Common use of Professional Contribution and Standing Clause in Contracts

Professional Contribution and Standing. In most cases distinction within a profession arises from the communication of knowledge or skills through public service and community engagement, scholarly publica- tion, or the production of works of art. Although publica- tion and performance are not in themselves a guarantee of excellence, one recognises that these kinds of professional activity are addressed to communities larger than York University and that, therefore, they must be judged in this larger professional context. In certain cases a distin- guished public expression constitutes prima facie evidence that the quality of the work has been assessed and found to be of a high standard; in other cases it may be necessary to solicit assessments from specialists in the same field. When the candidate has written or produced a work as part of a team or group in a research project, including in the context of community-engaged scholarship, the nature of their contribution must be assessed. Intellectual achievement may also be manifested by stud- ies or activities that have been commissioned by govern- ments or by private institutions. Contributions of this kind are significant, but they can be uneven and should always be evaluated by a recognised authority in the same field. Generally, the quality of a candidate’s scholarship will be evaluated in the light of judgements by reputable scholars, augmented where relevant by the judgement of commun- ity experts; in cases where there may be division within a discipline, the File Preparation Committee should de- scribe the nature of the conflict among schools of thought and present the Adjudicating Committee with a wider range of professional opinion. Where the candidate is rela- xxxxxx xxxxxx, judgement should point not only to immedi- ate achievement, but to the promise or lack of promise for further development. The work performed by members of faculty for public and private institutions and for community constituencies or organizations is indeed an integral part of the relation- ship between the University and the community. Com- munication with the general public in a variety of forms and media will be a continuing necessity for the modern university, and outstanding contributions of faculty in this area must be recognised. Service in the context of com- munity-engaged scholarship to various public agencies or organizations, presentation of lectures and talks to other than professional audiences, performances with radio and television networks — all such activity should be docu- mented as evidence of any special capacity to enhance the intellectual relationship between the University and the community. These activities must not be separated from the other criteria; they will be weighed in relation to the central core of responsibility which belongs to every member of faculty not only to transmit but to extend the boundaries of per- ception, understanding and knowledge.

Professional Contribution and Standing. In most cases distinction within a profession arises from the communication of knowledge or skills through public service and community engagementservice, scholarly publica- tionpublication, or the production of works of art. Although publica- tion publication and performance are not in themselves a guarantee of excellence, one recognises that these kinds of professional activity are addressed to communities com- munities larger than York University and that, therefore, they must be judged in this larger professional context. In certain cases a distin- guished distinguished public expression constitutes prima facie evidence that the quality of the work has been assessed and found to be of a high standard; in other cases it may be necessary to solicit assessments from specialists spe- cialists in the same field. When the candidate has written or produced a work as part of a team or group in a research project, including in the context of community-engaged scholarship, the nature of their his or her contribution must be assessed. Intellectual achievement may also be manifested by stud- ies or activities that have been commissioned by govern- ments or by private institutions. Contributions of this kind are significant, but they can be uneven and should always be evaluated by a recognised authority in the same field. Generally, the quality of a candidate’s scholarship will be evaluated in the light of judgements by reputable scholars, augmented where relevant by the judgement of commun- ity expertsschol- ars; in cases where there may be division within a disciplinedisci- xxxxx, the File Preparation Committee should de- scribe describe the nature of the conflict among schools of thought and present pres- ent the Adjudicating Committee with a wider range of professional opinion. Where the candidate is rela- xxxxxx xxxxxxrelatively junior, judgement should point not only to immedi- ate immediate achievement, but to the promise or lack of promise for further development. The work performed by members of faculty for public and private institutions and for community constituencies or organizations is indeed an integral part of the relation- ship rela- tionship between the University and the community. Com- munication Communication with the general public in a variety of forms and media will be a continuing necessity for the modern university, and outstanding contributions of faculty fac- ulty in this area must be recognised. Service in the context of com- munity-engaged scholarship an adviso- ry capacity to various public agencies or organizationsagencies, presentation of lectures lec- tures and talks to other than professional audiences, performances per- formances with radio and television networks — all such activity should be docu- mented documented as evidence of any special capacity to enhance the intellectual relationship between the University and the community. These activities must not be separated from the other criteriacri- teria; they will be weighed in relation to the central core of responsibility which belongs to every member of faculty not only to transmit but to extend the boundaries of per- ception, understanding and knowledge.

Professional Contribution and Standing. In most cases distinction within a profession arises from the communication of knowledge or skills through public service and community engagement, scholarly publica- tion, or the production of works of art. Although publica- tion and performance are not in themselves a guarantee of excellenceofexcellence, one recognises that these kinds of professional activity professionalactivity are addressed to communities larger than York University and that, therefore, they must be judged in this larger professional context. In certain cases a distin- guished public expression constitutes prima facie evidence that the quality of the work has been assessed and found to be of a high standard; in other cases it may be necessary to necessaryto solicit assessments from specialists in the same field. When the candidate has written or produced a work as part of a team or group in a research project, including in the context of community-engaged scholarship, the nature of natureof their contribution must be assessed. Intellectual achievement may also be manifested by stud- ies or activities that have been commissioned by govern- ments or by private institutions. Contributions of this kind are kindare significant, but they can be uneven and should always be evaluated by a recognised authority in the same field. Generally, the quality of a candidate’s scholarship will be evaluated in the light of judgements by reputable scholars, augmented where relevant by the judgement of commun- ity experts; in cases where there may be division within a discipline, the File Preparation Committee should de- scribe the nature of the conflict among schools of thought and present the Adjudicating Committee with a wider range of professional opinion. Where the candidate is rela- xxxxxx xxxxxxrela-tively junior, judgement should point not only to immedi- ate achievement, but to the promise or lack of promise for further forfurther development. The work performed by members of faculty for public and private institutions and for community constituencies or organizations is indeed an integral part of the relation- ship between the University and the community. Com- munication with the general public in a variety of forms and media will be a continuing necessity for the modern university, and outstanding contributions of faculty in this area must be recognised. Service in the context of com- munity-engaged scholarship to various public agencies or organizations, presentation of lectures and talks to other than professional audiences, performances with radio and television networks — all such activity should be docu- mented as evidence of any special capacity to enhance the intellectual relationship between the University and the community. These activities must not be separated from the other criteria; they will be weighed in relation to the central core of coreof responsibility which belongs to every member of faculty not facultynot only to transmit but to extend the boundaries of per- ception, understanding and knowledge.

Professional Contribution and Standing. In most cases distinction within a profession arises from the communication of knowledge or skills through public service and community engagement, scholarly publica- tion, or the production of works of art. Although publica- tion and performance are not in themselves a guarantee of excellence, one recognises that these kinds of professional activity are addressed to communities larger than York University and that, therefore, they must be judged in this larger professional context. In certain cases a distin- guished public expression constitutes prima facie evidence that the quality of the work has been assessed and found to be of a high standard; in other cases it may be necessary to solicit assessments from specialists in the same field. When the candidate has written or produced a work as part of a team or group in a research project, including in the context of community-engaged scholarship, the nature of their his or her contribution must be assessed. Intellectual achievement may also be manifested by stud- ies or activities that have been commissioned by govern- ments or by private institutions. Contributions of this kind are significant, but they can be uneven and should always be evaluated by a recognised authority in the same field. Generally, the quality of a candidate’s scholarship will be evaluated in the light of judgements by reputable scholars, augmented where relevant by the judgement of commun- ity experts; in cases where there may be division within a discipline, the File Preparation Committee should de- scribe the nature of the conflict among schools of thought and present the Adjudicating Committee with a wider range of professional opinion. Where the candidate is rela- xxxxxx xxxxxx, judgement should point not only to immedi- ate achievement, but to the promise or lack of promise for further development. The work performed by members of faculty for public and private institutions and for community constituencies or organizations is indeed an integral part of the relation- ship between the University and the community. Com- munication with the general public in a variety of forms and media will be a continuing necessity for the modern university, and outstanding contributions of faculty in this area must be recognised. Service in the context of com- munity-engaged scholarship to various public agencies or organizations, presentation of lectures and talks to other than professional audiences, performances with radio and television networks — all such activity should be docu- mented as evidence of any special capacity to enhance the intellectual relationship between the University and the community. These activities must not be separated from the other criteria; they will be weighed in relation to the central core of responsibility which belongs to every member of faculty not only to transmit but to extend the boundaries of per- ception, understanding and knowledge.

Professional Contribution and Standing. In most cases distinction within a profession arises from the communication of knowledge or skills through public service and community engagement, scholarly publica- tionpublication, or the production of works of art. Although publica- tion publication and performance per- formance are not in themselves a guarantee of excellence, one recognises that these kinds of professional activity are addressed to communities larger than York University and that, therefore, they must be judged in this larger professional profes- sional context. In certain cases a distin- guished distinguished public expression ex- pression constitutes prima facie evidence that the quality of the work has been assessed and found to be of a high standardstand- ard; in other cases it may be necessary to solicit assessments from specialists in the same field. When the candidate has written or produced a work as part of a team or group in a research project, including in the context of community-engaged scholarship, the nature of their his or her contribution must be assessed. Intellectual achievement may also be manifested by stud- ies studies or activities that have been commissioned by govern- ments governments or by private institutions. Contributions of this kind are significantsig- nificant, but they can be uneven and should always be evaluated evalu- ated by a recognised authority in the same field. Generally, the quality of a candidate’s scholarship will be evaluated in the light of judgements by reputable scholars, augmented where relevant by the judgement of commun- ity community experts; in cases where there may be division within a disciplinedisci- xxxxx, the File Preparation Committee should de- scribe describe the nature of the conflict among schools of thought and present the Adjudicating Committee with a wider range of professional profes- sional opinion. Where the candidate is rela- xxxxxx xxxxxxrelatively junior, judgement should point not only to immedi- ate immediate achievement, but to the promise or lack of promise for further developmentdevelop- ment. The work performed by members of faculty for public and private institutions and for community constituencies or organizations is indeed an integral part of the relation- ship relationship between the University and the community. Com- munication Communication with the general public in a variety of forms and media will be a continuing necessity for the modern university, and outstanding contributions of faculty in this area must be recognised. Service in the context of com- munitycommunity-engaged scholarship to various public agencies or organizations, presentation of lectures and talks to other than professional audiences, performances with radio and television networks — all such activity should be docu- mented documented as evidence of any special capacity to enhance the intellectual relationship between be- tween the University and the community. These activities must not be separated from the other criteriaxxxxx- ria; they will be weighed in relation to the central core of responsibility which belongs to every member of faculty not only to transmit but to extend the boundaries of per- ceptionperception, understanding and knowledge.

Professional Contribution and Standing. In most cases distinction within a profession arises from the communication of knowledge or skills through public service and community engagement, scholarly publica- tionpublication, or the production of works of art. Although publica- tion publication and performance are not in themselves a guarantee of excellence, one recognises that these kinds of professional activity are addressed to communities larger lar- ger than York University and that, therefore, they must be judged in this larger professional context. In certain cases a distin- guished distinguished public expression constitutes prima facie evidence that the quality of the work has been assessed as- sessed and found to be of a high standard; in other cases it may be necessary to solicit assessments from specialists special- ists in the same field. When the candidate has written or produced a work as part of a team or group in a research project, including in the context of community-engaged scholarship, the nature of their contribution must be assessed. Intellectual achievement may also be manifested by stud- ies studies or activities that have been commissioned by govern- ments governments or by private institutions. Contributions of this kind are significant, but they can be uneven and should always be evaluated by a recognised authority in the same field. Generally, the quality of a candidate’s scholarship will be evaluated in the light of judgements by reputable scholars, augmented where relevant by the judgement of commun- ity community experts; in cases where there may be division within a discipline, the File Preparation Committee should de- scribe describe the nature of the conflict among schools of thought and present the Adjudicating Committee with a wider range of professional opinion. Where the candidate xxxxx- date is rela- xxxxxx xxxxxxrelatively junior, judgement should point not only to immedi- ate immediate achievement, but to the promise or lack of promise for further development. The work performed by members of faculty for public and private institutions and for community constituencies constituen- cies or organizations is indeed an integral part of the relation- ship relationship between the University and the community. Com- munication Communication with the general public in a variety of forms and media will be a continuing necessity for the modern university, and outstanding contributions of faculty in this area must be recognised. Service in the context of com- munitycommunity-engaged scholarship to various public agencies or organizations, presentation of lectures and talks to other than professional audiences, performances perform- ances with radio and television networks — all such activity should be docu- mented documented as evidence of any special capacity to enhance the intellectual relationship between the University and the community. These activities must not be separated from the other criteria; they will be weighed in relation to the central core of responsibility which belongs to every member of faculty not only to transmit but to extend the boundaries of per- ceptionperception, understanding and knowledge.