Invoicing for Charges Against the Judicial Council’s Master Account A. The Contractor shall establish a Master Account for the Judicial Council’s charges provided for under the exhibits of this Agreement.
MAXIMUM COST TO COUNTY In no event will the cost to County for the services to be provided herein exceed the maximum sum of $ including direct non-salary expenses. As set forth in section 14 of this Contract, should the funding source for this Contract be reduced, Contractor agrees that this maximum cost to County may be amended by written notice from County to reflect that reduction.
TERMINATION FOR NON-ADHERENCE OF COUNTY LOBBYIST ORDINANCE The Contractor, and each County Lobbyist or County Lobbying firm as defined in County Code Section 2.160.010 retained by the Contractor, shall fully comply with the County’s Lobbyist Ordinance, County Code Chapter 2.160. Failure on the part of the Contractor or any County Lobbyist or County Lobbying firm retained by the Contractor to fully comply with the County’s Lobbyist Ordinance shall constitute a material breach of this Master Agreement, upon which the County may in its sole discretion, immediately terminate or suspend this Master Agreement.
Program Requirements Provided At No Charge to the Judicial Council A. The Contractor shall provide the following items during the Program at no charge to the Judicial Council:
The City of Milwaukee, by its Milwaukee Board of School Directors, shall pay the Contractor for the full and complete performance of the work, the sum of Two Hundred Forty One Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Dollars and 60/100 ($241,270.60) as provided in the General Conditions of the Contract.
Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States Pursuant to Executive Order 13043, 62 FR 19217 (April 8, 1997), Grantee is encouraged to consider adopting and enforcing on-the-job seat belt policies and programs for their employees when operating company-owned, rented or personally owned vehicles.
Recourse to Agencies or Courts of Competent Jurisdiction Notwithstanding Section 11.2, nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the rights of a Party to file a complaint with the FERC under relevant provisions of the Federal Power Act or with the PUCO under relevant provisions of the Legal Authorities. The Parties’ agreement under this Section 11.3 is without prejudice to any Party’s right to contest jurisdiction of the FERC or PUCO to which a complaint is brought.