Public Interest. It is in the public interest that the Executive Director issue orders under section 161 of the Act.
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this Amendment.
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the agreement on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the agreement is consistent with the public interest. In previous dockets, Staff took the position that negotiated agreements should be considered economically efficient if the services are priced at or above their Long Run Service Incremental Costs (“LRSICs”). Requiring that a service be priced at or above its LRSIC ensures that the service is not being subsidized and complies with the Commission’s pricing policy. All of the services in this agreement are priced at or above their respective LRSICs. Therefore, this agreement should not be considered economically inefficient. Nothing in this agreement leads me to the conclusion that the agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this agreement.
Public Interest. Xxxxxx acted contrary to the public interest by engaging in the conduct set out above.
Public Interest. Lessor is obligated to act in the public interest and must operate the Airport and offer access to all users in a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory manner. Therefore, in executing this Agreement and its provisions and in any future amendments, or changes to it, Lessor is and will in the future act with the intent to carry out this provision.
Public Interest. The Project is in public interest.
Public Interest. 3.7.1 If consent to share information has not been given, a professional must consider whether there is a pressing need to disclose the information. The rule of proportionality should be applied to ensure a fair balance is achieved between the public interests in safeguarding the Adult at Risk, the provision of confidential services, and the private rights and interests of the individual affected. The same overall test is applied whether the data subject is the Adult at Risk, the suspected perpetrator of abuse or a third party.
3.7.2 Signatories understand that when considering whether disclosing the information would be in the public interest, the following criteria will be of particular relevance:
3.7.3 When considering whether disclosure is in the public interest, the rights and interests of the individual affected by disclosure must be taken into account. Signatories should consider:
3.7.4 The more sensitive the information, the greater the need to justify disclosure and the greater the need to ensure that only those professionals who have to be informed receive the information.
3.7.5 NHS bodies will also have to consider the Department of Health Code of Practice on Confidentiality, as well as the General Medical Council Guidance, in respect of patient data they hold.
3.7.6 If information is disclosed without consent, it is essential that there is a clear record of the reasons and justification for disclosure so as to demonstrate that the decision is reasonable, proportionate and justifiable.
3.7.7 The Care Act 2014 statutory guidance advises that the first priority should always be to ensure the safety and well-being of the adult.
Public Interest. The disclosure passes the first test only if it furthers the specific public interest of being likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of government operations or activities, regardless of any other public interest it may fur- ther. In analyzing this question, we will consider the following factors:
(1) How, if at all, do the records to be disclosed pertain to the operations or activities of the Federal Government?
(2) Would disclosure of the records re- veal any meaningful information about government operations or activities? Can one learn from these records any- thing about such operations that is not already public knowledge?
(3) Will the disclosure advance the understanding of the general public as distinguished from a narrow segment of interested persons? Under this factor we may consider whether the requester is in a position to contribute to public understanding. For example, we may consider whether the requester has such knowledge or expertise as may be necessary to understand the informa- tion, and whether the requester’s in- tended use of the information would be likely to disseminate the information among the public. An unsupported claim to be doing research for a book or article does not demonstrate that likelihood, while such a claim by a rep- resentative of the news media is better evidence.
(4) Will the contribution to public un- derstanding be a significant one? Will the public’s understanding of the gov- ernment’s operations be substantially greater as a result of the disclosure?
Public Interest. The second issue that must be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the agreement on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission
Public Interest. In light of all of the circumstances, including the undertaking provided by Xxxxx in paragraph 10 of this Agreement, it is not in the public interest for the Executive Director to issue orders under section 161 of the Act against Xxxxx.
