Common use of MEPS Panel 14 Weight Clause in Contracts

MEPS Panel 14 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 14 was developed using the 2009 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2009. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU some time in 2010 after being out-of-scope in 2009, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2009 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control figures for December 2010. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population totals obtained from the March 2011 CPS to correspond to a national estimate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population provided by the Census Bureau for December 2010. Variables used in the establishment of person-level control figures included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, black but non-Hispanic, Asian but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; and age. The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment.

MEPS Panel 14 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 14 was developed using the 2009 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2009. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU some time in 2010 after being out-of-scope in 2009, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2009 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for person-level nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control figures for December 2010 for key, responding persons inscope on December 31, 2010. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population totals distribution obtained from the March 2011 2010 CPS to correspond to a national estimate reflect the December 31, 2010 estimated population total (estimated based on Census projections for the civilian noninstitutionalized population provided by the Census Bureau for December January 1, 2010). Variables used in the establishment of for person-level control figures raking included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-non- MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, black Black but non-Hispanic, Asian but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; and age. The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment.

MEPS Panel 14 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 14 was developed using the 2009 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2009. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU some time sometime in 2010 after being out-of-scope in 2009, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2009 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control figures for December 2010. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population totals obtained from the March 2011 CPS to correspond to a national estimate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population provided by the Census Bureau for December 2010. Variables used in the establishment of person-level control figures included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, black but non-Hispanic, Asian but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; and age. The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight, the weight after the nonresponse adjustment.

MEPS Panel 14 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 14 was developed using the 2009 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2009. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU some time in 2010 after being out-of-scope in 2009, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2009 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control figures for December 2010. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population totals obtained from the March 2011 CPS to correspond to a national estimate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population provided by the Census Bureau for December 2010. Variables used in the establishment of person-level control figures included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, ; black but non-Hispanic, ; Asian but non-Hispanic, ; and other); sex; and age. The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment.

MEPS Panel 14 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 14 was developed using the 2009 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2009. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU some time sometime in 2010 after being out-of-scope in 2009, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2009 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control figures for December 2010. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population totals obtained from the March 2011 CPS to correspond to a national estimate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population provided by the Census Bureau for December 2010. Variables used in the establishment of person-level control figures included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic; black, black but non-Hispanic; Asian, Asian but non-Hispanic, ; and other); sex; and age. The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment.