Common use of Promotion and Tenure File Clause in Contracts

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson Xxxx of the University Library or XxxxAssociate Xxxx of the Library, may have access to the non-non- evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson TSAS Director or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair TSAS Director will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson Associate Xxxx or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson Associate Xxxx or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 13.11.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson TSAS Director or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 13.11.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson Xxxx of the University Library or XxxxAssociate University Librarian, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by a member of the faculty, other than the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 13.11.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson TSAS Director or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by the TSAS Director, the Xxxx or a member of the faculty, other than faculty acceptable to both the Xxxx and the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 13.11.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by the department Chairperson, the Xxxx or a member of the faculty, other than faculty acceptable to both the Xxxx and the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 13.11.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, untrue shall be immediately removed.

Promotion and Tenure File. 13.10.1 13.11.1 Promotion and tenure materials shall be maintained in a secure manner and means of storage an appropriate location determined by the University. Candidates, in the presence of the department Chairperson Associate Xxxx or Xxxx, may have access to the non-evaluative promotion and tenure materials. In order to encourage participation and to assure candor, evaluations related to the promotion and tenure process are considered confidential and are not, therefore, available to the candidate. 13.10.2 13.11.2 With respect to letters of recommendation and other personal evaluations of a candidate, each evaluation must be accompanied by a statement indicating whether an evaluation was invited or not invited, and if invited, what process was used to determine from whom an evaluation was requested, in what manner an evaluation was requested, and other facts pertinent to the invitations. 13.10.3 Once during the promotion and tenure process, 13.11.3 At any step the candidate may request a summary of the confidential materials. The summary materials which will be prepared by the Associate Xxxx, the Xxxx, or a member of the faculty, other than faculty acceptable to both the Xxxx and the candidate, selected by the following procedure. The candidate will propose a list of at least three members of the faculty and the Department Chair will choose one of them. This summary must include the names of individuals whose evaluations are in the file, but they should not connect any particular idea or quote with any particular individual. Candidates (and only candidates) shall be entitled to submit a rebuttal to the summary statement of confidential material. If a rebuttal is submitted, the summary upon which it is based becomes a part of the promotion and tenure file. If the candidate does not submit a rebuttal, the summary does not become a part of the promotion and tenure file. 13.10.4 13.11.4 Any material in the file which the candidate can demonstrate to the University to be inaccurate or untrue, shall be immediately removed.