JMS’s Responsive Motions to Dismiss Sample Clauses

JMS’s Responsive Motions to Dismiss. Instead of answering the Class Action Complaint, on August 19, 2022, JMS moved to dismiss certain claims in the Action. Specifically, JMS moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim as to Plaintiff Xxxxxx Transport, LLC (Xxxxxx), and the remaining claims (fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and demand for an accounting) as to all Plaintiffs. XXX asserted that Xxxxxx’x Carrier Broker Agreement did not support his claim for breach of contract. JMS also averred that Plaintiffs’ claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment were premised exclusively on allegations of fraudulent conduct and, therefore must, but did not, comply with the heightened pleading requirement of Rule 9(b). JMS further argued that Plaintiffs’ demand for an accounting, a remedy, did not state a cause of action. After Plaintiffs filed the FAC on September 9, 2022, JMS’s motion to dismiss the initial Complaint was rendered moot. As a result, on October 3, 2022, JMS filed a second partial motion to dismiss certain of the claims asserted in the FAC. In this motion, JMS re-asserted that Xxxxxx’x breach of contract claim should be dismissed, and that Plaintiffs’ claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and demand for accounting should be dismissed in their entirety. In addition, JMS asserted that Plaintiffs’ Federal Leasing Regulations claims, except for 49 C.F.R. § 376.12(k), should be dismissed as to the owner-operator plaintiffs; and the Federal Leasing Regulations claim brought under the broker regulations, 49 C.F.R. §§ 371.1 et seq., should be dismissed as to all Plaintiffs. In general, XXX has denied the allegations in the FAC and denied that Plaintiffs were entitled to any relief.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to JMS’s Responsive Motions to Dismiss

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • THE COURT’S FINAL APPROVAL HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • Notice of Legal Actions The Contractor must notify the Department of any legal actions filed against it for a violation of any laws, rules, codes, ordinances or licensing requirements within 30 days of the action being filed. The Contractor must notify the Department of any legal actions filed against it for a breach of a contract of similar size and scope to this Contract within 30 days of the action being filed. Failure to notify the Department of a legal action within 30 days of the action will be grounds for termination for cause of the Contract.

  • Waiver of Appellate and Post-Conviction Rights a. The defendant acknowledges, understands and agrees that by pleading guilty pursuant to this plea agreement he waives his right to appeal or collaterally attack a finding of guilt following the acceptance of this plea agreement, except on grounds of (1) ineffective assistance of counsel; or (2) prosecutorial misconduct.

  • Request for Hearing The employee must file a written request for hearing within fifteen calendar days of receipt of the Notice of Dismissal or Suspension. Filing means receipt in the office designated no later than regular close of business on the last day of the filing period. Failure to file such request in a timely manner shall be deemed a waiver of the right to a hearing and the proposed action shall be effective upon action by the Governing Board without notice or hearing except as may be required in a board meeting agenda.

  • Objections to Settlement 7.7.1 Only Participating Class Members may object to the class action components of the Settlement and/or this Agreement, including contesting the fairness of the Settlement, and/or amounts requested for the Class Counsel Fees Payment, Class Counsel Litigation Expenses Payment and/or Class Representative Service Payment.

  • Release Time for Negotiations CSEA shall have the right to designate a maximum of six (6) employees, who shall be given reasonable release time to participate in negotiations.

  • Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement The PI agrees that information about themselves and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the PI’s name and Requester, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-Technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of controlled-access datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the dbGaP website.

  • Time Limits to Submit to Arbitration Failing satisfactory settlement at Step 2, and pursuant to Article 9, the President or his/her designate, may inform the Employer of his/her intention to submit the dispute to arbitration within:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.