Common use of MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS Clause in Contracts

MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE). • Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be analyzed, specific goals and objectives should be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns should play an important role in determining goals. • Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. DocuSign Envelope ID: FFA39A92-595D-4553-9F3E-2AE0A3A88CFF Contract No. 24-8IDP5009 PS Contract No. 8450 These MOE should adequately compare multimodal alternatives. They should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of- service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluated. • Development of Alternative Scenarios for the Corridor – The ENGINEER shall, depending on the specific needs and characteristics of the corridor develop and present different scenarios that represent potential multimodal alternatives. The analysis shall include the No-Build scenario as a reference point. Each scenario shall be developed with sufficient engineering and operational detail to allow the travel demand model to simulate the impact of the proposed solutions. • Travel Demand Model (TDM) Forecasts - The ENGINEER shall use the MPO’s travel demand model to test the alternative proposed scenarios. The ENGINEER shall be prepared to execute individual elements of the TDM (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and assignment) or all of them. Data will be extracted, by the ENGINEER, from each model run to prepare the comparison of all scenarios based on the predetermined XXXx. • Deliverables:  Analysis reports  Presentations

MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE). • Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be analyzedlooked at, specific goals and objectives should will be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns should will play an important role in determining goals. • Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (MOEXXXx) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. DocuSign Envelope ID: FFA39A92F09708A9-595D-455372F3-9F3E-2AE0A3A88CFF 4154-AEDE-751E59B5E1DF Contract No. 2436-8IDP5009 PS 6RFP5448 PSoft Contract No. 8450 6318 These MOE should XXXx will adequately compare multimodal alternatives. They Thus, they should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of- of-service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluatedevaluated as well. • Development of Alternative Scenarios for the Corridor – The ENGINEER shall, depending on the specific needs and characteristics of the corridor develop and and, present different scenarios that represent potential multimodal alternatives. The analysis shall include the No-Build scenario as a reference point. Each scenario shall be developed with sufficient engineering and operational detail to allow the travel demand model to simulate the impact of the proposed solutions. • Travel Demand Model (TDM) Forecasts - The ENGINEER shall use the MPO’s travel demand model to test the alternative proposed scenarios. The ENGINEER shall be prepared to execute individual elements of the TDM (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and assignment) or all of them. Data will be extracted, by the ENGINEER, from each model run to prepare the comparison of all scenarios based on the predetermined XXXx. • DeliverablesDeliverables provided by the Engineer:  Analysis reports  Presentations

MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE). • Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be analyzed, specific goals and objectives should be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns should play an important role in determining goals. • Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. DocuSign Envelope ID: FFA39A927C32DB83-595D-455385AE-48EE-9F3E-2AE0A3A88CFF A908-464642C11C85 Contract No. 24-8IDP5009 8IDP5010 PS Contract No. 8450 8448 These MOE should adequately compare multimodal alternatives. They should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of- service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluated. • Development of Alternative Scenarios for the Corridor – The ENGINEER shall, depending on the specific needs and characteristics of the corridor develop and present different scenarios that represent potential multimodal alternatives. The analysis shall include the No-Build scenario as a reference point. Each scenario shall be developed with sufficient engineering and operational detail to allow the travel demand model to simulate the impact of the proposed solutions. • Travel Demand Model (TDM) Forecasts - The ENGINEER shall use the MPO’s travel demand model to test the alternative proposed scenarios. The ENGINEER shall be prepared to execute individual elements of the TDM (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and assignment) or all of them. Data will be extracted, by the ENGINEER, from each model run to prepare the comparison of all scenarios based on the predetermined XXXx. • Deliverables:  Analysis reports  Presentations

MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE). • Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be analyzedlooked at, specific goals and objectives should will be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns should will play an important role in determining goals. • Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (MOEXXXx) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. DocuSign Envelope ID: FFA39A92-595D-4553-9F3E-2AE0A3A88CFF Contract No. 24-8IDP5009 PS Contract No. 8450 These MOE should XXXx will adequately compare multimodal alternatives. They Thus, they should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of- of-service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluatedevaluated as well. • Development of Alternative Scenarios for the Corridor – The ENGINEER shall, depending on the specific needs and characteristics of the corridor develop and and, present different scenarios that represent potential multimodal alternatives. The analysis shall include the No-Build scenario as a reference point. Each scenario shall be developed with sufficient engineering and operational detail to allow the travel demand model to simulate the impact of the proposed solutions. • Travel Demand Model (TDM) Forecasts - The ENGINEER shall use the MPO’s travel demand model to test the alternative proposed scenarios. The ENGINEER shall DocuSign Envelope ID: 72A77E6D-1011-4A73-AFB3-C43B2D5483E3 Contract No. 36-6RFP5450 PSoft Contract 6316 be prepared to execute individual elements of the TDM (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and assignment) or all of them. Data will be extracted, by the ENGINEER, from each model run to prepare the comparison of all scenarios based on the predetermined XXXx. • Deliverables:  ▪ Analysis reports  ▪ Presentations