Sampling Procedure. To reduce M&V cost, all fixtures installed will not be measured, an effective NEMVP recommended sampling method will be used. Lighting fixture types that account for greater than 10% of the total fixtures installed will be measured. Lighting fixtures will be separated to homogenous groups and sampled to achieve ±10% precision with 90% confidence. An initial sample size will be used based on an assumption of 0.5 for coefficient of variance. The average savings calculated will be used as the true savings and the uncertainty calculated will have no effect on true savings.
Sampling Procedure a) Each unit, designated on the attached maps and listed in the Appendix B, will be inspected as a separate unit and shall not be averaged with any other unit for acceptance or payment.
b) Inspection for compliance with Cutting Standards will be made on a series of 1/50-acre plots measured using horizontal distance. A sufficient number of plots will be taken to total at least one percent (1%) of the area in the unit being inspected. Plots will be established on the ground using a grid pattern and recorded on unit map(s) for their approximate location. Plot Centers will be marked on the ground.
c) Inspection for compliance with specifications on proportion of the stand treated, selection of thinned stems, construction of piles, lopping of large material, crop tree selection, spacing, cut vegetation completely severed from xxxxx, live branches on cut trees, height of stumps, slash on crop trees, etc., will be made on the entire unit, and compliance with all specifications must be complete before payment is authorized.
d) If any of the requirements on the Treatment of Slash and Trash are not fulfilled, that unit shall be considered unacceptable, and payment will be withheld until the deficiencies are corrected.
Sampling Procedure. The sampling procedures which shall be adhered to will be provided in the site specific SOP manuals.
Sampling Procedure. The first field visit was performed on April 18, 1989 for the purpose of identifying as many of the B-series wellx xx possible. Wellx xxxt were identified were marked for easy identification during sampling. Wellx xxxing removable caps were sounded. The total depth of the well and the depth to water, when found, were recorded. Wellx xxxtaining standing water were pumped out and observed to determine whether water levels recovered. This pumping was performed to ensure that water present in the well represented groundwater rather than water that had collected in the PVC probe. In each case where water was pumped from a well, the water level rapidly recovered, indicating that the water level represented the actual groundwater level. The status of the existing wellx xxx summarized in Table 2. Once the sampleable B-series wellx xxxe identified, the first phase of soil vapor sampling ensued. The second and third phases of sampling followed the construction of the new vapor wellx. The objective of subsurface landfill gas sampling is to collect samples of soil vapor that are chemically representative of the well air. The soil vapor sample collection device is depicted in Figure 3. The device is designed such that the sample can be collected without passing through the sampling pump. The device utilized teflon tubing which minimizes the potential for interaction with sample constituents or the introduction of contaminants. However, the B-series wellx xxxe constructed with sampling lines of flexible plastic tubing (Tygon) that acted as the small inflow line to the collection device. The sampling device is constructed with a 3-way stopcock that permits the purging of the sampling lines prior to sample collection. Prior to the use of the air sampling device, all materials were washed with a mild detergent and rinsed with distilled water and allowed to air dry for at least 24 hours. The tedlar bags used for sample collection were prepared by Sequoia Analytical Laboratory by flushing them with ultra-high pure-grade nitrogen. Five days had passed between the installation of the new vapor wellx xxx the date of their sampling. The target sample volume for each of the samples was five liters or more, collected over a two to four hour period. The pumping rate ranged from 25 to 50 cc/minute. The amount of air moved through the sampling pump is not the same as the sample volume, since the pump serves in providing a pressure drop in the sampling container rather than in directl...
Sampling Procedure. Soil samples were collected in brass tubes using a hand-driven sampler. A 25-lb sliding weight on the sampler's steel shaft drives the sampler's head into the soil. The sampler's head contains a 2 by 6-inch brass tube that collects the soil. Once filled with soil, the brass tube was removed from the sampler, capped at both ends, and further sealed with elastic tape. An identification number was attached to the brass tube and it was 121 placed in an ice-packed cooler. All brass tubes were pre-washed in soapy water to remove any potential chemicals or oils. The sampler was cleaned between borings to prevent cross contamination. All second phase samples were collected in duplicate and one set was sent to the San Mateo County Health Department. Subsurface soil samples in the refuse fill area collected in the third sampling phase were sampled at five-foot intervals until groundwater was encountered. Five of the ten sample sites allowed a second deeper sample at approximately ten feet below the ground surface. For each of the five locations, the resulting dual-depth samples were later composited into single samples by the analytical laboratory prior to analysis. However, the composited samples were not used for the pesticide analyses due to likely interference from plastic refuse; only samples collected at the first depth were analyzed for pesticides.
Sampling Procedure. The first soil samples were collected on April 27 and 28, 1989 in the vicinity of seven of the B-series wellx. X trowel was used to collect surface soil just under the first few inches of the surface. The samples were immediately placed in jars supplied by Sequoia Analytic Laboratory and transported to the laboratory on the same day. The subsurface samples were collected on June 22 and 23, 1989 and were taken from the mound and panhandle areas. This sampling was performed in conjunction with the construction of the six new vapor wellx, xxve of which were located in the mound and one in the panhandle. A California modified split spoon sampler was used to collect two soil samples from each vapor well: one sample at 1.5 to 2 feet below the surface and one sample at 4.5 to 6 feet below the surface. This sampler collects a 2-inch diameter soil core one foot in length. The cap depth was at least 8 feet at all 6 vapor wellx xxxh that all twelve samples were collected from the cap soil. The samples were immediately transferred to jars, sealed, and transported to the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. 132
Sampling Procedure. Water samples were collected by one of three different methods: submersible pump, teflon bailxx, xxd peristaltic pump. The sampling method selected was determined by pump access to the screened interval and the well's water recharge rate. The submersible pump with a suction side sampler was employed in all but three wellx. Xxstructions in wellx X-0A and S-5 required the use of the bailxx. Xxe slow recharge rate in well K-3 required a bailxx xxx a peristaltic pump to collect samples. Approximately three casing volumes of water were removed from each well prior to sampling. Samples from each well were collected into laboratory-specified containers for the analyses -- 40-ml gxxxx xxxls, 1-liter glass jars, and 1-liter polyethylene containers. Identification labels were attached to the sample containers and the samples were then placed in an ice-packed cooler. The cooler was shipped next-day-delivery to McLaren Environmental Laboratory. Duplicate water samples were collected simultaneously and given to the San Mateo County Health Department. Additionally, approximately ten percent of the samples were also sent to Anametric Analytical Laboratory as a quality assurance measure. All 13 wellx xxxe sampled in July 1989 as a part of phase two sampling except well MW-3, which vas sampled in the third phase sampling conducted in August 1989. Wellx X-0B, UGP-1, and UGP-2 were sampled twice, once in each phase.
Sampling Procedure. (i) For Moisture Determination: Each trimmed truck of approximately 35 (thirty-five) wmt, will be sampled in 5 (five) positions, spread evenly across the surface of the truck, using a manual, twin-bladed posthole digger. Each increment to be taken from the full depth of the concentrate incorporating Concentrate from the full vertical column. The 5 (five) increments to be combined to form a single sub-sample, used to represent the moisture content of the trimmed truck. The sub-sample to be kept in a well closed plastic bag, impervious to moisture and processed as soon as possible. The complete moisture sample would be kept in a sealed cooler and sent to a lab jointly selected by Buyer and Seller at the end of the shift (when liberated by the Warehouse), the lab would then break the seal on the sample bag, quickly mix the sample on a steel table and then take duplicate 1 (one) kilogram samples using the increment method for moisture determination. These samples would be dried at 105 (one hundred and five) degrees Celsius for a minimum of 8 (eight) hours until constant weight is obtained. The average of the 2 (two) results obtained will be reported for moisture content. The moisture thus determined shall be final for settlement purposes.
Sampling Procedure. The procedure and frequency of sampling will be decided jointly. The sample testing for moisture content and/or chemical composition shall be drawn jointly by the representative of the DGM (QA&TD) of the supplier and purchaser’s authorized representative to associate in the sampling and analysis at the Supplier’s premises/Laboratory. The analysis report submitted by the Supplier shall be final and binding on the Purchaser. The supplier undertakes to maintain proper laboratory records of test(s) carried out and issue test certificate to the Purchaser.
Sampling Procedure. Prior to commencing series shipments, initial samples shall be submitted to Xxxxxx in good time for initial sample inspection and approval in the following cases: - In case of new products - In case of a change of sub-supplier - In case of a modification of a product - In case of a change in material - If new tools or modified or new production processes are used These samples must have been manufactured completely using series production equipment under series production conditions and they must have been inspected with regard to all quality criteria. The sample parts shall be submitted including the test results in the form of initial sample inspection reports. These shipments shall be clearly marked as initial samples. The number of initial samples and the content-related and formal requirements for the sampling procedure are either defined with the order or have to be agreed with Xxxxxx. For multi-cavity tooling, samples shall be measured and submitted separately from each cavity. Xxxxxx will generally inspect sample parts, communicate the results to the Supplier in a rest report and approve series shipments if the samples comply with the requirements. Samples released for production shall be confirmed as released by both contractual parties. Both Xxxxxx and the Supplier shall retain one sample identified as released each so that the approved sample can be used as a reference in case of any complaint. The retention period ends on phase-out of the associated production or when the production is changed and a new accepted sample is available. The retention of the test results determined is exclusively governed by the time-limits specified.
