Model Settings Sample Clauses

Model Settings. Basic Parameters and Ter- minology To model the non-Markovian stochastic process of respondents’ decision making, we first use the binary random variable Bi to denote the final decision of the ith respondent in the survey with the subscript ”M ” for ”Markovian” and ”NM ” for ”non-Markovian”. Let Bi in both cases satisfy the following:   1 if the respondent decides to buy Bi =  0 if the respondent decides not to buy Then, the result of the survey will form a chain filled with ”1” and ”0”. Assume all respondents’ purchase probabilities in the Markov process at a given price follow an independent identical binary distribution1. Then   1 with probability P0 Bi,M =  0 with probability 1 — P0 1This is also referred to as respondents’ innate purchase probability. By maximum likelihood estimation(see e.g. (30)), we have: P0 = ⟨ N ΣN i=1 Bi,M ⟩ If we examine the definition of P0 more carefully, we’ll find it shares the same meaning as the sample’s final purchase rate. As shown in the last chapter, the final purchase rate in each sample converges, with each value read from data as follow: ,  ,, X0(Xx,X = 1|price = A10) = 0.322 , P0(Bi,M = 1|price = A5) = 0.548 0 i,M , P (B = 1|price = A3) = 0.781 The non-Markovian purchase probability Pi for the ith respondent should also depend on decisions made by previous Nr respondents which form his/her mem- ory. Assume the decision of each respondent in the memory has the same weight 1/Nr; then the overall effect on the last respondent should relates to the purchase percentage ri in the memory; by using previous notations, it can be defined as the following:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Model Settings

  • Goal Setting Each unit member shall participate in an annual goal setting process to establish goals and objectives. The evaluator shall review the Evaluation Criteria in Article 12.2.1 with all unit members who are on the evaluation cycle.

  • Interconnection Points 8.5.1 The IP of a Party (“Receiving Party”) for Measured Internet Traffic delivered to the Receiving Party by the other Party shall be the same as the IP of the Receiving Party for Reciprocal Compensation Traffic under Section 7.1 above.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where InterGlobe has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to InterGlobe. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for InterGlobe (e.g. hairpinning):

  • Commercial Settlement All the commercial settlements under this agreement shall be as per Government of Gujarat’s Solar Power Policy 2015 and Order No. 3 of 2015 dated 17.08.2015 of the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and any subsequent orders in this regard. The commercial settlement will be as follows:

  • Interconnection Point The Service Provider is responsible for connecting to the LFC Network at the Interconnection Point. The LFC may only change an Interconnection Point if a change is necessary to protect the security or integrity of that Interconnection Point in order to maintain the continuity of supply of the Wholesale Services. In the event of any such change:

  • Interconnection Product Options Interconnection Customer has selected the following (checked) type of Interconnection Service:

  • NETWORK INTERCONNECTION METHODS 64.1 This Section sets forth the terms and conditions for Network Interconnection Methods (NIMs) provided between CenturyLink and CLEC for the Interconnection Facilities established between the Parties’ networks. Additionally, this Section describes the physical architecture for the Interconnection of the Parties’ facilities and equipment required for the transmission and routing of Local Traffic, ISP-Bound Traffic, IntraLATA LEC Toll Traffic, VoIP-PSTN Traffic, Transit Traffic and Jointly Provided Switched Access Service Traffic.

  • Points of Interconnection and Trunk Types 2.1 Point(s) of Interconnection.

  • Trunk Types 2.2.1 In interconnecting their networks pursuant to this Attachment, the Parties will use, as appropriate, the following separate and distinct trunk groups:

  • Traffic Measurement and Billing over Interconnection Trunks 6.1 For billing purposes, each Party shall pass Calling Party Number (CPN) information on at least ninety-five percent (95%) of calls carried over the Interconnection Trunks.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.