Common use of INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL Clause in Contracts

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 2006, the IRP consisted of 20 members: the 14 participating member governments, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 2006: Meeting Venue Dates 41 Busan, Korea June 20 42 Del Mar, California, USA October 25 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTC’s website. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.iattc.org

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During After each fishing trip, trip the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 2006, the IRP consisted of 20 members: the 14 participating member governments, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 20062002: Meeting Venue Dates 41 Busan29 La Jolla, Korea California January 31-February 2 30 Manzanillo, Mexico June 19-20 42 Del Mar31 La Jolla, California, USA California October 25 8-9 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTC’s websitewebsite (xxx.xxxxx.xxx). Tables 8-9 The IRP also publishes an annual report, presented to the Meeting of the Parties, which summarizes the activities, actions and Appendix A decisions of this report summarize the Panel and lists the possible infractions identified by for the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governmentsvarious national fleets.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Agreement

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During After each fishing trip, trip the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 20062003, the IRP consisted of 20 21 members: the 14 15 participating member governmentsgovernments that have accepted the Agreement, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 20062003: Meeting Venue Dates 41 Busan32 La Jolla, Korea California February 6-7 33 Antigua, Guatemala June 20 42 18 34 Del Mar, California, USA California October 25 8-9 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTC’s website. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Agreement

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During After each fishing trip, trip the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 20062004, the IRP consisted of 20 21 members: the 14 15 participating member governmentsgovernments that have accepted the Agreement, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. industry.‌ The IRP held the following meetings during 20062004: Meeting Venue Dates 41 Busan35 La Jolla, Korea California February 19 36 Lima, Peru June 20 42 Del Mar8 37 La Jolla, California, USA California October 25 19 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTC’s website. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: iattc.org

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 20062005, the IRP consisted of 20 21 members: the 14 15 participating member governmentsgovernments that have accepted the Agreement, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 20062005: Meeting Venue Dates 41 Busan38 La Jolla, Korea California February 16 39 Lanzarote, Spain June 20 42 Del Mar14 40 La Jolla, California, USA California October 25 19 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTCHTUIATTC’s websitewebsiteUTH. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.iattc.org

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.