Common use of Monitoring Grant Performance Clause in Contracts

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENT’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENT’s XXXXX’x performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTWALNUT CREEK’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTMONTEREY’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-desk- based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTSONOMA’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-desk- based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. DRAFT (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTALAMEDA’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-desk- based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTSANTA CRUZ’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-desk- based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTNOVATO’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and

Monitoring Grant Performance. (a) City and the UASI Management Team are both authorized to perform periodic monitoring reviews of SUBRECIPIENTMARIN’s performance under this Agreement, to ensure that the Grant Plan goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestone completion, budgets and other criteria are being met. Programmatic monitoring may include the Regional Federal Preparedness Coordinators, or other federal or state personnel, when appropriate. Monitoring may involve a combination of desk-based reviews and on-site monitoring visits, inspection of records, and verifications of grant activities. These reviews will involve a review and analysis of the financial, programmatic, performance and administrative issues relative to each program and will identify areas where technical assistance and other support may be needed. The reviews may include, but are not limited to: 1. Evaluating eligibility of expenditures; 2. Comparing actual grant activities to those approved by the Approval Authority and specified in the Grant Plan; 3. Ensuring that any advances have been deposited in an interest bearing account and disbursed in accordance with applicable guidelines; and