Common use of Preliminary Matters Clause in Contracts

Preliminary Matters. On November 21, 2000, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Maxcess, Inc., (“Maxcess”) filed a joint request for approval of the first Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement (the “First Amendment”) dated October 23, 2000 between the parties under Sections 252(a)(1) and (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. (“the Act”). The First Amendment was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the request was filed, along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and Xxx Xxxx, on behalf of Maxcess, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 7, 2000. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, a Policy Analyst with the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxx recommended approval of the First Amendment. At the hearing, Staff and Ameritech Illinois indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On November 21March 7, 20002002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and MaxcessCellular Properties, Inc., d/b/a as Cellular One (“MaxcessCellular One”) ), filed a joint request for approval of the first Amendment to an Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated January 11, 2002 (the “First AmendmentAgreement”) dated October 23), 2000 between the parties under Sections 252(a)(1) and (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. (“the Act”). The First Amendment was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the request was filed, were filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxx XxxxxxxXxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and Xxx Xxxxand, Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of MaxcessCellular One, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Hearing Examiner Adminstrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 7March 14, 20002002. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, a Policy Analyst with Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, Division which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxx Xxx recommended the approval of the First AmendmentAgreement. At the hearing, Staff and Ameritech Illinois indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On November 21April 19, 20002001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and MaxcessTelicor, Inc., Inc. (“MaxcessTelicor”) filed a joint request petition for approval of the first Amendment to an Interconnection Negotiated Resale Agreement dated March 1, 2001 (the “First AmendmentAgreement”) dated October 23), 2000 between the parties under Sections 252(a)(1) and (e252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. .) (“the Act”). The First Amendment Agreement was submitted with the requestpetition. A statement in support of the request petition was filed, filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, Illinois and Xxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx on behalf of MaxcessTelicor, stating that the facts contained in the request petition for approval are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 7May 21, 20002001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, a Policy Analyst with Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxx recommended approval of the First Amendment. At the hearinghearing on May 21, Staff and Ameritech Illinois indicated appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, . Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On November June 21, 2000, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and MaxcessNew Edge Network, Inc., Inc. (“MaxcessNew Edge”) ), filed a joint request for approval of the first Amendment to an Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated March 15, 2000 (the “First AmendmentAgreement”) dated October 23), 2000 between the parties under Sections 252(a)(1) and (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. .) (“the Act”). The First Amendment Agreement was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the request was filed, were filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxx XxxxxxxXxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, Illinois and Xxx XxxxXxxxx XxXxxxx, on behalf of MaxcessNew Edge, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 7July 20, 2000. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, a Policy Analyst with A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, Division which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the First AmendmentAgreement. At the hearing, Staff and Ameritech Illinois indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On November 21February 28, 20002001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and MaxcessPae Tec Communications, Inc., Inc. (“MaxcessPae Tec”) filed a joint request petition for approval of the first First Amendment to an the Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated January 19, 2001 (the “First AmendmentAmendment Agreement”) dated October 23), 2000 between the parties under Sections 252(a)(1) and (e252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. .) (“the Act”). The First Amendment Agreement was submitted with the requestpetition. A statement in support of the request petition was filed, filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxx XxxxxxxXxxx Xxxxxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and Xxx XxxxX.X. Xxxxxxx, on behalf of MaxcessPae Tec, stating that the facts contained in the request petition for approval are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 7April 4, 20002001. The Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, a Policy Analyst with A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxx recommended approval of the First Amendment. At the hearing, hearing on Staff and Ameritech Illinois indicated appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, . Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”