Public Benefit. It is One Design’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by One Design under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of One Design that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to One Design failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that One Design is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is XR's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as POP is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Xxx Xxxxxxxxx's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxx Xxxxxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Xxx Xxxxxxxxx that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Xxx Xxxxxxxxx's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Sun Chlorella is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. The Parties acknowledge that their contributions to the Project are meant to accrue to the public benefit.
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by it under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and California Code of Regulations tit. 11,
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxxx’x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Xxxxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Xxxxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Xxxxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ understanding that the commitments agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Consumer Value under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the Parties’ intent that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Consumer Value’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to chromium (VI) prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Consumer Value is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is j/fit’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by j/fit under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of j/fit that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to j/fit failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that j/fit is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxxxxx'x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxxxxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Craighill that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Xxxxxxxxx'x alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Craighill is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
