Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Settling Defendants then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Settling Defendants shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $28,600 for reasonable fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel refused to consider any reimbursement of plaintiff’s fees or costs until all other terms of the settlement were reached. The Parties then reached an accord on the reimbursement due to Davia and compensation of her counsel under general contract principles and consistent with the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. Under these principles, GBG shall reimburse Davia the amount of $25,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating and negotiating a resolution of this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $23,200 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, on behalf of the Settling Sellers Trends shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $25,000 for fees and costs, incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. Davia has confirmed to Berkshire Blanket her willingness to execute a settlement on all terms except for reimbursement of plaintiff’s fees and costs, leaving such issue for formal resolution independent of this Agreement. However, the Parties have reached an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Berkshire Blanket shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $28,900 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties have reached an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Dick’s shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $24,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Vinylux then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and his counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Vinylux shall pay Davia and his counsel, in accordance with the schedule below, the amount of $21,500.00 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Vinylux shall issue a separate check for this payment to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”, which check shall be delivered to the addresses listed in Section 4.4 below.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them and leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of this Agreement had been negotiated. Beauty Sourcing expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beauty Sourcing shall pay Davia’s counsel, no later than May 29, 2020, the amount of $23,500 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. If Payment is not delivered to Davia’s counsel until after May 29, 2020, the amount of Beauty Sourcing’s fee/cost reimbursement payment shall be and is increased to $24,500.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Sunham then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter. Under these legal principles, Sunham shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $31,000.00 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Pacific World expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter. Under these legal principles, Pacific World shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $29,000 for all fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
