Mitigating Secured Creditor Risks Sample Clauses

Mitigating Secured Creditor Risks. If either (1) a license is exclusive, or (2) the licensee is not a licensee in the ordinary course of business as described in U.C.C. section 9-321, then prior to execution of the license, the licensee should conduct a search for any perfected security interests in the software. While a complete discussion of search procedures is beyond the scope of this chapter, in general the licensee should search in the central filing office in the state where the licensor is organized or has its chief executive office, using the name of the licensor as determined from its organic documents. If a prior, perfected security interest is found, the customer will need to seek a release from the prior, perfected lien holders. The author has found lenders amenable to this request when the release is narrowly tailored to the specific license agreement at issue. Whether or not a prior security interest is found, the exclusive or non-ordinary-course licensee should consider filing a U.C.C. financ- ing statement against the licensor describing the licensed software and checking the “Licensee/Licensor” box to indicate the nature of the transaction. After the filing of such a financing statement, any subse- quently perfected security interests would clearly not take precedence over the software license agreement. If no such financing statement is filed by the licensee, the licensee would usually prevail anyway over the vendor’s subsequent secured lender on the theory that the vendor ’s rights in the underlying software were encumbered by the license prior to the time the secured lender’s security interest attached. However, in certain cases arguments could be made that the licensee’s right should be recharacterized and treated as merely a security interest, and since that interest would otherwise be unperfected, a filing would be necessary for the licensee to have priority. In some circumstances, it may make sense for a customer to obtain a security interest to secure the obligation of the vendor to perform under the contract.46 If the licensee perfects its security interest and 46. Id. § 9-109. Software License Agreements § 1:14.2 obtains first priority, it will have rights over all other creditors.47 Hence, if the licensee is first to file or perfect its interest and later a different creditor attempts to foreclose on the asset, the junior creditor ’s rights to foreclose will be subject to the licensee’s rights in the collateral. Additionally, because article 9 allows the parties...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Mitigating Secured Creditor Risks

  • Additional Indemnity Provisions A. GRANTEE AND SYSTEM AGENCY AGREE TO FURNISH TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE TO EACH OTHER OF ANY INDEMNITY CLAIM. GRANTEE SHALL BE LIABLE TO PAY ALL COSTS OF DEFENSE, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

  • Indemnity Procedures Promptly after receipt by an Indemnified Party of any claim or notice of the commencement of any action or administrative or legal proceeding or investigation as to which the indemnity provided for in Article 18.1 may apply, the Indemnified Party shall notify the Indemnifying Party of such fact. Any failure of or delay in such notification shall not affect a Party’s indemnification obligation unless such failure or delay is materially prejudicial to the Indemnifying Party. Except as stated below, the Indemnifying Party shall have the right to assume the defense thereof with counsel designated by such Indemnifying Party and reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified Party. If the defendants in any such action include one or more Indemnified Parties and the Indemnifying Party and if the Indemnified Party reasonably concludes that there may be legal defenses available to it and/or other Indemnified Parties which are different from or additional to those available to the Indemnifying Party, the Indemnified Party shall have the right to select separate counsel to assert such legal defenses and to otherwise participate in the defense of such action on its own behalf. In such instances, the Indemnifying Party shall only be required to pay the fees and expenses of one additional attorney to represent an Indemnified Party or Indemnified Parties having such differing or additional legal defenses. The Indemnified Party shall be entitled, at its expense, to participate in any such action, suit or proceeding, the defense of which has been assumed by the Indemnifying Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Indemnifying Party (i) shall not be entitled to assume and control the defense of any such action, suit or proceedings if and to the extent that, in the opinion of the Indemnified Party and its counsel, such action, suit or proceeding involves the potential imposition of criminal liability on the Indemnified Party, or there exists a conflict or adversity of interest between the Indemnified Party and the Indemnifying Party, in such event the Indemnifying Party shall pay the reasonable expenses of the Indemnified Party, and (ii) shall not settle or consent to the entry of any judgment in any action, suit or proceeding without the consent of the Indemnified Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.