Performance Expectation Sample Clauses

Performance Expectation. Provided the conditions are met under 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 preceding, ALLTEL’s performance expectation is to provide traffic flow 100% of the time. If service levels fall below the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (41)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Expectation. Provided the conditions are met under 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 proceeding, Windstream’s performance expectation is to provide 100% due dates met within reporting month. If service levels fall below 95% of the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (32)
Performance Expectation. Zero loss of service due to downtime. If service levels fall below the Performance Expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days. Specific time-frames will be listed relative to performance.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (29)
Performance Expectation. Provided the conditions are met under 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 proceeding, XXXXXX’s performance expectation is to provide 100% due dates met within reporting month. If service levels fall below 95% of the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
Performance Expectation. Provided the conditions are met under 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 preceding, a Party’s performance expectation is to provide traffic flow 100% of the time. If service levels fall below the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days.
Sample 1
Performance Expectation. Provided the conditions are met under 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 preceding, Windstream’s performance expectation is to provide traffic flow 100% of the time. If service levels fall below the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days. SouthEast Telephone, Inc. DATE Page 77 2.3 Trunk Service Restoration
Sample 1
Performance Expectation. Provided the conditions are met under 4.1 and 4.2 proceeding, a Party’s performance expectation is to provide 100% due dates within the reporting month. If service levels fall below 95% of the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days. DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D95C603-9B13-415A-8896-DE487D77824D
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Expectation. Siemens and UBI will conduct quarterly business reviews at a time and date agreed upon by both parties. The purpose of these reviews is to review performance metrics and define projects to propagate continuous improvement of the products and processes covered within this Supply Agreement with long term goals to jointly reduce UBI’s and Siemens’ internal costs during the term. Performance metrics may include: • Third Party supplier performance metrics • Quality of delivered goods • Discrepancies in quantities supplied * Confidential portion has been omitted and has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. • Complaint handling • Corrective and preventive action management and status • Obsolescence management • Changes in materials and processes (made and in progress) • In-field issues Annually, at the business reviews UBI will present to Siemens any process improvement activity undertaken during such year. Siemens will present to UBI marketing achievements, plans and support metrics.
Sample 1
Performance Expectation. Siemens and UBI will conduct quarterly business reviews at a time and date agreed upon by both parties. The purpose of these reviews is to review performance metrics and define projects to propagate continuous improvement of the products and processes covered within this Supply Agreement with long term goals to jointly reduce UBI’s and Siemens’ internal costs during the term. Performance metrics may include: • Third Party supplier performance metrics • Quality of delivered goods • Discrepancies in quantities supplied • Complaint handling • Corrective and preventive action management and status • Obsolescence management • Changes in materials and processes (made and in progress) • In-field issues Annually, at the business reviews UBI will present to Siemens any process improvement activity undertaken during such year. Siemens will present to UBI marketing achievements, plans and support metrics.
Sample 1

Related to Performance Expectation

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Goal The goals of the Department’s grants are to: 1. Reduce delinquency, increase offender accountability, and rehabilitate juvenile offenders through a comprehensive, coordinated, community-based juvenile probation system;

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Performance Standard The Department’s Grant Manager will review the documentation to verify that the deliverables have been completed as described above. Upon review and written acceptance by the Department’s Grant Manager, the Grantee may proceed with payment request submittal. Payment Request Schedule: The Grantee may submit a payment request for cost reimbursement no more frequently than monthly.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!