictions of jobs cost, time to result and energy consumption. For all policies, the objectives are to minimize all criteria, except for the mean confidence that must be maximised. Each criterion is associated with a weight representing its relative importance. All criteria were set with the same weight, except for the mean confidence that wat associated with half of a weight.
