Common use of Procedures - Process Clause in Contracts

Procedures - Process. Each faculty body (including the UAB) and administrator shall forward copies of their/his/her recommendation or decision to every other faculty body or administrator who has considered or shall consider the case. Such copies shall be forwarded within five (5) days after the recommendation or decision is issued. The affected faculty member shall be entitled to submit written comments regarding any recommendation or decision to the next step in the process; such comments shall be submitted within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the recommendation and need not be submitted to the faculty committees or administrators who have previously reviewed the case. A committee or administrator asking for additional information about issues raised in a candidate’s response to a previous recommendation may share a copy of the candidate’s response with the individual or committee writing the recommendation to which the candidate is responding. The deliberations of each faculty committee are to be held in strict confidence. Individual members of faculty committees reviewing a case shall not meet individually to discuss that case with administrators or other faculty committees reviewing the case except when the faculty member is designated to do so by the committee. If an administrator or faculty committee feels that they need additional information about a recommendation from a faculty committee that has previously considered a case, the administrator or faculty committee may request written clarification or elaboration of the recommendation. Such clarification or elaboration is to be approved by the committee as a whole prior to submission. A candidate shall be given copies of any material added to the file by an administrator or members of a review committee (except for confidential letters received by the committee) and shall be given the opportunity to include a response to that material before the committee or administrator makes its recommendation. Responses to a candidate’s response shall be in writing, with copies to the candidate, previous administrators and committees reviewing the case and the President of the AAUP. Faculty committees or administrators who have previously considered the case may comment on the recommendations they receive per this Article to the next step in the process if they desire or if requested by the faculty committee or administrator considering the case. New information received at subsequent steps in the process need not be sent for comment by faculty committees or administrators who have previously reviewed the case. Except for written statements generated by members of the committee for their internal deliberations (as per Article 5.7), that shall not be forwarded to anyone other than the members of the committee, the faculty member under review shall receive copies of all written correspondence regarding the case exchanged between individual faculty members, faculty committees and/or administrators reviewing the case. The faculty member may respond to the next step in the process within twenty one (21) days of receipt of the statement.

Procedures - Process. Each faculty body (including the UAB) and administrator shall forward copies of their/his/her recommendation or decision to every other faculty body or administrator who has considered or shall consider the case. case.‌ Such copies shall be forwarded within five (5) days after the recommendation or decision is issued. The affected faculty member shall be entitled to submit written comments regarding any recommendation or decision to the next step in the process; such comments shall be submitted within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the recommendation and need not be submitted to the faculty committees or administrators who have previously reviewed the case. A committee or administrator asking for additional information about issues raised in a candidate’s response to a previous recommendation may share a copy of the candidate’s response with the individual or committee writing the recommendation to which the candidate is responding. The deliberations of each faculty committee are to be held in strict confidence. Individual members of faculty committees reviewing a case shall not meet individually to discuss that case with administrators or other faculty committees reviewing the case except when the faculty member is designated to do so by the committee. If an administrator or faculty committee feels that they need additional information about a recommendation from a faculty committee that has previously considered a case, the administrator or faculty committee may request written clarification or elaboration of the recommendation. Such clarification or elaboration is to be approved by the committee as a whole prior to submission. submission.‌ A candidate shall be given copies of any material added to the file by an administrator or members of a review committee (except for confidential letters received by the committee) and shall be given the opportunity to include a response to that material before the committee or administrator makes its recommendation. Responses to a candidate’s response shall be in writing, with copies to the candidate, previous administrators and committees reviewing the case and the President of the AAUP. Faculty committees or administrators who have previously considered the case may comment on the recommendations they receive per this Article to the next step in the process if they desire or if requested by the faculty committee or administrator considering the case. New information received at subsequent steps in the process need not be sent for comment by faculty committees or administrators who have previously reviewed the case. Except for written statements generated by members of the committee for their internal deliberations (as per Article 5.7), that shall not be forwarded to anyone other than the members of the committee, the faculty member under review shall receive copies of all written correspondence regarding the case exchanged between individual faculty members, faculty committees and/or administrators reviewing the case. The faculty member may respond to the next step in the process within twenty one (21) days of receipt of the statement.

Procedures - Process. Each faculty body (including the UAB) and administrator shall forward copies of their/his/her their recommendation or decision to every other faculty body or administrator who has considered or shall consider the case. Such copies shall be forwarded within five (5) days after the recommendation or decision is issued. The affected faculty member shall be entitled to submit written comments regarding any recommendation or decision to the next step in the process; such comments shall be submitted within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the recommendation and need not be submitted to the faculty committees or administrators who have previously reviewed the case. A committee or administrator asking for additional information about issues raised in a candidate’s response to a previous recommendation may share a copy of the candidate’s response with the individual or committee writing the recommendation to which the candidate is responding. The deliberations of each faculty committee are to be held in strict confidence. Individual members of faculty committees reviewing a case shall not meet individually to discuss that case with administrators or other faculty committees reviewing the case except when the faculty member is designated to do so by the committee. If an administrator or faculty committee feels that they need additional information about a recommendation from a faculty committee that has previously considered a case, the administrator or faculty committee may request written clarification or elaboration of the recommendation. Such clarification or elaboration is to be approved by the committee as a whole prior to submission. A candidate shall be given copies of any material added to the file by an administrator or members of a review committee (except for confidential letters received by the committee) and shall be given the opportunity to include a response to that material before the committee or administrator makes its recommendation. Responses to a candidate’s response shall be in writing, with copies to the candidate, previous administrators and committees reviewing the case and the President of the AAUP. Faculty committees or administrators who have previously considered the case may comment on the recommendations they receive per this Article to the next step in the process if they desire or if requested by the faculty committee or administrator considering the case. New information received at subsequent steps in the process need not be sent for comment by faculty committees or administrators who have previously reviewed the case. Except for written statements generated by members of the committee for their internal deliberations (as per Article 5.7), that shall not be forwarded to anyone other than the members of the committee, the faculty member under review shall receive copies of all written correspondence regarding the case exchanged between individual faculty members, faculty committees and/or administrators reviewing the case. The faculty member may respond to the next step in the process within twenty one (21) days of receipt of the statement.