Common use of Procedures for Librarian Promotions Clause in Contracts

Procedures for Librarian Promotions. (i) By October 1 of each year, the Office of the University Librarian shall prepare for the chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a list of professional librarian employees who should be automatically considered for promotion and shall send to each eligible employee a letter indicating that his/her name has been forwarded to the Peer Evaluation Committee for consideration for promotion. (ii) By October 1st of each year, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall email to members and publicly post the timetable for promotion proceedings. (iii) Unless the professional librarian employee requests in a letter to the chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee that s/he not be considered for promotion, each employee shall automatically be considered for promotion in the years specified as normally appropriate in Article 10.7(a). In the case of promotion to Librarian IV, a professional librarian employee shall be automatically considered when first eligible; thereafter, promotion proceedings are always initiated by the individual employee. (iv) Unless a candidate who is not recommended by the Peer Evaluation Committee indicates in writing to the chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a desire not to be considered further, s/he shall be reconsidered automatically by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (v) For each candidate, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall assemble a file containing the following documentation: (1) a current c.v. supplied by the candidate; (2) a letter of reference supplied by the candidate's department head(s) or equivalent; (3) copies of the candidate's annual performance appraisals for the period since the last promotion or since appointment as appropriate; (4) a current job description for the position held and, if applicable, for previous positions held in the period under review; and, (5) except in the case of promotion to Librarian II, a list of three (3) or more names supplied by the candidate to be used as referees. For promotion to Librarian IV, normally at least one (1) of the names shall be that of an individual external to the library. (vi) The University Librarian shall solicit letters from two (2) referees chosen from the candidate's list. If the University Librarian desires to solicit additional references or assessments he/she shall so inform the candidate and submit the names of the proposed referees to the candidate who shall have the right to comment in writing on the names suggested and to have such comments included in his/her official dossier as stated in Article 16.8(a) and (b). (vii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall consider all documentation and may interview the immediate supervisor to obtain clarification on any point. If the Committee or the University Librarian desires to solicit additional written references to support the application, they shall act in accordance with Article

Procedures for Librarian Promotions. (i) By October 1 of each year, the Office of the University Librarian shall prepare for the chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a list of professional librarian employees who should be automatically considered for promotion and shall send to each eligible employee a letter indicating that his/her their name has been forwarded to the Peer Evaluation Committee for consideration for promotion. (ii) By October 1st of each year, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall email to members and publicly post the timetable for promotion proceedings. (iii) Unless the professional librarian employee requests in a letter to the chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee that s/he they not be considered for promotion, each employee shall automatically be considered for promotion in the years specified as normally appropriate in Article 10.7(a). 10.12 (a) In the case of promotion to Librarian IV, a professional librarian employee shall be automatically considered when first eligible; thereafter, promotion proceedings are always initiated by the individual employee. (iv) Unless a candidate who is not recommended by the Peer Evaluation Committee indicates in writing to the chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a desire not to be considered further, s/he they shall be reconsidered automatically by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (v) For each candidate, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall assemble a file containing the following documentation: (1) a current c.v. CV supplied by the candidate; (2) a letter of reference supplied by the candidate's department head(s) or equivalent; (3) copies of the candidate's annual performance appraisals for the period since the last promotion or since appointment as appropriate; (4) a current job description for the position held and, if applicable, for previous positions held in the period under review; and, (5) except in the case of promotion to Librarian II, a list of three (3) or more names supplied by the candidate to be used as referees. For promotion to Librarian IV, normally at least one (1) of the names shall be that of an individual external to the library. (vi) The University Librarian shall solicit letters from two (2) referees chosen from the candidate's list. If the University Librarian desires to solicit additional references or assessments he/she they shall so inform the candidate and submit the names of the proposed referees to the candidate who shall have the right to comment in writing on the names suggested and to have such comments included in his/her their official dossier as stated in Article 16.8(a) and (b). (vii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall consider all documentation and may interview the immediate supervisor to obtain clarification on any point. If the Committee or the University Librarian desires to solicit additional written references to support the application, they shall act in accordance with Article

Procedures for Librarian Promotions. (i) By October 1 of each year, the Office of the University Librarian shall prepare for the chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a list of professional librarian employees who should be automatically considered for promotion and shall send to each eligible employee a letter indicating that his/her their name has been forwarded to the Peer Evaluation Committee for consideration for promotion. (ii) By October 1st of each year, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall email to members and publicly post the timetable for promotion proceedings. (iii) Unless the professional librarian employee requests in a letter to the chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee that s/he they not be considered for promotion, each employee shall automatically be considered for promotion in the years specified as normally appropriate in Article 10.7(a). In the case of promotion to Librarian IV, a professional librarian employee shall be automatically considered when first eligible; thereafter, promotion proceedings are always initiated by the individual employee. (iv) Unless a candidate who is not recommended by the Peer Evaluation Committee indicates in writing to the chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a desire not to be considered further, s/he they shall be reconsidered automatically by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (v) For each candidate, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall assemble a file containing the following documentation: (1) a current c.v. CV supplied by the candidate; (2) a letter of reference supplied by the candidate's department head(s) or equivalent; (3) copies of the candidate's annual performance appraisals for the period since the last promotion or since appointment as appropriate; (4) a current job description for the position held and, if applicable, for previous positions held in the period under review; and, (5) except in the case of promotion to Librarian II, a list of three (3) or more names supplied by the candidate to be used as referees. For promotion to Librarian IV, normally at least one (1) of the names shall be that of an individual external to the library. (vi) The University Librarian shall solicit letters from two (2) referees chosen from the candidate's list. If the University Librarian desires to solicit additional references or assessments he/she they shall so inform the candidate and submit the names of the proposed referees to the candidate who shall have the right to comment in writing on the names suggested and to have such comments included in his/her their official dossier as stated in Article 16.8(a) and (b). (vii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall consider all documentation and may interview the immediate supervisor to obtain clarification on any point. If the Committee or the University Librarian desires to solicit additional written references to support the application, they shall act in accordance with Article

Procedures for Librarian Promotions. (i) By October 1 of each year, the Office of the University Librarian shall prepare for the chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a list of professional librarian employees who should be automatically considered for promotion and shall send to each eligible employee a letter indicating that his/her name has been forwarded to the Peer Evaluation Committee for consideration for promotion. (ii) By October 1st of each year, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall email to members and publicly post notices on the CUASA bulletin boards giving the timetable for promotion proceedings. (iii) Unless the professional librarian employee requests in a letter to the chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee that s/he not be considered for promotion, each employee shall automatically be considered for promotion in the years specified as normally appropriate in Article 10.7(a). In the case of promotion to Librarian IV, a professional librarian employee shall be automatically considered when first eligible; thereafter, promotion proceedings are always initiated by the individual employee. (iv) Unless a candidate who is not recommended by the Peer Evaluation Committee indicates in writing to the chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee a desire not to be considered further, s/he shall be reconsidered automatically by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (v) For each candidate, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall assemble a file containing the following documentation: (1) a current c.v. supplied by the candidate; (2) a letter of reference supplied by the candidate's department head(s) or equivalent; (3) copies of the candidate's annual performance appraisals for the period since the last promotion or since appointment as appropriate; (4) a current job description for the position held and, if applicable, for previous positions held in the period under review; and, (5) except in the case of promotion to Librarian II, a list of three (3) or more names supplied by the candidate to be used as referees. For promotion to Librarian IV, normally at least one (1) of the names shall be that of an individual external to the library. (vi) The University Librarian shall solicit letters from two (2) referees chosen from the candidate's list. If the University Librarian desires to solicit additional references or assessments he/she shall so inform the candidate and submit the names of the proposed referees to the candidate who shall have the right to comment in writing on the names suggested and to have such comments included in his/her official dossier as stated in Article 16.8(a) and (b). (vii) The Peer Evaluation Committee shall consider all documentation and may interview the immediate supervisor to obtain clarification on any point. If the Committee or the University Librarian desires to solicit additional written references to support the application, they shall act in accordance with Article