Public Benefit Sample Clauses
Public Benefit. It is Providers’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Providers under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Providers that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to either Providers’ failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products each has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Providers are in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is XR's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is the understanding of PRINT-RITE ITI and Releasees that the commitments they have agreed to herein, and actions to be taken under this Settlement Agreement, will confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of PRINT-RITE ITI and the Releasees that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to their alleged failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to styrene from use of the Covered Products manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that PRINT-RITE ITI and the Releasees are in compliance with this Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxx Xxxxx'x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxxxxx Xxxxx under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Xxxxxx Xxxxx that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Xxxxxx Xxxxx'x alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Xxxxxx Xxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxxx’x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Xxxxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Xxxxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Xxxxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. The Parties acknowledge that their contributions to the Project are meant to accrue to the public benefit.
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxxxxxx Xxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal.
Public Benefit. It is Soho Home's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Soho Home under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Soho Home that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Soho Home's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Soho Home is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Xxxxxx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by it under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and California Code of Regulations tit. 11,