Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. In making any Standard of Conduct Determination, the person or persons making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification, and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption and establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled. Any Standard of Conduct Determination that is adverse to Indemnitee may be challenged by the Indemnitee in the Delaware Court. No determination by the Company (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or reimbursement or advance payment of Expenses by the Company hereunder or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. Indemnitee shall be entitled to the presumption that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification provided that, if applicable, the notification provisions of Section 8(a) have been satisfied, and the Company shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that Indemnitee has not satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is not entitled to indemnification. No determination by the Company (including by its Disinterested Directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or reimbursement or advance payment of Expenses by the Company hereunder or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct. The termination of any Claim by judgment, settlement (whether with or without court approval), conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, will not create a presumption that Indemnitee did not meet any applicable standard of conduct or have any particular belief, or that indemnification hereunder is otherwise not permitted.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. Any Standard of Conduct Determination that is adverse to Indemnitee may be challenged by the Indemnitee in the Delaware Court. No determination by the Company (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or reimbursement or advance payment of Expenses by the Company hereunder or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. In making any Proper Group Determination with eligibility of Indemnitee under Colorado law to be indemnified and/or receive Expense Advances hereunder, the person or persons making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification and/or Expense Advances, and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption and establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled. Any such Proper Group Determination that is adverse to Indemnitee may be challenged by the Indemnitee in the Court. No determination by the Company (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct for indemnification or Expense Advances may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or Expense Advances by the Company hereunder or to create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. If a determination is made pursuant to Section 9(c) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, or that Indemnitee is not entitled to be reimbursed for expenses for separate legal counsel under Section 9(i)(iv) of this Agreement, then Indemnitee may petition the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware to adjudicate Indemnitee’s entitlement to such indemnification or expense reimbursement due hereunder. IHM shall pay any and all Expenses reasonably incurred by or on behalf of Indemnitee in connection with the investigation and resolution of such issues, and Indemnitee shall be entitled to have such Expenses, including expenses under Section 9(i)(iv) of this Agreement, advanced by IHM in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement. If a determination is made pursuant to Section 9(c) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement or pursuant to Section 9(i)(iv) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is entitled to reimbursement for expenses for separate legal counsel, then IHM shall be bound by such determination, including in any Proceeding. No determination by IHM (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any Proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or reimbursement or advance payment of Expenses (including expenses for separate legal counsel under Section 9(i)(iv) of this Agreement) by IHM hereunder or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met an applicable standard of conduct, if any should apply.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. In making any Standard of Conduct Determination, the Person making such determination will presume that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification, and the Corporation will have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption and establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled. Any Standard of Conduct Determination that is adverse to Indemnitee may be challenged by Indemnitee in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware within one hundred and eighty (180) days following the date on which Indemnitee first has the right to commence such proceeding pursuant to this Section 6(e)(i). No determination by the Corporation (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or Expenses Advances by the Corporation under this Agreement or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. In making any Standard of Conduct Determination, the person or persons making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification, and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption and establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled. Any Standard of Conduct Determination that is adverse to Indemnitee may be challenged by Indemnitee solely and exclusively in the North Carolina Court. The parties stipulate and agree that such dispute shall be designated by agreement of the parties as a “mandatory complex business case” pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 7A-45.4 (as such statute may be amended or superseded from time to time) or, in the alternative, as a discretionary “complex business” case under Rule 2.1 of the North Carolina General Rules of Practice for the Superior and District Courts (as such rule may be amended or superseded from time to time), and both parties hereby irrevocably waive any objection to such dispute being so designated. No determination by the Company (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or reimbursement or advance payment of Expenses by the Company hereunder or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. In making any Standard of Conduct Determination, the person or persons making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification, and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption and establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled. Any Standard of Conduct Determination that is adverse to Indemnitee may be challenged by the Indemnitee in the Multnomah County Circuit Court of the State of Oregon or other court of competent jurisdiction having jurisdiction over Multnomah County, Oregon. No determination by the Company (including by its directors or any Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not satisfied any applicable standard of conduct may be used as a defense to any legal proceedings brought by Indemnitee to secure indemnification or reimbursement or advance payment of Expenses by the Company hereunder or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any applicable standard of conduct or have any particular belief.
Indemnitee’s Entitlement to Indemnification. In making any Standard of Conduct Determination, the person or persons making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct and is entitled to indemnification, and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption and establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled. Neither the failure of the Company (including by its directors or Independent Counsel) to have made a determination prior to the commencement of any action pursuant to this Agreement that indemnification is proper under the circumstances because Indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor an actual determination by the Company (including by its directors or Independent Counsel) that Indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, will be a defense to the action or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct.
