In Egypt – Steel Rebar Sample Clauses

In Egypt – Steel Rebar the Panel confirmed the role of Article 3.1 and explained the relationship between paragraph 5 and paragraphs 2 and 4:

In Egypt – Steel Rebar. Turkey had argued that for a price undercutting analysis to be based on positive evidence as required by Article 3.1, an investigating authority must justify its choice of the basis for the price comparison it makes. The Panel considered that it did not need to opine on the exact nature of the "positive evidence" requirement of Article 3.2 (see para. 134 below below) and dismissed Turkey's claim. The Panel found that Turkey had not established that an objective and unbiased investigating authority could not have found price undercutting on the basis of the evidence of record.35

In Egypt – Steel Rebar the Panel considered whether the mere presentation of tables of data, without more, constituted an "evaluation" in the sense of Article 3.

In Egypt – Steel Rebar the Panel confirmed the role of Article 3.1 and explained the relationship between paragraph 5 and paragraphs 2 and 4: "It is clear that Article 3.1 provides overarching general guidance as to the nature of the injury investigation and analysis that must be conducted by an investigating