Common use of Procedures for Confirmation Clause in Contracts

Procedures for Confirmation. (i) The University Librarian shall request the Peer Evaluation Committee to initiate proceedings for each eligible professional librarian employee six (6) months prior to the deadlines established according to Articles 11.3(a) and (b). (ii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall request the candidate's immediate supervisor to submit a written evaluation of the candidate's performance to date according to the established criteria together with a recommendation either for confirmation or for continued preliminary appointment or for termination of appointment. (iii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall invite the candidate to present to the committee a written statement of any information which they consider relevant to their candidacy. (iv) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall examine the supervisor's evaluation and recommendation, all previous performance evaluations of the candidate, the candidate's curriculum vitae and statement(s) by the candidate (if any) and shall reach a recommendation. The Peer Evaluation Committee may recommend a confirmed appointment, a continued preliminary appointment or termination of appointment. In the case of a positive recommendation, the committee shall notify the candidate in writing of its decision. If the recommendation is not to grant confirmation, whether it is a decision to allow the appointment to lapse or to extend the preliminary appointment, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall provide a written statement of the reasons on which the decision was based. In the event of a negative recommendation, the candidate shall be interviewed by the committee, if they wish, and shall have the right to choose one colleague to be interviewed by the committee in support of the candidate. In addition, the committee may interview the supervisor(s) if it deems this to be appropriate. (v) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall make a formal statement in writing of its recommendation and the reasons for it to the University Librarian accompanied by all relevant supporting documents. Any disagreement within the committee concerning its recommendation shall also be described in the statement. At the same time a copy of the statement shall be made available to the candidate. (vi) The University Librarian shall communicate their recommendation and that of the committee in writing along with all documentation, to the President at least five

Procedures for Confirmation. (i) The University Librarian shall request the Peer Evaluation Committee to initiate proceedings for each eligible professional librarian employee six (6) months prior to the deadlines established according to Articles 11.3(a) and (b). (ii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall request the candidate's immediate supervisor to submit a written evaluation of the candidate's performance to date according to the established criteria together with a recommendation either for confirmation or for continued preliminary appointment or for termination of appointment. (iii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall invite the candidate to present to the committee a written statement of any information which they consider he/she considers relevant to their his/her candidacy. (iv) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall examine the supervisor's evaluation and recommendation, all previous performance evaluations of the candidate, the candidate's curriculum vitae and statement(s) by the candidate (if any) and shall reach a recommendation. The Peer Evaluation Committee may recommend a confirmed appointment, a continued preliminary appointment or termination of appointment. In the case of a positive recommendation, the committee shall notify the candidate in writing of its decision. If the recommendation is not to grant confirmation, whether it is a decision to allow the appointment to lapse or to extend the preliminary appointment, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall provide a written statement of the reasons on which the decision was based. In the event of a negative recommendation, the candidate shall be interviewed by the committee, if they wishhe/she wishes, and shall have the right to choose one colleague to be interviewed by the committee in support of the candidate. In addition, the committee may interview the supervisor(s) if it deems this to be appropriate. (v) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall make a formal statement in writing of its recommendation and the reasons for it to the University Librarian accompanied by all relevant supporting documents. Any disagreement within the committee concerning its recommendation shall also be described in the statement. At the same time a copy of the statement shall be made available to the candidate. (vi) The University Librarian shall communicate their his/her recommendation and that of the committee in writing along with all documentation, to the President at least fivefive (5) months before the end of the preliminary appointment. The University Librarian shall also communicate his/her recommendation in writing to the candidate by the same date.

Procedures for Confirmation. (i) The University Librarian shall request the Peer Evaluation Committee to initiate proceedings for each eligible professional librarian employee six (6) months prior to the deadlines established according to Articles 11.3(a) and (b). (ii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall request the candidate's immediate supervisor to submit a written evaluation of the candidate's performance to date according to the established criteria together with a recommendation either for confirmation or for continued preliminary appointment or for termination of appointment. (iii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall invite the candidate to present to the committee a written statement of any information which they consider he/she considers relevant to their his/her candidacy. (iv) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall examine the supervisor's evaluation and recommendation, all previous performance evaluations of the candidate, the candidate's curriculum vitae and statement(s) by the candidate (if any) and shall reach a recommendation. The Peer Evaluation Committee may recommend a confirmed appointment, a continued preliminary appointment or termination of appointment. In the case of a positive recommendation, the committee shall notify the candidate in writing of its decision. If the recommendation is not to grant confirmation, whether it is a decision to allow the appointment to lapse or to extend the preliminary appointment, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall provide a written statement of the reasons on which the decision was based. In the event of a negative recommendation, the candidate shall be interviewed by the committee, if they wishhe/she wishes, and shall have the right to choose one colleague to be interviewed by the committee in support of the candidate. In addition, the committee may interview the supervisor(s) if it deems this to be appropriate. (v) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall make a formal statement in writing of its recommendation and the reasons for it to the University Librarian accompanied by all relevant supporting documents. Any disagreement within the committee concerning its recommendation shall also be described in the statement. At the same time a copy of the statement shall be made available to the candidate. (vi) The University Librarian shall communicate their his/her recommendation and that of the committee in writing along with all documentation, to the President at least fivefive (5) months before the end of the preliminary appointment. The University Librarian shall also communicate his/her recommendation in writing to the candidate by the same date. (vii) The President shall inform the candidate in writing of the decision at least four (4) months before the last day of the preliminary appointment.

Procedures for Confirmation. (i) The University Librarian shall request the Peer Evaluation Committee to initiate proceedings for each eligible professional librarian employee six (6) months prior to the deadlines established according to Articles 11.3(a) and (b). (ii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall request the candidate's immediate supervisor to submit a written evaluation of the candidate's performance to date according to the established criteria together with a recommendation either for confirmation or for continued preliminary appointment or for termination of appointment. (iii) . The Peer Evaluation Committee shall invite the candidate to present to the committee a written statement of any information which they consider considers relevant to their candidacy. (iv) . The Peer Evaluation Committee shall examine the supervisor's evaluation and recommendation, all previous performance evaluations of the candidate, the candidate's curriculum vitae and statement(s) by the candidate (if any) and shall reach a recommendation. The Peer Evaluation Committee may recommend a confirmed appointment, a continued preliminary appointment or termination of appointment. In the case of a positive recommendation, the committee shall notify the candidate in writing of its decision. If the recommendation is not to grant confirmation, whether it is a decision to allow the appointment to lapse or to extend the preliminary appointment, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall provide a written statement of the reasons on which the decision was based. In the event of a negative recommendation, the candidate shall be interviewed by the committee, if they wishwishes, and shall have the right to choose one colleague to be interviewed by the committee in support of the candidate. In addition, the committee may interview the supervisor(s) if it deems this to be appropriate. (v) . The Peer Evaluation Committee shall make a formal statement in writing of its recommendation and the reasons for it to the University Librarian accompanied by all relevant supporting documents. Any disagreement within the committee concerning its recommendation shall also be described in the statement. At the same time a copy of the statement shall be made available to the candidate. (vi) . The University Librarian shall communicate their recommendation and that of the committee in writing along with all documentation, to the President at least fivefive (5) months before the end of the preliminary appointment. The University Librarian shall also communicate recommendation in writing to the candidate by the same date. The President shall inform the candidate in writing of the decision at least four (4)months before the last day of the preliminary appointment.

Procedures for Confirmation. (i) The University Librarian shall request the Peer Evaluation Committee to initiate proceedings for each eligible professional librarian employee six (6) months prior to the deadlines established according to Articles 11.3(a) and (b). (ii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall request the candidate's immediate supervisor to submit a written evaluation of the candidate's performance to date according to the established criteria together with a recommendation either for confirmation or for continued preliminary appointment or for termination of appointment. (iii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall invite the candidate to present to the committee a written statement of any information which they consider he/she considers relevant to their his/her candidacy. (iv) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall examine the supervisor's evaluation and recommendation, all previous performance evaluations of the candidate, the candidate's curriculum vitae and statement(s) by the candidate (if any) and shall reach a recommendation. The Peer Evaluation Committee may recommend a confirmed appointment, a continued preliminary appointment or termination of appointment. In the case of a positive recommendation, the committee shall notify the candidate in writing of its decision. If the recommendation is not to grant confirmation, whether it is a decision to allow the appointment to lapse or to extend the preliminary appointment, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall provide a written statement of the reasons on which the decision was based. In the event of a negative recommendation, the candidate shall be interviewed by the committee, if they wishhe/she wishes, and shall have the right to choose one colleague to be interviewed by the committee in support of the candidate. In addition, the committee may interview the supervisor(s) if it deems this to be appropriate. (v) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall make a formal statement in writing of its recommendation and the reasons for it to the University Librarian accompanied by all relevant supporting documents. Any disagreement within the committee concerning its recommendation shall also be described in the statement. At the same time a copy of the statement shall be made available to the candidate. (vi) The University Librarian shall communicate their his/her recommendation and that of the committee in writing along with all documentation, to the President at least five

Procedures for Confirmation. (i) The University Librarian shall request the Peer Evaluation Committee to initiate proceedings for each eligible professional librarian employee six (6) months prior to the deadlines established according to Articles 11.3(a) and (b). (ii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall request the candidate's immediate supervisor to submit a written evaluation of the candidate's performance to date according to the established criteria together with a recommendation either for confirmation or for continued preliminary appointment or for termination of appointment. (iii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall invite the candidate to present to the committee a written statement of any information which they consider he/she considers relevant to their his/her candidacy. (iv) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall examine the supervisor's evaluation and recommendation, all previous performance evaluations of the candidate, the candidate's curriculum vitae and statement(s) by the candidate (if any) and shall reach a recommendation. The Peer Evaluation Committee may recommend a confirmed appointment, a continued preliminary appointment or termination of appointment. In the case of a positive recommendation, the committee shall notify the candidate in writing of its decision. If the recommendation is not to grant confirmation, whether it is a decision to allow the appointment to lapse or to extend the preliminary appointment, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall provide a written statement of the reasons on which onwhich the decision was based. In the event of a negative recommendation, the candidate shall be interviewed by the committee, if they wishhe/she wishes, and shall have the right to choose one colleague to be interviewed by the committee in support of the candidate. In addition, the committee may interview the supervisor(s) if it deems this to be appropriate. (v) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall make a formal statement in writing of its recommendation and the reasons for it to the University Librarian accompanied by all relevant supporting documents. Any disagreement within the committee concerning its recommendation shall also be described in the statement. At the same time a copy of the statement shall be made available to the candidate. (vi) The University Librarian shall communicate their recommendation and that of the committee in writing along with all documentation, to the President at least five