Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint Sample Clauses

Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint. 66.3.2.1.1. Each rate element utilized in completing a call shall be charged for completion of that call. For example, a call terminating from CLEC through the transiting party, and over Sprint facilities through a Sprint Tandem Switch to a Sprint End Office Switch would include charges from Sprint to CLEC for Common Transport to the Tandem Switch, Tandem Switching, Common Transport to the End Office Switch and End Office switching. A call terminating from CLEC though the transiting party, and then over Sprint facilities through a Sprint End Office Switch to a Sprint Remote Switch would include charges from Sprint to CLEC for Common Transport to the End Office Switch (except where the transiting party is collocated in the Sprint End Office), End Office switching, and Common Transport to the Remote Switch. 66.3.2.2. Indirect Traffic Terminating to CLEC:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (31)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint. Each rate element utilized in completing a call shall be charged for completion of that call. Rate elements charged to Carrier for terminating Indirect Traffic can include (1) End Office Switching as set forth in Attachment I and (2) Common Transport charges set forth in Attachment I.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint. 57.3.2.1.1. Each rate element utilized in completing a call shall be charged for completion of that call. For example, a call terminating from CLEC through the transiting party, and over Sprint facilities to a Sprint End Office Switch would include charges from Sprint to CLEC for Common Transport to the End Office Switch and End Office switching. A call terminating from CLEC though the transiting party, and then over Sprint facilities through a Sprint End Office Switch to a Sprint Remote Switch would include charges from Sprint to CLEC for Common Transport to the End Office Switch (except where the transiting party is collocated in the Sprint End Office), End Office switching, and Common Transport to the Remote Switch.
Sample 1
Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint. 67.3.2.1.1 Each rate element utilized in completing a call shall be charged for completion of that call. For example, a call terminating from Carrier through the transiting party, and the over Sprint facilities through a Sprint Tandem Switch to a Sprint End Office Switch would include charges from Sprint to Carrier for Common Transport to the Tandem Switch, Tandem Switching, Common Transport to the End Office Switch and End Office switching. A call terminating from Carrier though the transiting party, and then over Sprint facilities through a Sprint End Office Switch to a Sprint Remote Switch would include charges from
Sample 1
Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint. Rate elements that may be charged to Carrier are (1) End Office Switching as set forth in Attachment I, and (2) any applicable Common Transport charges set forth in Attachment I except where the transiting LEC and Sprint End Office are collocated.
Sample 1

Related to Indirect Traffic Terminating to Sprint

  • Termination Damages If the Term of this Lease is terminated for default, unless and until Landlord elects lump sum liquidated damages described in the next paragraph, Tenant covenants, as an additional, cumulative obligation after any such termination, to pay punctually to Landlord all the sums and perform all of its obligations in the same manner as if the Term had not been terminated. In calculating such amounts Tenant will be credited with the net proceeds of any rent then actually received by Landlord from a reletting of the Premises after deducting all Rent that has not then been paid by Tenant, provided that Tenant shall never be entitled to receive any portion of the re-letting proceeds, even if the same exceed the Rent originally due hereunder.

  • MUTUAL EXCLUSION OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES Except for any liquidated damages agreed to by the parties to this Agreement related to an unexcused termination of this Agreement, under no circumstances will either party be liable to the other party for special or punitive damages, or consequential loss or damage, or any loss of profits, goodwill, business opportunity, business, or revenue or anticipated savings, in relation to this Agreement, whether or not the relevant loss was foreseeable, or the party was advised of the possibility of such loss or damage or that such loss was in contemplation of the other party.

  • Liability; Provisions that Survive Termination If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Article VII, such termination shall be without liability of any party hereto to any other party hereto except as provided in Section 9.02 and for the Company’s obligations in respect of all prior Issuance Notices, and provided further that in any case the provisions of Article VI, Article VIII and Article IX shall survive termination of this Agreement without limitation.

  • Effectiveness; Continuing Nature of this Agreement; Severability This Agreement shall become effective when executed and delivered by the parties hereto. This is a continuing agreement of Lien subordination (as opposed to an agreement of debt or claim subordination), and the ABL Claimholders and Note Claimholders may continue, at any time and without notice to the other Agent, to extend credit and other financial accommodations and lend monies to or for the benefit of any Grantor in reliance hereon. Each of the Agents, on behalf the ABL Claimholders or the Note Claimholders, as applicable, hereby irrevocably, absolutely, and unconditionally waives any right any Claimholder may have under applicable law to revoke this Agreement or any of the provisions of this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement shall survive, and shall continue in full force and effect, in any Insolvency or Liquidation Proceeding. Consistent with, but not in limitation of, the preceding sentence, each of the Agents, on behalf of the ABL Claimholders and the Note Claimholders, as applicable, irrevocably acknowledges that this Agreement constitutes a “subordination agreement” within the meaning of both New York law and Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. Any provision of this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. All references to any Grantor shall include such Grantor as debtor and debtor-in-possession and any receiver or trustee for any Grantor (as applicable) in any Insolvency or Liquidation Proceeding. This Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force and effect:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!