Key Informant Interviews Sample Clauses

The Key Informant Interviews clause establishes the requirement for conducting interviews with individuals who possess specialized knowledge or experience relevant to the subject matter of a project or study. Typically, this clause outlines the process for identifying, selecting, and interviewing these key informants, as well as the methods for documenting and using the information gathered. Its core practical function is to ensure that valuable insights and firsthand perspectives are systematically collected, thereby enhancing the quality and depth of the research or evaluation.
Key Informant Interviews. The KIs were designed to elicit information on the factors that contributed to success, as well as the challenges and barriers that hindered the implementation of the action plans. E2A interviewed country team members and key stakeholders from the MOH, PAC-FP focal point persons/champions at the target facilities selected by the country team for implementation of the action plan, and NGOs and CAs that participated in the VFCP and who were directly involved in the development and/or implementation of the action plans, irrespective of whether they were working in the same position or had transferred to a different position at the time of the assessment. In addition, telephone and Skype KIs were conducted with six global stakeholders, including USAID, WHO/IBP Secretariat, implementing partners, and CAs (IntraHealth and EngenderHealth), who supported PAC-FP at country level in the four countries, and facilitators of the VFCP from MSH and Jhpiego. Among those not interviewed were country team members who were never involved in implementation of the action plan after the 2008 Saly meeting, or otherwise not available for an interview (Table 2).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Key Informant Interviews. The team conducted interviews with key informants from USAID/Nigeria, USAID/W, USAID implementing partners, the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), SMOHs and LGA officials from Kano, Zamfara and Katsina states, facility staff and community groups and workers. A complete list of persons contacted during the evaluation is in Annex C; question matrices, facility checklists, FGD discussion guides are in Annex D.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Key Informant Interviews. Key informant interviews (▇▇▇▇) were used to better understand the perceptions and roles of the sources of IYCF information identified in the ten-seed analysis and the social mapping activity. KIIs were conducted with (1) PHU nurses, (2) MtMSG facilitators, (3) TBAs, and (4) community leaders (i.e., Imam). Participants self- identified as one of the following: PHU nurse, MTMSG facilitator, TBA, or community leader. Each key informant interview was conducted in a quiet, secluded location to maximize privacy. Several topics were discussed in KIIs, including the following: gender roles, gender equality, sources of IYCF information, MtMSGs, other forms of social support and individual counseling versus support groups. The guide for the KIIs can be found in Appendix C. In total, three KIIs were conducted with PHU nurses and MtMSG facilitators in three chiefdoms over the two districts. Two KIIs were conducted with TBAs in two chiefdoms, both of which were located within Koinadugo. Additionally, a KII was conducted with a community leader, an Imam (religious leader), in a single chiefdom in Tonkolili. A copy of the key informant interview guides used with the various participants can be found in Appendix C.
View Source
Key Informant Interviews. Key informants included village chiefs, pastors, and initiation ceremony counselors and were sampled purposively from areas of high unintended pregnancy occurrence. We used community gate keepers and informal networks, such as health care workers and chiefs to identify the key informants. We recruited three initiation counsellors, identified by the chiefs of the villages. The traditional birth attendant (TBA) was recruited through the Safe Motherhood coordinator. The three pastors and the chiefs were recruited through health extension workers. This sampling procedure provided a diversity of views because the participants came from various rural areas and represented diverse age groups, religious affiliations, and leadership roles.
View Source
Key Informant Interviews. Influential people 3
View Source

Related to Key Informant Interviews

  • Interviews An applicant for a posted position with the Employer who is not on a leave of absence without pay and who has been called for an interview shall suffer no loss of basic earnings to attend. Should an employee require a leave of absence from duties for the interview, their supervisor shall be notified as soon as the requirement to appear for an interview is made known.

  • Interview Period It is agreed that upon commencement of employment new employees will be advised by a representative of the Hospital of the existence of the Union and the conditions surrounding their employment as contained in the herein collective agreement and any rules that may be formulated under its terms. It is also agreed that a representative of the union will be given an opportunity to interview each employee once within the completing month of his/her probationary period for the purpose of ascertaining the wishes of the employee concerning membership in the Union. Such interview may take place on the day of orientation. The Hospital will notify the Union monthly of the names of those employees who are completing their probationary period and on request will arrange a time and place for such interview that time of which shall not exceed 15 minutes. Neither employee shall suffer loss of regular pay as a result of such interview.

  • Interview A new employee will have the opportunity to meet with a representative of the Union in the employ of the Hospital for a period of up to minutes during the employee's orientation period without loss of regular earnings. The purpose of the meeting will be to acquaint the employee with such representative of the Union and the collective agreement. Such meetings may be arranged collectively or individually for employees by the Hospital as part of the orientation program." "No employee shall be required or permitted to make any written or verbal agreement with the Hospital or its which conflicts with the terms of this agreement. No individual employee or group of employees shall undertake to represent the union at meetings with the Hospital without proper authorization from the union."

  • Proprietary Information The Software, any data base and any proprietary data, processes, information and documentation made available to the Fund (other than which are or become part of the public domain or are legally required to be made available to the public) (collectively, the “Information”), are the exclusive and confidential property of Custodian or its suppliers. The Fund shall keep the Information confidential by using the same care and discretion that the Fund uses with respect to its own confidential property and trade secrets, but not less than reasonable care. Upon termination of the Agreement or the Software license granted herein for any reason, the Fund shall return to Custodian any and all copies of the Information which are in its possession or under its control.

  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information in this final rule has been reviewed and, pending receipt and evaluation of public comments, approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned control number 1545-1675. The collection of information in this regulation is in Sec. 1.860E-1(c)(5)(ii). This information is required to enable the IRS to verify that a taxpayer is complying with the conditions of this regulation. The collection of information is mandatory and is required. Otherwise, the taxpayer will not receive the benefit of safe harbor treatment as provided in the regulation. The likely respondents are businesses and other for-profit institutions. Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇, with copies to the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, W:CAR:MP:FP:S, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. Comments on the collection of information should be received by September 17, 2002. Comments are specifically requested concerning: Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Internal Revenue Service, including whether the information will have practical utility; The accuracy of the estimated burden associated with the collection of information (see below); How the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected may be enhanced; How the burden of complying with the collection of information may be minimized, including through the application of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of service to provide information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget. The estimated total annual reporting burden is 470 hours, based on an estimated number of respondents of 470 and an estimated average annual burden hours per respondent of one hour. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.