Preliminary Examination. 24.1 The Purchaser will examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order. 24.2 Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail, and the total price shall be corrected. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, its bid will be rejected, and its bid security may be forfeited. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the amount in words will prevail. 24.3 The Purchaser may waive any minor informality, nonconformity, or irregularity in a bid which does not constitute a material deviation, provided such waiver does not prejudice or affect the relative ranking of any Bidder. 24.4 Prior to the detailed evaluation, pursuant to ITB Clause 25 the Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each bid to the bidding documents. For purposes of these Clauses, a substantially responsive bid is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the bidding documents without material deviations. Deviations from, or objections or reservations to critical provisions, such as those concerning Bid Security (ITB Clause 15), Applicable Law (GCC Clause 30), and Taxes and Duties (GCC Clause 32), will be deemed to be a material deviation. The Purchaser’s determination of a bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence.
Preliminary Examination i. The Procuring Agency shall examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order.
ii. In the financial bids, if there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the amount in words shall prevail.
iii. The Procuring Agency may waive any minor informality, nonconformity, or irregularity in a bid which does not constitute a material deviation, provided such waiver does not prejudice or affect the relative ranking of any bidder.
iv. Prior to the detailed evaluation, the Procuring Agency shall determine the substantial responsiveness of each bid to the bidding documents. For purposes of these Clauses, a substantially responsive bid is one, which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the bidding documents without material deviations. Deviations from, or objections or reservations to critical provisions, such as those concerning Applicable Law, Drugs Act, Taxes & Duties shall be deemed to be a material deviation for technical proposals. The Procuring Agency’s determination of a bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence.
v. If a bid is not substantially responsive, it shall be rejected by the Procuring Agency and may not subsequently be made responsive by the bidder by correction of the nonconformity.
Preliminary Examination. 1The Procuring entity will examine the tenders to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the tenders are generally in order.
Preliminary Examination. 12.2.1 The Company will examine the Bids for any computational errors, for sureties furnished by Bidder, for authentication of documents submitted and completeness of the Bids.
12.2.2 Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis:
(a) If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail and the total price will be corrected & will be binding to the Bidders.
(b) If there is a discrepancy between the Total Bid Amount and the sum of total prices, the sum of total prices shall prevail and the Total Bid Amount will be corrected & will be binding to the Bidders.
Preliminary Examination. 19.1 Prior to the detailed evaluation, the Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Bid to the Invitation to Bid (ITB). A substantially responsive Bid is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the ITB without material deviations.
19.2 The Purchaser will examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order.
Preliminary Examination. 19.1 The Purchaser will examine the Quotations to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the quotations are generally in order.
19.2 Arithmetical errors, if any be rectified.
19.3 The Purchaser may waive any minor informality or non-conformity or irregularity in Quotation which does not constitute a material deviation, provided such a waiver does not prejudice or affect the relative ranking of any Bidder.
19.4 Prior to the detailed evaluation, the Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each quotation to the bidding documents. For the purpose of these Clauses, a substantially responsive quotation is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the Bidding Documents without material deviations. Deviations or reservations to critical provisions such as those concerning Performance Security, Warranty, Payment Terms and Delivery will be deemed to be a material deviation.
Preliminary Examination. 20.1 Prior to the detailed evaluation, UNDP will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Bid to the Invitation to Bid (ITB). A substantially responsive Bid is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the ITB without material deviations.
20.2 UNDP will examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order.
20.3 Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis: If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected. If the Bidder does not accept the correction of errors, its Bid will be rejected. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures the amount in words will prevail.
20.4 A Bid determined as not substantially responsive will be rejected by UNDP and may not subsequently be made responsive by the Bidder by correction of the non‐conformity.
Preliminary Examination. It is also true, for example, of supplementary and special proceedings such as rule 40—Commitment to Another District, Removal; rule 41—Search and Seizure; and rule 46—Release from Custody. Other of these rules, where applicable, also apply to proceedings before United States magistrates. See Rules of Procedure for the Trial of Minor Offenses Before United States Mag- istrates, rule 1—Scope: These rules govern the procedure and practice for the trial of minor offenses (including xxxxx offenses) before United States magistrates under Title 18, U.S.C. § 3401, and for appeals in such cases to judges of the district courts. To the extent that pretrial and trial procedure and practice are not specifically covered by these rules, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure apply as to minor offenses other than xxxxx offenses. All other pro- ceedings in criminal matters, other than xxxxx offenses, before United States magistrates are governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. State and local judicial officers are governed by these rules, but only when the rule specifically so provides. This is the case of rule 3—The Complaint; rule 4—Ar- rest Warrant or Summons Upon Complaint; and rule 5— Initial Appearance Before the Magistrate. These rules confer authority upon the ‘‘magistrate,’’ a term which is defined in new rule 54 as follows: ‘‘Magistrate’’ includes a United States magistrate as defined in 28 U.S.C. §§ 631–639, a judge of the United States, another judge or judicial officer specifically empowered by statute in force in any territory or pos- session, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Dis- trict of Columbia, to perform a function to which a par- ticular rule relates, and a state or local judicial officer, authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3041 to perform the functions prescribed in rules 3, 4, and 5. Rule 41 provides that a search warrant may be issued xxxx chapters 1 and 54 (2d ed. Cipes 1970, Supp. 1971). NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1982 AMENDMENT The amendment corrects an erroneous cross ref- erence, from Rule 54(c) to Rule 54(a), and replaces the word ‘‘defined’’ with the more appropriate word ‘‘pro- vided.’’ NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1993 AMENDMENT The Rule is amended to conform to the Judicial Im- provements Act of 1990 [P.L. 101–650, Title III, Section 321] which provides that each United States magistrate appointed under section 631 of title 28, United States Code, shall be known as a United States magistrate judge. COMMITTEE ...
Preliminary Examination. 24.1 The Procuring Agency will examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order. 24.2 Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail, and the total price shall be corrected. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, its bid will be rejected, and its bid security may be forfeited. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the amount in words will prevail.
Preliminary Examination. 23.1 Prior to the detailed evaluation, the UNDP will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Bid to the Invitation to Bid (ITB). A substantially responsive Bid is one, which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the ITB without material deviations.
23.2 The UNDP will examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order as specified in Section 2, Bid Data Sheet.
23.3 Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis: If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected. If the Bidder does not accept the correction of errors, its Bid will be rejected. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures the amount in words will prevail.
23.4 A Bid determined as not substantially responsive will be rejected by the UNDP and may not subsequently be made responsive by the Bidder by correction of the non-conformity. UNDP shall use the criteria as detailed in Section 2, Bid Data Sheet to establish responsiveness.
