Prohibition on Mid-year Benefit Enhancements Sample Clauses

Prohibition on Mid-year Benefit Enhancements. Requirements under § 1860D-11, to the extent necessary solely to permit Part D sponsors to add Plan Selected Model Drugs at any time during the plan year, consistent with existing Part D formulary requirements.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Prohibition on Mid-year Benefit Enhancements

  • Pension Contributions While on Short Term Disability Contributions for OMERS Plan Members When an employee/plan member is on short-term sick leave and receiving less than 100% of regular salary, the Board will continue to deduct and remit OMERS contributions based on 100% of the employee/plan member’s regular pay.

  • Survivor Benefits 1. A surviving dependent of a retiree who was eligible to receive a Retiree Medical Grant, as stated above in A through C, and who qualifies for a monthly allowance shall be eligible for fifty (50) percent of the Grant authorized for the retiree.

  • Post-Retirement Benefits The present value of the expected cost of post-retirement medical and insurance benefits payable by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries to its employees and former employees, as estimated by the Borrower in accordance with procedures and assumptions deemed reasonable by the Required Lenders is zero.

  • Beneficiary Rollovers from Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans If you are a spouse Beneficiary, nonspouse Beneficiary, or the trustee of an eligible type of trust named as Beneficiary of a deceased employer plan participant, you may directly roll over inherited assets from a qualified retirement plan, 403(a) annuity, 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity, or 457(b) governmental deferred compensation plan to an inherited IRA. The IRA must be maintained as an inherited IRA, subject to the beneficiary distribution requirements.

  • Public Benefit It is Solid & Striped’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Solid & Striped under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Solid & Striped that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Solid & Striped failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DINP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Solid & Striped is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.