Preservation Planning Sample Clauses

Preservation Planning sw_licence Contains the licence details. If the licence is selected by the user, the user must provide the url for that licence. sw_version Current version of the software. It is also possible to add metadata about multiple versions of software. sw_platform_type Platforms on which the software or tool operates. sw_organisation The organisation that has created the tool. Figure 3 below show the PrestoKAT user interface. It is possible to add additional metadata tags for a research output. The interface provides suggestions wherever possible using AJAX based drop-downs as the user starts typing the first few characters. Figure 4 below shows the TRL [5] level chooser that has been implemented in PrestoKAT. The idea here is that when a user encounters a new tool (e.g. whilst conducting interviews or browsing through stands at a AV preservation media event or seminar) they can immediately provide an initial estimate of the TRL level based on the data they have gathered during the event. This TRL level may later be adjusted based on the results of the detailed assessment exercise. It also gives users an idea of whether a particular RO is suitable for assessment straight away. We have added a total of 35 research outputs during year 1 into the PrestoKAT database. The tool has undergone rigorous testing internally and our plan is to release the tool publicly in year 2 as a web service.

Preservation Planning. A. The City shall maintain a historic preservation plan that identifies priorities for survey, identification, and research, related to the Local Register of Historic Places (LR) and National Register (NR) nominations for Independence. The historic preservation plan, originally adopted in April 2000, will be updated at least every five years. Review and input by the Independence Heritage Commission as well as the public shall be an integral part of revisions and updates to the preservation plan. B. Within thirty (30) days of adoption by the Independence Heritage Commission of revisions or updates to the historic preservation plan, the City shall provide to the SHPO a printed copy of the preservation plan.

Preservation Planning. In return for the procedural flexibility that this Protocol provides in meeting 36 CFR § 800 responsibilities, the BLM commits to fulfill the responsibilities enumerated in Section 110 of the NHPA. The SD shall develop and implement a Historic Preservation Program (HPP) that (Appendix B) shall be appended as a Supplement to this Protocol using the process specified in Stipulation 16.3. The HPP shall guide the BLM in achieving measurable progress toward compliance with Section 110. The 2007 HPP remains valid until the revised HPP is completed. Development of the new HPP is under way and the BLM commits to producing a final draft to the SHPOs for feedback within 90 days of the execution of this Protocol. The HPP may include, but shall not be limited to: A. Programs of evaluation and National Register nomination; B. Monitoring for historic property condition and ARPA; C. Stabilization and preservation of resources; D. Inventory and documentation of known but unrecorded properties; E. Data synthesis and research targeting topical and geographic priorities to more fully develop proactive landscape scale management of cultural resources consistent with direction in Secretarial Order 3330 and planned for in the DRECP currently under preparation; F. Strategies to improve the quality of existing GIS data and to reduce the backlog of un- synthesized site location and report information; and G. Interpretation and public education involvement in historic preservation through site stewardship programs and other outreach activities.

Preservation Planning