Common use of Interim Evaluation Clause in Contracts

Interim Evaluation. 1. If the Commission considers as appropriate, in the third year following the year of adoption of the first Decision of the conferral of management of aid of the IPARD Programme, the on-going evaluation shall take the form of a separate interim evaluation. 2. The interim evaluation shall propose measures to improve the quality of the IPARD Programme and its implementation. In particular the [Candidate Country] shall ensure that the interim evaluation examines the initial results of the IPARD Programme, their consistency with the ex-ante appraisal, the relevance of the targets and objectives and the extent to which they have been attained. It shall also assess the quality of Programme monitoring and implementation and the experience gained in setting up the system for implementation of the IPARD Programme. 3. The interim evaluation shall be submitted to the IPARD Monitoring Committee, and to the Commission by 31 December of the year referred to in the paragraph 1 of this Article. 4. In addition to the assessment referred to in Article 63(8), the IPARD Monitoring Committee, the Managing Authority and the Commission shall consider the implications of the evaluation with a view to reviewing the IPARD Programme. 5. The Managing Authority shall inform the Commission about the follow-up to the recommendations in the evaluation report. 6. If the [Candidate Country] fails to submit the interim evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph 3 the provisions of Article 39(4) shall apply.

Interim Evaluation. (1. ) If the Commission considers as appropriate, in the third year following the year of adoption of the first Decision entrustment of the conferral of management of aid of budget implementation tasks for the IPARD ProgrammeII programme, the on-going an interim evaluation shall take the form of a separate interim evaluationbe performed. (2. ) The interim evaluation shall propose measures to improve the quality of the IPARD Programme II programme and its implementation, where appropriate. In particular the [Candidate Country] former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia shall ensure that the interim evaluation examines the initial results of the IPARD ProgrammeII programme, their consistency with the ex-ante appraisal, the relevance of the targets and objectives and the extent to which they have been attained. It shall also assess the quality of Programme monitoring and implementation and the experience gained in setting up the system for implementation of the IPARD ProgrammeII programme. (3. ) The interim evaluation shall be submitted to the IPARD Monitoring CommitteeII monitoring committee, and to the Commission by 31 December of the year referred to in the paragraph 1 of this Article(1). (4. ) In addition to the assessment referred to in Article 63(854(7), the IPARD Monitoring CommitteeII monitoring committee, the Managing Authority and the Commission shall consider the implications of the evaluation with a view to reviewing the IPARD ProgrammeII programme. (5. ) The Managing Authority shall inform the Commission about the follow-up to the recommendations in the evaluation report. 6. If the [Candidate Country] former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia fails to submit the interim evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph 3 the provisions of (3), Article 39(437(5) shall apply.

Interim Evaluation. (1. ) If the Commission considers as appropriate, in the third year following the year of adoption of the first Decision entrustment of the conferral of management of aid of budget implementation tasks for the IPARD ProgrammeII programme, the on-going an interim evaluation shall take the form of a separate interim evaluationbe performed. (2. ) The interim evaluation shall propose measures to improve the quality of the IPARD Programme II programme and its implementation, where appropriate. In particular the [Candidate CountryIPA II beneficiary] shall ensure that the interim evaluation examines the initial results of the IPARD ProgrammeII programme, their consistency with the ex-ante appraisal, the relevance of the targets and objectives and the extent to which they have been attained. It shall also assess the quality of Programme monitoring and implementation and the experience gained in setting up the system for implementation of the IPARD ProgrammeII programme. (3. ) The interim evaluation shall be submitted to the IPARD Monitoring CommitteeII monitoring committee, and to the Commission by 31 December of the year referred to in the paragraph 1 of this Article(1). (4. ) In addition to the assessment referred to in Article 63(854(7), the IPARD Monitoring CommitteeII monitoring committee, the Managing Authority and the Commission shall consider the implications of the evaluation with a view to reviewing the IPARD ProgrammeII programme. (5. ) The Managing Authority shall inform the Commission about the follow-up to the recommendations in the evaluation report. 6. If the [Candidate CountryIPA II beneficiary] fails to submit the interim evaluation report by the date referred to in paragraph 3 the provisions of (3). Article 39(437(5) shall apply.