Ofsted judgement Good, Outstanding or Effective Sample Clauses

Ofsted judgement Good, Outstanding or Effective. 10.4.1 SCC will fund places for children eligible for FEET, the universal entitlement and the working parent entitlement at any Provider judged ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted or at any childminder or childcare Provider registered with a childminder agency judged ‘effective’ by Ofsted if a parent wants their child to take up their funded place at that Provider and the Provider is willing to accept the local authority funding and any other local authority requirements.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ofsted judgement Good, Outstanding or Effective. 10.4.1 SCC will fund places for two, three and four year old children at any provider judged ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted or at any childminder registered with a childminder agency judged ‘effective’ by Ofsted, as long as a parent wants their child to take up their funded place at that provider and the provider is willing to accept SCC’s funding requirements as set out in this agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Ofsted judgement Good, Outstanding or Effective

  • Termination Due To Lack Of Funding Appropriation If, in the judgment of the Director of Accounts and Reports, Department of Administration, sufficient funds are not appropriated to continue the function performed in this agreement and for the payment of the charges hereunder, State may terminate this agreement at the end of its current fiscal year. State agrees to give written notice of termination to contractor at least 30 days prior to the end of its current fiscal year, and shall give such notice for a greater period prior to the end of such fiscal year as may be provided in this contract, except that such notice shall not be required prior to 90 days before the end of such fiscal year. Contractor shall have the right, at the end of such fiscal year, to take possession of any equipment provided State under the contract. State will pay to the contractor all regular contractual payments incurred through the end of such fiscal year, plus contractual charges incidental to the return of any such equipment. Upon termination of the agreement by State, title to any such equipment shall revert to contractor at the end of the State's current fiscal year. The termination of the contract pursuant to this paragraph shall not cause any penalty to be charged to the agency or the contractor.

  • Retainage for Unacceptable Corrective Action Plan or Plan Failure If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department or Customer, or implementation of the plan fails to remedy the performance deficiencies, the Department or Customer will retain ten percent (10%) of the total invoice amount. The retainage will be withheld until the Contractor resolves the performance deficiencies. If the performance deficiencies are resolved, the Contractor may invoice the Department or Customer for the retained amount. If the Contractor fails to resolve the performance deficiencies, the retained amount will be forfeited to compensate the Department or Customer for the performance deficiencies.

  • Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions (a) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!