Inter-Lakes Professional. Employee Evaluation Plan Created by: The Professional Employee Evaluation Committee: Xxxxxxxx Xxxx – Curriculum Coordinator Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx – Elementary School Principal Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx – High School Principal Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx – School Board Chair Xxxxx Xxxxxx – School Board Member Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx – Professional Employee Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx - Professional Employee Xxxxxx Xxxxx - Professional Employee Xxxx Xxxxxxx - Professional Employee Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx – Professional Employee In accordance with Section 22.1.1 (2012-2015 Professional Agreement), a committee was created in the Fall of 2012. The committee, which was comprised of school board members, administrators and professional employees, was charged with reviewing the current evaluation tool and making recommendations for improvement. In addition, the committee addressed the federal and state mandate that at least twenty percent (20%) of a professional employee’s evaluation be based on student performance data. The committee worked through the Fall of 2014, and the decisions of the committee are as follows: The evaluation program is to be used to assist professional employees in the performance of their duties and as a means of guiding and counseling for continued improvement in the educational standards of the school district and maintenance of competent professional employees. The preparation of annual evaluations is the responsibility of the supervising principals and/or other appropriate administrators using the Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument (Xxxxxxxxx, 2007, 2013 eds.). The administrator will use the appropriate Professional Employee Evaluation Rubric (PEER) based on the professional employee’s position in the district. See Appendix E. An evaluation will represent a numeric composite score of the professional employee’s total job performances, including observation by administration, student performance data and performance of daily job-related responsibilities since the last evaluation. A professional employee will be evaluated using five domains. The following correlation between numeric scores and levels will be used: Unsatisfactory = 1 Basic = 2 Proficient = 3 Distinguished = 4 The first four domains, which will account for eighty percent (80%) of the professional employee’s total score, will come directly from Xxxxxxxxx’x Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument. A professional employee will receive a numeric score of one through four (1-4) on each of these domains. The fifth do...
